The revolution has been seen as the most significant inventions in the history of humans (Cook, p. 12). This is because it made it possible to put more knowledge and information into the hands of people at reduced costs in less time. Learning and literacy have since spread rapidly and widely than before. The development has had an effect on the human society created by making communication in printed forms. Learning has been made accessible to the common person. This is because the information and all forms of communication needed to be available for the common person.
The achievement of broad learning and literacy makes the story of printing revolutionary. Before print technology, oral culture existed. Storage of what is said for a long time became necessary over time. Written text was therefore, the only means of reliance. The orals form of communication and information storage were therefore, replaced by print technology. There is a strong belief since knowledge contained is believed to be accurate. The written word has replaced the spoken word. The printing press has replaced the written word.
In the modern society, the internet or computers are replacing the printing press. The revolution has also made an impact on people who use laptops, personal digital organizers and cell phones. There is constantly a disparity in the opinion among economic historians about the extent to which the new technology was a revolutionary innovation. Some described the move as a quantum jump with an argument that the innovation had begun to push down the information price. They also said that it is the western progress that should be owed much to the superior means with which information was stored and disseminated (Dittmar, 2009, p. 5). From a large-scale survey conducted, social historians have praised the innovation as having an impact and revolution on social issues.
The development and innovation brought about radical transformations in the intellectual life conditions. Historians have seen the printing technology as a facilitation of intellectual developments. This involved processes of recombining ideas and sharing them hence making intellectual skills valuable. There is an argument that via its fundamental and pervasive impact on several economic activities, the innovation may qualify as being a general-purpose technology (Dittmar, 2009, p. 6). Printing technology was then an urban technology.
This is because the printed media was mainly urban and was utilized in the urban areas. The cities and countries that adopted the innovation benefitted from them positively and localized spillovers in the accumulation of human capital. The spillovers led to growth in cities by exerting pressure on the returns of labor. This, in turn, made cities dynamic as far as culture is concerned thus attracting migrants. Migration drove city growth because high wages were offered and there were attractive economic and cultural opportunities that were available (Dittmar, 2009, p. 8). Print media played a major role in the development and acquisition of skills that were essential to businesspersons and merchants.
Print media contributed to technological change, accumulation of human capital and the spread of literacy. It fostered the emergence of competencies, dispositions and aptitudes that suited and reflected the ideal commercial environment. For merchants who were engaged in long-distance and large-scale trade, the ability to keep sophisticated accounts and numeracy were associated with better returns (Dittmar, 2009, p. 8). The new technology was mainly associated with development of an urban public sphere and the emergence of the culture of information exchange.
Print media was a trade that was widely done, but countries with a printing press had more benefits from the technology than those that did not have. The main reason here was because print media were costly to transport, sensitive to damp and heavy (Dittmar, 2009, p. 11). Despite the challenges, the innovation spread across the world, and it was adopted in no time.
Read More