Furthermore, its running time means that its audience needs to read so much of the subtitles in English. Imperatively, the western audience may find this too difficult to concentrate on reading, listening, and watching. Another aspect that makes it difficult for these productions is casting. For instance, the role and performance of Christian Bale in film “Flowers of War” has received mixed reactions from film analysts. Most western movies about Asia and Africa have white characters (Ma 2013, p.13). The essence of these characters, according to western film-making tradition, is to provide a way for a foreign subject for the western audience.
These characters are considered to be non-interest parties in such conflicts. Christian Bale stars as a dissolute mortician who must act as a Catholic priest to save hundreds of women and girls from being raped by the attacking troops when the Nanjing massacre occurred. Critics believe that such roles amounts to whitewashing and wonder if the film director, Zhang Yimou, could not get a Chinese priest (Bettinson 2013, p260). Critics have posited that perhaps one of the biggest flops of such a production was the attempt by the director to allow a white person to tell a Chinese story, particularly its political history.
However, a contrary opinion has been that the west must pay attention to, and care about the piece of Chinese history demonstrated through the production. Again, about twenty-seven foreigners (westerners) were in Nanjing at the time of the massacre and many showed their bravery, an attribute that the director sought to make about the whites (Ebert 2012, p1). Additionally, one would argue that casting Bale, one of the A-listers in Hollywood was aimed at asserting that the Chinese film industry aspires to have equal status with its American competitors.
Therefore, the Chinese film, with all its impressive budget, most of it funded by the Communist government, did not succeed at the international level as the western audience did not find it appealing. The film went on to rake in just over $100 million (Bettinson 2013, p261). Violence is used in many films across the world. However, the atrocities depicted in the Chinese production “Flowers of Wars” are at best appalling. One may suggest that such violent scenes exceed the view from a western audience that is accustomed to perhaps too much violence on television and would wish to view less violent films, especially when originating from other cultures and parts of the world (Wright 2013, p2).
Violence in the film revolves around the treatment of the women characters, where the sharp divide between the virginal schoolgirls and the brassy prostitutes is evident (Ebert 2012, p1). Such scenes make it difficult for a western audience to view the film because of violence targeted at a certain gender. So much is the violence that one wonders if there are any political undertones in the movie. For instance, some American film critics have questioned the appalling Chinese atrocities based on their perception of violence.
Again, other scenes like the combat outside the cathedral, where a Chinese folk hero, Major Li, that had single-handedly defied the Japanese are overly riveting and scary. A majority of Asian films have gained success, albeit among western audience, because of the genre that they use, particularly martial arts (Weiss 2016, p433). For instance, Chinese productions have borrowed much of their literary traditions and use stories that focus on martial arts heroes that combine with elements of history, adventure and fantasy.
However, the biggest obstacle to these productions has been the Mandarin-scripted films where the leading cast has sharp conflicting regional accents, a situation that poses a great challenge to interpreters (Weiss 2016, p1). The additional of subtitles based on regional accents of Mandarin has made these films less successful in the Western world. A poor track record of the subtitles for the Chinese film production of “Flowers of War” make it difficult for a Western audience to understand and follow through the production and underlines its dismal performance at a time when many have viewed the Chinese film industry as attractive, burgeoning and focused on reducing the American footprint in the global movie industry (Wright 2013, p2).
Read More