Knowing Deaf People while Signing to Them - Essay Example

The experiences learned while communicating with people whose communication styles differ are diverse. It is after meeting several friends in the Deaf Linx chatroom that I learned of the challenges that might occur while engaging in communication with people. For example, the chatting experience that occurred in the initial stages of the conversation influenced me to understand that my recipients were unable to understand the meanings bound in the many signs I used. The situation influenced the understanding that the signing languages I used could be acceptable to other people with the ability to hear, but could deliver controversial information to deaf recipients (Hauser et al. 488). Further, I learned that this group of people was impulsive to the signs whose underlying meaning seemed abusive or complicated to them despite the use being a normal one.

I was nervous while communicating with the deaf people because I was unable to inform them that I was capable of hearing and speaking contrary to their expectations since the majority of members in the chatroom were deaf. The fact that I was inconsistent in signing to them with the same speed they took to communicate to me spurred anxiety and I could not contemplate the alternative measures to establish in solving the imminent misunderstandings that would emanate from the delays. Despite bearing knowledge of the signs used by the majority population of people in the deaf culture, I was incompetent in elevating the desired skills as there different types of misunderstandings would result from the different perceptions that different chat members bore towards the signings (Davidson 792).

Despite the challenges experienced during the chatroom conversations, the deaf people cooperated and educated me on their experiences while living with the condition as they were growing up. The chatroom experience influenced the understanding that the people were aggressive towards the people who were capable of hearing and speaking holding the belief that such people were ignorant of their inability to hear; hence, the use of verbal communication was deliberate and abusive. Further, I learned that the deaf community perceived that they were normal; hence, they were against any practices expressed by different people whose meaning communicated their inability to participate in verbal communication. Other members with whom I communicated in the chatroom expressed their dissatisfaction with the practices used by society in providing special learning centers to the deaf (Hauser et al. 489). Their argument was that their inability to hear or communicate verbally did not imply that they were different from the other people.

According to scholars, the deaf community embraces a culture that influences their unity in communication. Previous research indicates that the group abides by certain types of beliefs that compel them to share common values towards different subjects of life. The chatroom signing influenced the understanding that deaf people shared literary traditions and dialects (Davidson 794). Therefore, it is realistic to argue that the Deaf Culture is an institution whereby the constituent members might share different dialects in accordance to the geographical distribution. In emphasis, the Deaf Culture influences the members to grow positive attitudes toward their challenged hearing health condition.