The paper tells that in the critical appraisal of Matilal’s attempt to separate relativism from pluralism Goodman first questions whether ethos can exist outside a culture or community of language users which the researcher thought was a good question to consider…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
From this research it is clear that violation of another human being and to society with the taking of a life is universally wrong; it cannot be comprehended nor excused except in very few cases where violence begets violence. Warfare and the making of war between factions can be said to be racially motivated, territorial motivated, self-interest motivated, religiously motivated and politically motivated. None of these reasons present a strong enough argument to be the deciding faction which starts a conflict such as war. Responding in like becomes a very difficult position to be in for all of society. Taking quick action such as Goodman suggests would seem to be the best choice to avoid the mass murder of millions in a tense situation but look how we have responded to 9/11, a conflict that is still going on despite the death of the leader the United States initially sought. War unites and disunites people unlike any other act. Terrorist usually have a purpose or message behind their violent acts of destruction though these messages and purpose are immediately discounted when the act becomes violent and takes human lives that should be valued above all other considerations. Terrorism uses media sensation to gain national attention to a group or faction self-interested purpose, policy, religion, or idea. Media must take some responsibility in ascribing so much coverage and attention as to elicit repeats of similar behavior though citizens want to know what is going, regardless of their opinion on the issue. By our very actions we further feed the terrorist’s actions and it is a repetitious cycle....
Terrorist usually have a purpose or message behind their violent acts of destruction though these messages and purpose are immediately discounted when the act becomes violent and takes human lives that should be valued above all other considerations. Terrorism uses media sensation to gain national attention to a group or faction self-interested purpose, policy, religion, or idea. Media must take some responsibility in ascribing so much coverage and attention as to elicit repeats of similar behavior though citizens want to know what is going, regardless of their opinion on the issue. By our very actions we further feed the terrorist’s actions and it is a repetitious cycle. Human trafficking and slavery are just as deeply wrong, though I would imagine for the one being enslaved there must be periods of time that are so hateful that they are only thankful to be alive and not much else. It is pointed out that drugs, which are extremely scrutinized and resisted by the United States are sold merely once, while human beings can be sold repeatedly. Incest and human trafficking are to a much greater degree fundamentally wrong while polygamy can be situational. I disagree with Goodson’s views in this area, he uses the statement that polygamy diminishes intimacy and trust and transforms the nature of marriage which I believe that once again he is relying on language and communication as relationship factors, and societal standards which as his whole paper describes are obviously seriously out of order and frequently wrong because as a society we are extremely divide. I do not feel it is a morally wrong act to be a polygamist unless it involves minors marrying or situations that preclude to incest or child endangerment. Rape and clitoridectomy distorts
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Relativism and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/statistics/1394544-relativism-and-morality
(Relativism and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 1)
“Relativism and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/statistics/1394544-relativism-and-morality.
Goodman strongly argues that certain things are simply wrong and therefore, morality cannot be wholly relativistic. There appears to be a convergence at some point when some pertinent issues are considered. In this paper, I agree with Goodman that certain things are simply wrong irrespective of relativistic nature of morality.
It is laudable because the article stood that there are just some values and morals that does not change with time or does it depends on one’s interpretation which falls prey to the danger of convenience and laxity. The arguments asserted by Goodman were also sound and grounded on well thought reason and did not pontificate nor pretended any righteousness from any theological pulpit.
This had been observed and discussed by Lenn Goodman in the paper entitled Some Moral Minna (2010). Relativism is defined as the lack of absolute truth or validity of a particular concept of thought which can only be described in relation to other concepts, thus, is subject to the perception and view of different groups.
Name: Instructor’s Name: Course: Date of Submission: Moral relativism Moral relativism is a philosophical theory that morality, principles, ethics are relative which are culturally dependent as well count on an individual’s choice. This morality is not absolute, it does not hold for all people at any place and it depends on time and situation too.
These questions have been tied up with the subjectivity of man and how the interpretations of modern realities take shape. It also depends to a great extent on how the conceptions of god have evolved. If one looks at the ethics and morality of the Western civilization, one can see that the Judaeo-Christian frameworks have influenced the frameworks of morality to a great extent.
The author states that from the Christian philosophical perspective, self interest aspect is viewed as self love or duty to self or saving one’s soul or other aspects but this does not necessarily mean that people should refuse to share with others. Sharing is one way of fulfilling self interest since it can help in saving other people.
theory in philosophy connotes that “there is no single true morality” because what is “moral right and wrong are always relative to a choice of moral framework” (Harman & Thomson, 1996). It has two forms, ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism (“Moral
However, these meaning differs from the Rachel’s understanding of the cultural relativity. To him, he views the cultural relativity as an attitude of objectivity towards another culture.
The major believes of the cultural relativism is not a single doctrine but
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Relativism and Morality"
with a personal 20% discount.