Social Regularities - Article Example

 Social RegularitiesSocial regularities are how people comprehend and how the meaning is passed from one generation to the other. Moreover, it is how customs, standards, ethics, opinions and lifestyle of the community move from an individual to another individual. It is a practice of social relations among and amongst people and all existing things. The beliefs that are existing in a specific individual are the yields of an informal social control. It is implemented by the society without pressingly using the rules.

People or rather individual are involved willfully or subconsciously. Through this custom of socialization, the individual adopts these behaviors and norms. Traditional society uses mostly informal social control set in its accustomed culture depending on the socialization of its members to create social order. Religious conviction is thought of by some as a mutual and traditionally recognized form of informal social control. More solidly organized communities may place greater confidence on formal contrivances (Revenson, 2002).

According to Lopez (2003), irrationality is a source of social regularities as discussed in Weber’s legitimate orders. Weber’s legitimate orders state that, the practice that is believed in by a community from a reason of convenience is unstable than one sustained on a purely habitual basis. The irrationality occurs mostly especially in the course of social life and is not determined or alienated by any form or belief which is held valid. They do not rest on customs but completely on the fact that they are a consistent type of social action, and it is in the nature of the case best altered to the normal interest of individual as they are aware of them.

Some social regularities are the intended consequences of a person’s action while others are the unintended consequences of conscious individual action. There are three ways that are alternatives to these observed regularities. The three ways include; first creating new social regularities; when the new social regularities succeed they may result to change in ecological system theory. The other way is by making the existing regularities known to the society; this is the most effective way of making awareness that leads to interrupted change in the existing social regularity for ages.

The final way is by alternating the existing social regularities which are considered not possible because of the high cost incurred. It is, in fact, considered impossible.ReferencesLópez, J. (2003). Society and its metaphors: Language, social theory and social structure.London: Continuum.Revenson, T. A. (2002). A quarter century of community psychology: Readings from theAmerican journal of community psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic.