Smoking Ban - Case Study Example

The state and its representative have taken an oath to make rules and regulations in order to protect its citizens and thus they have a duty of care to protect the citizens. Based on these principles, the state should implement such laws in order to protect its citizens from the harmful effects of cigarette smoking. 3. One alternative to a total smoking ban as discussed in the case is the allocation of a separate area to the smokers so they can smoke without disturbing or risking the health of others.

Organizations such as restaurants and bars can develop a separate area for those smokers who want to smoke and for those who do not smoke. Secondly, a total ban on smoking in enclosed areas and the allowance of smoking in open areas can even be a useful option. 4. There are various steps that the law has dictated that can be taken by an organization to demotivate employees from smoking within the premises of the organization. These steps include the exhibition of signs on the entrance of the organization that state that on-premises smoking is not allowed.

Secondly, signs should even be placed on the door of the areas where smoking is permitted. These guidelines have been clearly stipulated in the laws of the California Indoor Clean Air Act that was enacted during the period of 1976 (Smoking.uslegal.com, 2014).5. Cigarette smoking should not be banned completely or cigarette smoking should not be considered as an illegal act. This is because if the state makes cigarette smoking illegal, they will be taking away the citizen’s natural right of freedom to decide what is good and what is bad for them.

Secondly, cigarette smoking is an addiction and has various negative health effects associated with it when smokers try to quit smoking. Due to this cigarette smoking should continue to be legalized with certain conditions such as a ban on cigarette smoking in certain areas and measures such as taxes levied on cigarettes to discourage cigarette smoking.