Smokers of the substance become addicted to it because it has a high level of nicotine. Since smoking has severe health and economic consequences, it is necessary to have smoke-free laws.
Smoke-free laws are…
Download file to see previous pages...
Thus, a ban on smoking would fail (Proctor). However, if smoke-free laws are enforced, premature deaths can be reduced because many people would refrain from the habit. Indeed, intensive smoking that is associated with severe health consequences can be avoided if strict smoking laws are enforced (ACS CAN 5).
Smoke-free laws are also appropriate because they reduce the number of smokers in a country. This can happen in two ways. First, smokers will have limited places where they can smoke freely. Since comprehensive smoking laws prohibit smoking in public places, many smokers will be forced to quit the habit. As a result, there will be a decrease in the number of active smokers in within a country. Second, young people who would otherwise become smokers will not have the opportunity to do so. Normally, when young people start smoking, they do so in places where there are no family members. Public places provide an ideal environment for starting the smoking habit (Guilfoyle). Opponents of smoke-free laws argue that tough smoking rules would encourage smoking in hazardous environments, potentially endangering the lives of smokers (Proctor). However, with smoke-free laws, prospective smokers will not have anywhere to start the habit (Guilfoyle).
In addition, smoke-free laws are appropriate because they decrease health costs. Health costs are incurred by smokers and nonsmokers. Smokers are at a higher risk of developing smoking-related illnesses. Smoking can also worsen other chronic conditions such as asthma. Nonsmokers can develop health complications such as chest pain, stroke, and asthma from secondhand smoking. They can also increase their chances of contracting lung cancer. Opponents of smoke-free laws argue that although there may be a decrease in health costs, there will still be severe economic consequences. For instance, several multi-billion dollar cigarette industries would close down
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
However, drugs and smoking are not the solution of any problem, but are the reason of upcoming health and psychological problems. Smoking has been declared as a more severe risk to human life than other addictions. A question has been raised, as a society, what can we do to prevent tobacco from raging death on so many people?
A plan to facilitate mortgage refinancing plan in order to rescue the housing market was the focal point for Obama administration. Since October 24th, a strong push by the Federal housing Finance agency is being conducted to let lenders borrow at lower rates.
It helps people relax, provides income for governments through taxes that contribute in many ways to the public purse". Introduction In the United States alone, it is estimated that almost 45 million people- or 21% of the adult population, smokes on a regular basis.
The passive smoking is the primary factor for banning the smoking in the public areas. The passive smoking starts when a person inhaled the other person's exhaled or ambient smoke from the cigarette or cigar.
Various studies have already concluded that the passive smoking is also very dangerous for human health even some researches state that a passive smoker and an actual smoker are equally exposed to the risk associated to the tobacco smoking..
However, the main reason why cigarette smoking should be banned from public places is that its smoke, also called passive smoke, can caused harm to those near the smoker or within the enclosed vicinity. Inhaling smoke from a cigarette smoker will cause similar health problems as the smoker will have.
The dangers of smoking are not new to mankind. The first hint that smoking was a health hazard dates as far back as the 18th century according to experts but it wasn’t until the 1920’s that serious research began about the hazards of smoking to health. Even then researchers had concerns about the hazards of smoking as they pertained to second hand smoke and people who inhaled it(Comfort pp 14).
According to the paper a smoking ban in all public places is a good method for both preventing new smokers from starting and helping existing smokers quit. This ban is necessary due to the health risks associated with smoking, the negative social aspects of smoking and the efficient administration of the law at the state or federal level. The health risks associated with smoking have bee known for many years but have only been widely accepted for the past few decades.
nd takes аwаy from them their freedom; on the other hand, however not banning it is unfair to the nоnѕmоkerѕ and puts our health in danger making it unѕаfe for us to go to public places where there are ѕmоkerѕ. This is quite understandable that ѕmоkerѕ have certain
These are not the only sources of smoke in the environment as one important source of smoke these days is primarily considered to be a direct action of human beings. This source is from the cigarettes that the human beings use to produce smoke in the
The usefulness of human actions gives a sense of satisfaction, identical to the concept of happiness. Usefulness is able to bring prosperity, profit, pleasure, goodness and happiness (Driver, 2009). His successor, John Stuart Mill paid special