Philosophies Applied in a Hospital Context - Admission/Application Essay Example

? Philosophies Applied in a Hospital Context Ethical Philosophies The reason why the hospital was chosen is the current ethical predicaments in the contemporary health care centers. These predicaments occur due to various causes which include the concentration on personal (patient) entitlements and selection, the growth of new technology, the impact of international rationing systems, increasing costs, inadequacy of resources, the tentative or disagreeing societal and spiritual values, and the dynamic associations between payer, giver, and the sick. In current’s quickly dynamic healthcare firm, ethical matters have come to symbolize both problems and opportunities. The reasons why hospitals need an oversight ethics committee are: 1. Fundamental Devotion to Patients: Every health center is devoted to offering value care that is receptive, empathetic, punctually delivered, and cost efficient. The mission of health care centers charges them to be devoted to the care and enhancement of human living. 2. Accreditation of Healthcare Centers: Accreditation is as well a momentum for sustaining an efficient clinical ethics commission. For instance, the Joint Commission’s section talking about the Rights and Responsibilities of the person constitute the below standards: a. The hospital honors the patient’s entitlement to take part in decisions concerning their care, cure, and services. b. The hospital honors the patient’s educational and individual values, faiths, and preferences. c. The institution addresses the sick’s decisions concerning care, cure, and services got at the termination of living (Rachels, 2012). The Ethics of Virtue Virtue morals concentrate on the type of an individual one must be, and its concentration is on character mannerisms. James Rachel studies virtue-founded hypotheses on the morality of the type exemplified by Aristotle, comparing them with deed or duty-founded hypotheses, of the type exemplified by Mill or Kant (Soccio, 2013). Rachel claims that a purely founded morality should all the time be incomplete; because it would not on its own justify the reason certain character mannerisms are ethically good. The proponents of this hypothesis include Xenophanes a Greek philosopher who concentrated particularly in the culturally comparative state of spiritual faiths, other than ethical faiths per se. Pyrrho is another proponent philosopher and argues that in ethical issues, people may not identify if anything is correctly good or bad, and, thus, people should hang ruling. Sextus is the last one and explains that ethical mannerisms vary so much from one society to another. The two principles of this philosophy are cultural relativism and Morality and the Will of God. The cultural Relativism principle applies in a hospital in that it helps people know the value and the effects of some moral practices, like genital mutilation for girls. The second principle of Morality and the Will of God applies in a hospital in that moral practices like going to a health center when not feeling well should not be contradicted with the faith that God heals the sick, thus fail to seek medication. Then the will of God should not be contradicted since God always does what is right and the human beings themselves are creations of God’s will (Rachels, 2012). Happiness and the Virtue Virtue ethics stresses the function of one’s character and the Virtues that a person’s character embodies for identifying or assessing moral behavior. Virtue ethics is among the three main advances to normative ethics, regularly compared to dentology, which stresses responsibility to policies and consequentilaism that extracts rightness or wrongness from the result of the deed itself. The proponents of this philosophy include Socrates and Plato. Socrates is one of the greatest philosophers who left things hanging for his students to discover their own means of truth. He argued on life after death but did not give any conclusions. Plato on his part, being Socrates student claimed that human heart comprises of three sections: the reason, the will, and the desire. He argues that happiness is the driver of everything and the core to establishing a happy society. The principles of this philosophy are Divide Command, which argues that God commanded from above everything and human beings should only adhere; and Meta-ethical realism, which postulates the presence of ethical absolutes that make a deed ethical, no matter the situations. The principles apply to decisions made in a hospital in that people hospitalized should do what will bring them happiness and what is right according to God’s command and leave the rest (Aristotle, 2007). Tradition and the Virtues Maclntyre urges people to recall where morals came from. People require to know the historical background of morals. Maclntyre does not like “quandary ethics” where hypothesis are evaluated through viewing at implausible quandaries. Nevertheless, he does desire morals to carry out its work and inform people the way they must stay their lives. The two principles used here are relative value principle and internal and external goods principle. The relative principle stresses that distinct communities have distinct values, and they reform with time (MacIntyre, 2009). Internal and external goods focus on internal goods as virtues qualities of nature. Practices carried out by people and the physical things are internal and external goods. The proponents of this philosophy include Ben Franklin who had thought that people must attempt to introduce concerning the highest good for the highest figure. Another one is Philippa Foot who thinks that goodness must be viewed like the natural thriving of humans like living things. The principles apply to decisions made in a hospital in that people even when seeking medical cure, doctors must know their background and the practices, which helps them identify issues like hereditary diseases (Lutz, 2009). Detrimental theory Social contract theory In the social contract theory, morality is seen like precisely flowing from a first common treaty. Social contractarians resist any ethical power imposed through the government, God, the household, and others. The proponents of this philosophy are Thomas Hobbes, who claims that individuals in condition of nature and terrified and gluttonous. The other one is John Locke, who argued that individuals with the condition of nature are independent and comparatively passive. The main principles applied in the social contact philosophy include: A definition of the original stance or condition of nature Thinking promoting the conclusions concerning ethical principles made through the inhabitants of the original site (Schrems, 2007). This philosophy is detrimental to decisions made in a hospital since some decisions go contrary to beliefs and social contract philosophy does not advocate for that. This will cause a conflict because of the way of doing things about individuals in the society and the findings or instructions from the hospital. References Aristotle . (2007). The Nicomachean ethics. United States: Filiquarian Pub. Lutz, C. S. (2009). Tradition in the ethicsof alasdair macintyre: Relativism, thomism, and philosophy. Lanham: Lexington Books. MacIntyre, A. C. (2009). God, philosophy, universities: A selective history of the Catholic philosophical tradition. Lanham, Md: Sheed and Ward Book/Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Rachels, S., & Rachels, J. (2012). The elements of moral philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill. Schrems, J. J. (2007). Understanding principles of politics and the state. Lanham, Md: University Press of America. Soccio, D. J. (2013). Archetypes of wisdom: An introduction to philosophy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning. Read More