What effect does the conversation Between tuco and his brother have on the moral vision of the fillm - Essay Example

From the movie the good the bad and the ugly 1966 by Sergio Leone, explain how the different types of life the brothers have took them to different ways, how after all they are brothers, and how this has to do with the morality of the film.In its endeavor to present one of the possibly sensational impact and occurrence in the period of the American Civil War, Sergio Leone’s “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly” exhibits how the turn of chaotic events bears the capacity to generate three types of characters who converge at the will to amass huge fortunes with the art of war regardless of culpabilities done as gunfighters.

Within the rather unlikely matchup of the ‘good’ (Blondie) portrayed by Clint Eastwood, the ‘bad’ (Angel Eyes) for Lee Van Cleef, and the ‘ugly’ (Tuco) given to Eli Wallach, the film may be recognized of the thematic attempt to depict a moral position through the character of Tuco Ramirez. Compared to the traditional approach of signifying adventure with crime via the struggle of the good against the bad, in this setting, a neutral figure is put in the middle so as to lay a perspective of viewing the film in the light of being caught within a moral thread which Tuco himself may either opt to keep or snap knowing that his wasted life has been a far cry to that of his brother Pablo.

Amidst the conspicuous desperation to hold the stolen Confederate gold worth $200,000 in acquisition, the story of “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly” is bound to confront the essence of personal transformation with reference to the role Tuco ‘the ugly’ plays. This is particularly indicated in the special scene Tuco shares with Pablo which gradually explicates how severely divergent are the separate paths they take in life leading one to become a bandit while the other a clergyman. At the onset of meeting his brother, Tuco is shown to apply an ethical mode of expressing how greatly he yearns to see and talk to Pablo.

So with an overly proper conduct and gesture, he initiates “Hey Pablo, don’t you recognize me?” and claims “I don’t know the right thing, I was just passing by here; I said to myself I wonder if my brother remembers his brother.” It were as if Tuco can be felt to have temporarily gone out of his originally mischievous self to a pleasing human outfit for the sake of delighting Pablo with his cheerful presence. On the contrary, nevertheless, the brother chooses to exercise his priesthood for the thief to be brought to a sense of remorse over the demise of their parents stating in suppressed anguish “Only now do you think of them, to begin after 9 years; Our mother has been dead a long time now; Our father died only a few days ago; That’s why I was away” then adding in an accusing tone “And you – Outside of evil, what have you managed to do?”. Instead of a mutual agreement to bury their differences and empower each other, it turns out that both of them have each built a wall of pride unto oneself that none is able to afford perceiving the good point of his sibling.

In a way, the priest falls into the weakness of looking up to his authority and judging his brother on account of the seemingly unforgivable past and unruly undertakings of the present. The bandit, however, demonstrates his weakness of having impatience on listening from a brother he thinks of as coward yet whom he could have otherwise believed to help him in the process of shifting to the dimension of righteousness. Despite these shortcomings though, one may not dismiss the good-natured behavior which Tuco manages to execute that he even becomes aware of his ample distinction of status from Pablo whom he initially reveres as far above him by virtue of profession aside from exuding spontaneous gladness and fondness in the name of brotherhood.

Apparently, Pablo is the one who must be held accountable for the mean response which eventually disillusions Tuco to deliver back punches rather than an act of reconciliation toward a change of heart apart from the old corrupt principle of living.