Download file to see previous pages...
Below these caste systems, India had the Dalits or the Untouchables, while Japan had the Burakumin or Hinin. In both cases of people below the system, they were socially unacceptable to the rest of the society because they traditionally did unclean jobs, such as being undertakers, tanning leather or butchering.
However, a look at these two countries today shows that there is a stark difference in the way they deal with their class systems. Sadly, in India, the caste system is as prevalent as the discrimination of minorities in most countries. In Japan, such classes are no longer used to divide people. As a matter of fact, Japan and India are not only poles apart when it comes to their social systems, but even in their economic and social stability. Today, it would be hard to find a person being discriminated against because they are descendants of the Burakumin people or leaving in a Burakumin neighborhood. In India, Dalits get discriminated against even in this century (Shah, 2012).
The social classes seem to exist in almost all societies in the world because there will always be a group that gets persecuted economically or socially. Even in developed countries classes still exist as can be seen by the treatment of minorities. However, one thing that is admirable about the 21st century Japan is that it does not exhibit deep religious, ethnic and class divisions as compared to India or any other country in the world. Today, most Japanese people see themselves as a classless society (Karan, 2010). Perhaps the only divisions notable in Japan today have their links on the socialization processes between the seniors and the young. The seniors are important decision makers and are greatly respected, an example that all other states should strive to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This paper sought to offer insights about the relationship of social stratification and racial inequality. This is undertaken through presenting a summary and analysis of Dixon’s article. Lastly, the paper discusses the relationship of stratification and racial inequality according to Functionalist and Conflict perspectives.
“Social stratification”, Macionis observes, “is a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy.” (2008, p.254) Ethno-racial background, religion and socioeconomic position include the most dominant indicators of social stratification.
Social class also refers to a concept that centers on various models of social stratification where people are put together in groups of hierarchical categories of social standing with the main ones being lower, middle, and upper class. A social class refers to a set of persons who are in a similar position economically (Levine, 2010).
Social stratification leads to social inequality where some groups of people stand higher in social ranking, control scarce resources, have wield power and receive special treatment. There are four main stratification systems and they include the caste system, slavery, open class and the estate system.
Weber has given the three component theory of stratification based on class, status and party or politics. In this stratification class is an economical factor while status and politics are non economical factors. It includes the relationship between employer and employee, renter and owner and others.
has provided me with a basis to identify with people belonging to a certain class, on the other hand, it has eradicated the equality at all levels which has its own negative implications.
My life would have been worse if I had been living in a caste-based system instead of a
It was thereby revealing and illuminating that, as disclosed by Rothman and citing Gallo and Gallo (2002), “it might seem cynical to express sympathy for the children of the new rich, but some do experience real psychological
The article further explains the division of status within different positions of a particular society and even places emphasis on the factors that cause and promote inequality. The article does not refer to the status of
At the cellular level, the malformation is associated with abnormalities of chromosomes with trisomy 21, 18 and 13. Tetralogy of the fallot can also be associated with chromosome 22 and microdeletions. There is a 3 percent risk of recurrence of in families. Some untreated
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Social Stratification Journal 3 for FREE!