It should therefore be noted that most of the positive impacts that exist in the arena of the food tourism they are in close articulation with negative impacts (Rombauer 2003). The industry therefore needs to maximize the desirable impacts and minimize the undesirable ones. Economic growth is one of the most direct impacts on the food destination that food tourism can have. The food destination must ensure that the food industry they are involved in is a profitable one to continue running it. This can be further be explained by the fact that when the consumers come to the destination they are more likely to spend money that will promote other business sectors in the state.
For example, Singapore is a very attractive food destination that attracts people from all over the world thereby promoting the airline business as well as the investments sector. The wine industry would promote the agricultural sector and as a result, there is an increased economic growth (Jolley 2002). Moreover, the winery industry provides job vacancies where the farmers and other personnel work and earn a living. As a result, there are increased living standards among the people in the food destination that further lead to diversification in the exploration of the economy sectors as they can save to invest in other business sectors.
Further diversification leads to rural economic development as there is cheap labor and land availability that in return result to infrastructure development due to the need to access the remote areas (King & Morris 1997). The localization perspective scrutinizes the economic growth that is within the tourism destination solely by the activities within the governance of the state. The food tourism reduces the economic leakage that could be because of the imports and therefore the money is used in other sectors of economy.
The food tourism centers acts as ready markets for the raw materials that are required as they are bought thereby reducing the chances of wastage. Social development is the next prime contribution that the wine business has to the food tourism attraction. This is because the destination is bound to receive so many visits from different calibers of humanity especially if it is salience and has achieved the supremacy. The frequent visits lead to establishment of rapport among the involved parties therefore social growth like in the instance of treaties and the conventions between the different states.
Food tourism has a positive correlation to the social relationship between the involved states that would encompass other forms of development in return (Munshaw 2003). Education is an action that involves interaction of people that is well enhanced by the social development. For example, Singapore is well reputed for its food production that makes it almost automatic to its citizens to access the food preparation courses, actually this further boost the esteem of the state. Moreover, the industry will definitely lead to development of the social amenities like schools, communication centers and hospitals in the destination state that further boost the economy of the destination state (Anderson & Norman 2000).
Potential opportunities and difficulties in developing business networks Network is a wide range of cooperative behavior that aims at the economic as well as the social development. There are three ways in which the cooperation and the partnership operate; the wine network involves the regional operation whereby, every business operates in seclusion, as there is no coordination at all like in the case of Moldova (Kennedy 1998). The wine trails only focus on an independent sector that is not interactive.
The joint network involves a regional arena but the cooperation is well pronounced while in the network development there is a very high level of cooperation. The network development promotes better success in the food tourism sector by promotion of unity and working together often in a mutual relationship.
Read More