What have been the prevailing creationist/intelligent design explanations for the origin and development of organic beings and how have these views been challenged by Darwin’s theory of evolution? Charles Darwin’s publication of the theory of evolution through natural selection is one of the pivotal moments in the history of science…
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Prevailing creationist/intelligent design explanations for the origin and development of organic beings and how have these views"
with a personal 20% discount.
Download file to see previous pages...
Despite this fact the theory has generated a lot of controversy – both among the general public and among intellectuals. Leading the aggression are the religiously orthodox, who see a threat to the tenets of their faith. To overcome their insecurities they adopt one of two approaches. First, they try to reject evolution as valid scientific theory for want of adequate evidence supporting it. When this fails, they co-opt the theory into a religious understanding and project the process of evolution as God’s will in action. Needless to say these defenses are the hubris of the defeated. The rest of this essay will present some prevailing creationist explanations and their successful refutation by Darwin’s theory of evolution. In the article Designer Thinking by Mark S. Blumberg, the author counters a common rhetorical ploy by creationists. Creationists find it easy to invoke God for explaining the complex design and functioning of organs such as the eye. At first it is a seemingly sound argument, for it is difficult to believe that an organ as sophisticated as the eye could have formed through random mutations. But here is a profound misunderstanding of Darwin’s theory. The theory never claimed that organs pop into existence out of nowhere. Rather, when minute random mutations are empowered by the vast expanses of geological time, remarkable transformations occur. The eye, for all its splendor and sophisticated working, began its journey as a group of light-sensitive cells on the skin of a primitive species. As Darwin explained in Origin of Species, “numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case”. (Blumberg) Hence the seemingly robust argument from the ‘intelligent design’ camp is shown to be based upon a miscomprehension of how evolution works. The members of the school board who decide upon curricula might find the ‘intelligent design’ argument intuitive. They may even find it appealing to common sense. But as Darwin himself and his later disciples like Mark Blumberg have shown there is neither the application of intelligence nor any evidence for design in how complex organs come into being. It is equally reassuring to note that despite the complexity and advanced functionality of organs and organisms, they have numerous imperfections as well – the blind spot being the most glaring one. Any divine creator for the eye would not have committed such a fundamental design error. It is these imperfections that decide the debate in favor of evolution. As evolutionary biologist Steven Jay Gould once noted, “Odd arrangements and funny solutions are the proof of evolution – paths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural process, constrained by history, follows perforce.” (Blumberg) Scholar Richard Milner’s article Darwin in Court reminds us, evolution is now being attacked by school authorities and courts alike. Nowhere is this phenomenon is nowhere more blatant than in the United States, where conservative Christians have considerable political sway. Even among the general population a substantial percentage identify themselves as practicing Christians. Within this group there is a contingency that takes the Bible quite literally along with its myths and dogma. In those states where
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Prevailing creationist/intelligent design explanations for the origin Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1487442-prevailing-creationist-intelligent-design
(Prevailing creationist/Intelligent Design Explanations for the Origin Essay)
“Prevailing creationist/Intelligent Design Explanations for the Origin Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1487442-prevailing-creationist-intelligent-design.
The paper provides no plausible reason for teaching ID, other than it supports their beliefs. This does not support teaching children how to define thought and create a belief based upon true understanding. In understanding the difference between philosophy and science, a student can critically frame their beliefs.
Before the theory of evolution had been accepted as a scientific fact, the theory of creationism - the belief that a Supreme Being created the world - served as the explanation of the origin of life. This theory was defeated by the evolutionists largely because it was deemed unscientific and cannot be supported by empirical evidence.
This paper seeks to explore the raging debate on the intelligent design versus the natural selection. With this in mind, the underlying facts behind each of the subjects are going to be analyzed; however, the final goal is to show what is more likely to be true: the natural selection theory or the intelligent design one.
Dembski argues against naturalism and posits that intelligent design is the cure for naturalism. Through the ideas of complex specification and irreducible complexity, Dembski attempts to show the reader how improbably evolution is. He also gives the reader more theological based essays throughout.
Dembski states that it is a mistake to think of eternal objects as somehow patiently waiting in nonbeing until they are brought into being. This determination refers to the eternal object's function as the subjective form of how appropriation takes place.
Those who remain willfully ignorant believe there is a debate to be had regarding the age old question of ‘how we got here.’ They insist the Biblical version and not the scientific theory of evolution holds the true answer. The emotion-charged debate generally centers on which version will be taught in the public schools.
It has extended its hands even up to outer space to explore the outer space details. Large hadrons collider experiment is at present underway to find out the Higgs boson, the last unobserved particle among those
Additionally, it evaluates the views of creationism and its direct relations with Christianity.
Parents must have the right to participate in decision-making as to scientific theories concepts and ideas to be incorporated in school curriculum. For example, such ideas
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Prevailing creationist/intelligent design explanations for the origin and development of organic beings and how have these views for FREE!