Nobody downloaded yet

Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
What is relativisms? Is relativism defensible? Contents Introduction 3 Moral Relativism 4 Ethical Relativism 7 Cultural Relativism 9 Cognitive Relativism 12 Conclusion 14 Reference 15 Introduction The concept of relativism does not bear any absolute validity, as the subjective value of the concept may be different for different people based on their consideration and perception…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights"

Download file to see previous pages According to the anthropological relativism is a way of understanding the cultural biases based on the behaviours and beliefs of the local inhabitants. This relativism avoids ethnocentrism, i.e., thinking that one’s own culture is the best with respect to others. On the other hand, philosophical relativism is the sceptic notion about the proposition of truth based on the person interpreting it because this kind of relativism does not arrive at any cultural or moral consensus. Normative relativism is an approach mainly adopted by the philosophers whereas anthropologists engage in descriptive relativism. Thus in descriptive relativism, description of the different thought process and the reasoning are made by the anthropologist but they do not provide the evaluation of the same. However, in case of normative relativism the philosophers concentrate more on the evaluation of the claims made through different reasoning or modes of thought. Thus the values of truth are defines through normative relativism on a much broader prospect. Therefore the essay aims to discuss the meaning of relativism and whether they are defensible. To analyse the study four types of relativism has been identified and the easy deals with moral relativism, moral relativism, cultural relativism and cognitive relativism. Each of the relativism has its own theory, believes and practises against the individuals and society as a whole. Moral Relativism Moral relativism is the philosophical theory which states that morality is relative and it holds different moral for different people. Moral relatives are further divided into two forms, ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism. Ethical subjectivism believes that morality is based on individual and cultural relativism is relative to culture. According to the theory of moral relativism it do not makes any sense to ask questions which are abstracts such as whether an act is good or bad. There seems to no badness or goodness in abstract it only exists in specified context. An act may be bad for one set of person whereas the same act may be seen to be right for another set of people. Thus if moral relativism is true one should not act whether the act is good or bad but only judge the act in a particular situation. Some tends to see moral relativism as obvious truth and undeniable whereas other views it as threatening the foundation on which the society is founded (Lukes, 2011, p. 14-23). For some moral relativism, it follows logically from cognitive relativism which tends to relativize the truth in general context. A common but negative reason for embracing moral relativism is the perceived ability of moral objectivism. A more defensible argument against social relativism is that it aims to promote tolerance as it encourages others to understand the different culture (IEP, 2012). There are three kinds of moral relativism, normal moral relativism where different people act as agents and are subject to different ultimate requirements; secondly, Moral Judgment Relativism where moral judgments tend to make implicit reference to speaker or other person, example like subjectivism. And finally it is the Meta Ethical Relativism, where there exist conflicting moral judgments on a particular case. According to Harman, one can hold either of the one while rejecting the other two. Emotivists might accept the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights Essay)
“Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights

Cultural Relativism

..., and hierarchies, but it fails to take a stand on the morality of the practice in universal teams, believing that the question is beyond the anthropological or scientific method. (Glazer, 1996) Thus, in this manner it can be argued that foot-binding was so widely accepted of a practice, that it was not immoral because it was the common, accepted basis of society. In this sense, there are no universals, only cultural and moral relativism in patterns of human evolution. However, looking at description from the girls themselves, who describe their motivations at the time, it is clear that many girls opposed it themselves, in their own minds and suffering,...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Cultural relativism to be evaluated on the basis of its own values and norms of behavior and not on the basis of those of another culture or ethnic group” (Rosado, 1994). The customs, for example practiced by many cultures and religions such as infanticide, human sacrifice or self-mutation are considered right in those particular cultures and religions, while at the same time they are abhorred in other societies. In cultural relativism there is considered no concept of universal truths. The relativists claim that since every culture has its own distinct and diverse moral and ethical codes therefore there...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Cultural Relativism

...? Cultural Relativism Cultural relativism refers to the individuality of cultures, their customs, ethics and beliefs. All cultures, as defined by cultural relativism, are entitled to their own way of doing things without being judged by others, because cultures have different moral standards. All cultures are also entitled to their own believes, in addition to having equal value. Cultural relativism as a concept also explains why it is right for a particular society to do something while it is morally wrong for another society to do the same thing. For example, it is considered morally wrong for a Muslim to eat pork while for person from another religion, eating pork has no negative impact on his/her morals. Cultural diversity... also...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Cultural Relativism be made. In assessing the nature of cultural relativism, William C. Shepherd, an Associate Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Montana, in his work titled "Cultural Relativism, Physical Anthropology, and Religion", seeks to offer insight into this, as well as a broader look at cultural study and understanding. The most powerful way to move beyond the intellectual bankruptcy contributed to the social scientific study of religion by cultural relativism is to defend a version of innate ideas embedded in a biogenetic account of how religion and culture evolved in...
6 Pages(1500 words)Book Report/Review

An human rights be universal

...of the heart-it is simply his duty". (The Portable Nietzsche, p.647) However while the concept of universal human rights is gaining popularity, it had not always been so- not even within the United States. Nearly fifty years ago that American Anthropological Association emphatically rejected "the applicability of any Declaration of Human Rights to mankind as a whole." (Preis) Though Western thinkers may no longer accept the contention "that other people's truths are contained in their own classifications and understanding," and that no one culture offers a "self-evidently privileged standard of verity", Asian leaders still have a long...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Cultural Relativism

...but is not universally acceptable. If relativism should be insisted through those practices, it will just imply the justification of things that might harm humans or in some extent would mean their death. Every cultures might have their own good sides, but human concern should not be bounded in a relativist point of view that what is good is relative. Good things remains to be good without looking after any cultural background. And if culture exist, then respect and tolerance should always remain on adhering to humane considerations. Respect of one’s belief is a responsibility of the scholar of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Universal Human Rights

...Universal Human Rights of the of the of the The Human Rights Commission was established in the year 1947 by the United Nations (UN). Its task was to draft the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Several countries sent their representatives to take part in this process. The UN adopted the UDHR on 10 December 1948. The aims of the UDHR are to promote freedom, justice and peace in the world. This is to be achieved by the universal recognition and respect for human rights. Some of these are the civil, cultural, economic and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Cultural relativism Affiliation Moral Relativism Introduction Moral relativism described as the view that morally based judgments are correct or right about a given standpoint. For example, two individuals may argue differently on the issue of wife battering in the society. While each of them has concrete reasons to support their arguments, there is no unique judgment made since each person views that they are right and the other one is wrong depending on their moral standpoint. Moral relativism does not support a particular argument but ensures that the judgments made on the basis of an individual’s morality are true according to that person’s moral standpoint (Russ...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Cultural Relativism

...CULTURAL RELATIVISM AS A MORAL THEORY [Insert al Affiliation] The ostensible fact that other people’s tastes does not coincide withour own does not make them imprudent, ignorant or evil. He proves it further by pointing out that if other people button their shirts from bottom up instead of top down, that does not in any way mean they are deranged. According to Nkeonye (1994), relative definition of cultural relativism dictates that it’s a philosophical doctrine which informs us that all proper moral standards are derived from culture; a definition echoed among publications associated with the subject. Whereas the word itself in layman’s dialect means all cultures are equal and no culture is above another, and we should tolerate... the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Cultural Relativism

...Cultural Relativism Cultural relativism is generally the attitude of society’s mores and ideas that is viewed within the framework of society’s problem and opportunity. It is simply stated as a belief that a particular society has no right to place over its own values and cultures onto another society. However, these meaning differs from the Rachel’s understanding of the cultural relativity. To him, he views the cultural relativity as an attitude of objectivity towards another culture. The major believes of the cultural relativism is not a single...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights for FREE!

Contact Us