Organizational Behaviour in the Sport Industry - Essay Example

Organizational behaviour in the sport industry Introduction Top of Form The core objective of this essay is toassess how much this unit has had an impact on me in relation to organization behaviour in the sports industry. The essay outlines personality differences that many people tend to have and what motivates them while working in different organizations. I have gone ahead to explain how different theories have been put forward to explain organizational behaviour. I have utilized information from written articles and academic books about organizational behaviour to review this topic. To me, and in fact most of the authors whose work I have looked at agree that bureaucracy stands out as most effective system to be used in organizations. I have shown how true this is but it does not mean that the rest of the theories do not count. According to (Cook, 2014) organizations should be able to identify a specific organizational system to work with but must incorporate concepts from other systems too. This unit has given me a new look at how organizations like in the sporting industries are equally affected by different behaviours of both the organizations and the individuals within the organizations. According to (Musgrave and Raj, 2009) the sports industry is complex and made up of so many stakeholders. All these stakeholders have different interests and needs. Until I undertook this unit, I did not know the extent in which individual behaviours contributed in the operations of the organization. My initial understanding was that people are used to following the strict policies, guidelines and structures put in any organization. With this thought, I assumed that people in such organization never use their personalities and behaviours while executing their duties. In truth, this has been my fear for a long time. The fear was that in future, my career might be very stressing and hectic because my personalities and behaviours will be limited to me alone and cannot show this in the workplace. According to (Fiske, 2010) people are social beings and eliminating this aspect may be difficult. The social aspect of our lives has to be incorporated in all our lives including our workplaces. The thing about our social life is that it only becomes relevant and interesting because of our differences in terms of our perception about life, ideas and any other concept of life. The incorporation of these difference personalities is what helps organizations do well. This unit has brought into my realization that there exist two main forms of individual differences, which are personality and motivation. This concept did not only capture my attention, it is also played a key role in making me understand the nature, consequences and determinants of individual differences in personality and the role it plays organizational behaviour. The unit has given clear explanation about the different personality by giving two perspectives; Ideographic and nomothetic. Before I went through this unit, I knew such a difference existed but I did not even have a name for such difference or even have ability to explain what it meant. It was just a concept in the mind. However, this unit has helped me understand that idiographic perspectives tend to be subjective and puts emphasis on getting the details of a concept. On the other hand, nomothetic tends to generalize concepts and ideas. These perspectives play a key role in developing an individual’s personality. According to (Baumeister and Bushman, 2014) people’s personality explains why some people act the way they do and why each person differs so much from the other. Before this unit, I knew that every part of our personality is fixed to be the way it is. I now know that personality of individuals is determined both by a series of factors mainly based on nature and nurture. According to (Matthews et al., 2009) majority of peoples personalities can be linked to those of their parents whereas some of it is as a result of experiences they had while growing up. I can now confidently confirm that my personality is nomothetic in nature. I like getting the general overview of ideas other than go deeper into details. In many ways this has affected me even in my academics. Most of the times I do not give much of attention to instructions given to us in class by the tutor as this lead to failure even in exams. As I mentioned earlier, motivation is the other factor that makes people differ. Through the unit I realized that there are in fact a series of theories of motivation that are applicable within business organizations. There are two theories that explain motivation; process and content. Process explains how while content explains what. This unit has made me realize the importance of organizations to identify factors that influence motivation. This would be significant in improving the performance of the organization. Employee motivation and moral support have a very crucial role to play when it comes to improving an organizations productivity. If any organization wants to maintain its competitiveness in any industry, motivation to the employees and staff is important. I have always been motivated by process. I like having the whole express of an activity even more than the contents of the activities in an event. I like travelling and the experience of going to new place even in the most hostile and remote places that other people would find unwelcoming. This has negative impact on me since I get to acquire unique experiences. This unit has outlined a number of theories that have been used to explain the organizational theories. With this understanding, solutions can now be reached regarding how one can incorporate individuals with so much personality differences. According to (Draft and Marcic, 2013) the difference in personalities if well utilized can be turned into a very powerful tool for any organization. These differences will give the organization different angles about difference issues. The unit explains that there several organizational theories and they include Bureaucratic, Scientific management and finally classical theory. The three theories have been applied by many organizations but their effectiveness differs depend on the structures, cultures and nature of the organization among others. The thing about these theories is that are able to create structures and systems that will cooperate and monitor individuals putting into consideration their personality differences as well as what motivates them more to deliver. Satisfying the needs of employees and meeting their interest can be a challenge to any organization. This is because people are different, with different personalities, perceptions and hence different interests. Bureaucracy theory in my opinion is the most effective theory particularly in the sports industry. This theory is known apply rational-legal authority to the organization of work and this is what makes bureaucracy the most technically efficient and effective form of organization. The unit explains that bureaucracy cuts across all organization. According to (Shaffer, 2009) all organization must be able to apply a sufficient amount of bureaucracy for it to be successful. The theory is known mainly to work formal organizational hierarchy characterised with rules and guidelines. Organization is based functional expertise and specialty. The individuals working within such organizations are selected based on their skills as well as technical qualifications. With bureaucracy, different people in an organization with different personalities can be incorporated in different departments and work without any conflict. Individuals who are nomothetic would fit in the top management of an organization since most of them do not pay much of attention to details. The lower departments could be allocated to individuals with idiographic personality since they are people who have the characteristic of wanting to know details and reasons for an occurrence. Prior to this unit, I had negative impression towards the term bureaucracy. To me, it was a term to be associated with exploitation and misuse of power. But through the unit that has changed. I now understand how bureaucracy has an impact on me. As a person with nomothetic personality, bureaucracy affects me in many ways. This theory is characterised with structures and systems that are hierarchy in nature. Majority of people in the top level of a bureaucratic system tend to be nomothetic since they are more interested with the general and overviews of a situation other than go into details. This is formed by specifying and outlining the duties and responsibilities for each staff. With such a plan, the chances of conflict due to difference in personality will have been reduced as people will be limited to doing their responsibilities. The system also sets reporting relationships by use of a command hierarchy. This means that the employees, regardless of your differences, have to report a particular person. According to (Sinha, 2012) bureaucracy as an organizational system is very effective especially in situations where an organization deals with diverse and multiple differences. In conclusion, I can say that individual has a difference either in personality or motivation in whatever they do. Personality perspectives that can be used to show this difference are idiographic or nomothetic perspective. These two perspectives mainly affect how people view different concepts. Idiographic individuals tend to focus on explanations and elaboration of the details and the specifics. The nomothetic on the other hand are more concerned with the general idea and generalizing of concepts and ideas. People are equally motivated differently and the organizations needs to understand what motivates it people (content) and how it motivates them (how). In many ways, this unit has developed me and given me a new insight about my own behaviour. I have been able to understand why I do some things that I did not have explanations before. With the understanding of my nomothetic personality, I can now see how to incorporate ideographic personality in order to improve my areas of weakness. This does not mean that nomothetic personality is inferior to ideographic. Both are equally significant and the use of both will be very instrumental to me. Bibliography BAUMEISTER, R. F., & BUSHMAN, B. J. (2014) Social psychology and human nature Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning COOK, B. J. (2014). Bureaucracy and self-government: reconsidering the role of public administration in American politics. DAFT, R. L., & MARCIC, D. (2013) Understanding management Australia, South-Western Cengage Learning FISKE, S. T. (2010). Social beings: a core motives approach to social psychology. Hoboken, NJ, J. Wiley MATTHEWS, G., DEARY, I. J., & WHITEMAN, M. C. (2009) Personality traits Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press RAJ, R., & MUSGRAVE, J. (2009) Event management and sustainability Wallingford, UK, CABI Top of Form Top of Form SHAFFER, D. R. (2009) Social and personality development Australia, Wadsworth/Cengage Learning Top of Form SINHA, H. (2012). Bureaucracy and rural development in Mizoram. New Delhi, Concept Pub. Co Top of Form Top of Form Top of Form Top of Form Top of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Read More