Thematic significance of Trauma Flowers of War and Sword of Desperation are preoccupied with psychological transformations in the aftermath of war and feuds, interclass feuds, nationalism and displacement that characterized the Asian histories. The focus has been on using trauma as an attempt to evoke traumatic memories of the past since the phenomenon reveals an abhorrence of the historical events in the Asian history. The experiences of trauma created in Flowers of War and Sword of Desperation adhere to the standard definitions of trauma.
Ordinarily, trauma refers to the response to an overwhelming or unexpected violent and disturbing event that is not fully grasped as it occurs, but subsequently returns to nightmares, emotional tragedies, flashbacks or some other kind of repetitive phenomenon (CSTS 2013). In watching Flowers of War and Sword of Desperation, it is perceivable that although the two films do not inflict physical violence upon the audience, they both tend to present to their viewers images of traumatic tragedies that characterized Asian histories (Bodnar 2001).
For instance, by watching both movies, the mind goes into a mental shock and becomes incapable of interpreting the impressions of the event into logical mental representation (Anon n.d.). In the Flowers of War, the scenes of the massacre evoke these images, while in the Sword of Desperation, the scene of how Kanemi plunges a knife into Lord Ukyo’s concubine, presents these images. Also, both films employ the use of trauma to expose the viewers to the tyrannies and vicious control of the Asian territories in the past.
For instance, the cruel officialdom and the tyrannies of the Tokugama in the 9th century in the Asian territories are showed in Sword of Desperation. In Flowers of War, the massacre by the Japanese in the Chinese territory shows how Japan viciously sought to assume control of the Asian territories in the past (Standish 2000). Trauma is used in both films to express nationalism and resentment, and loyalty and betrayals to the ruling class. With regard to Flowers of War, it is perceivable that even as the movie resonates with traumatic phenomena, its seems to legitimize China’s pursuit of war in East Asia while at the same time denying both Japan and China responsibility for atrocities (McCarthy 2011).
A similar trend is seen in Sword of Desperation although differently. Here, Trauma is used to express loyalty and betrayal to the Tokugawa shogunate. Trauma is used to cause resentment to the Tokugawa rule that gave landowners called daimyo great powers in the 9th century (Webb 2011). Trauma is used in the Sword of Desperation and Flowers of War to show the inherent tragedies that happened in the generations and how it caused havoc to the lives of the people in these generations. In the Sword of Desperation and Flowers of War, trauma helps to show the inherent fears and desperations that people had to live with during the Edo (pre-Tokyo Japan) generation (Foster 2013).
In Flowers of War, fears and desperations that the Chinese had to live with during the Sino-Japanese war are evoked. In both cases, trauma is based on the meaningless and spiteful loss of young lives (teenagers aged 17 and above) as well as in the powerlessness to change history. In both films, the viewer’s trauma is circular since it allows for revisiting both scenes. Both Sword of Desperation and Flowers of War have a unique ability to trace the source of trauma in the same way they exposes the viewers to different traumatic scenes during the time of viewing.
This is a distinct form of ‘vicarious trauma”, which actually uses all aspects of the original traumatic experiences at the start of the movies to the end (Kaplan 2005). An element of such aspects exists in Sword of Desperation, where the vicariousness appears to feature more through flashbacks. This allows viewers to experience trauma in a detached and safe circularity (Foster, S 2013). This is evidenced at the beginning of the film when Kanamo plunges a knife into Lord Ukyo’s concubine.
Read More