Similarities and Differences between Structural Functionalisms, Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interactionism - Essay Example

Comments (2) Cite this document
This essay explores the similarities and differences between structural functionalism, conflict theory and symbolic interactionism as some of the sociological theories which try to explain the behaviors of a society from different angles…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
Similarities and Differences between Structural Functionalisms, Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interactionism
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Similarities and Differences between Structural Functionalisms, Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interactionism"

Download file to see previous pages The present research has identified that structural functionalism is a macro level sociological theory which focuses on structures and institutions in a society on a large scale. It formulates its principles by viewing the society as a whole. All the elements or parts of the society are independent as well as interrelated, according to this theory. Individuals constitute families, and families constitute societies. However, individuals have different roles in the family and society. For example, an individual could be a son/daughter, husband/wife, or brother/sister in a family. On the other hand, the same individual could be a friend, leader, or professional in the society. Obama is the husband of Michel whereas he is the leader of all Americans. In other words, Obama is an independent person; at the same time, he is interrelated to many things in the society. Structural functionalism studies these independent and interrelated elements of people in the society. Karl Marx is one of the major contributors to the conflict theory. “Marx believed that he could study history and society scientifically and discern tendencies of history and the resulting outcome of social conflicts”. “Class, for Marx, is rooted in social relations of production, and cannot be referred in the first place to relations of distribution and consumption or their ideological reflections” (Slaughter). Marx’s conflict theory can be made clearer using the following example. Imagine the living standards of a manager and an ordinary worker working in the same company. The worker would definitely compare his standard of living with that of the manager. He may develop a feeling that irrespective of his hard work, the manager or the company is not delivering enough salary or incentives to him. Such a thought will create a sense of dissatisfaction in his/her mind, and he/she may join trade unions to fight for his/her rights. It should be noted that the objective of the organization or the manager is to derive the maximum out of the employee by giving him/her the least salary possible whereas that of the worker is to achieve maximum salary with minimum efforts. These two contrasting interests often lead towards conflicts. Like the structural functionalism theory, the conflict theory is a macro level theory. It focusses on institutions, structures, and hierarchies in the society. This theory argues that society consists of different interests groups competing for limited resources. It should be noted that the community resources are limited in number, but all the groups in the society are fighting for the control of limited resources. For example, America can accommodate only one government at a time. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Similarities and Differences between Structural Functionalisms, Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Similarities and Differences Between Structural Functionalisms, Essay)
“Similarities and Differences Between Structural Functionalisms, Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 2 times
Comments (2)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
hprice added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
The structure is excellent, and the paper covers the topic pretty good. I only wonder why it is shared for free? Will you chance everybody who downloads it to kill? Many thanks from me too!
tayyaba added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as

I liked that you gave the definitions for each term, mentioned in the topic. Usually, when writing, we somehow omit the descriptions and start from listing the differences themselves. I didn’t know the differences between structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism. I didn’t even know they could stand in one row for comparison, for they seemed to be the terms which are not related. Thanks for sharing!

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Similarities and Differences between Structural Functionalisms, Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interactionism

Sociology Theory of Symbolic Interactionism

...the interacting persons or participants in a profound manner. Symbolic interactionism as an approach pictures the social interaction between or among persons in terms of their subjective meanings or experiences (Orbuch, 1997). That is, the interpersonal process is fluid in which the participants or subjects change or modify their behavior, expression, and other physical gestures based from the meanings that are made from such interaction. On the other hand, the usage of symbolic-interactionism approach has implication to the understanding pertaining to the social structure in general. Coser cites the dilemma inherent in the paradigm of...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Structural Theory of Conflict

...April 15, Structural Theory of Conflict Sociological perspectives can be broadly divided into two main branches: structuralists or positivists and interpretivists. The structuralists include the functionalists and the conflict perspectives relating to the theories of Karl Marx. Marxism has been extremely influential amongst the perspectives in sociology especial where criminology is concerned. In criminology Marxist explanations have shifted slightly from the traditional Marxist approach to much more thinned-down approach. Marxist traditional approach is commonly referred to as left idealism by critics because it was considered more ideal and less...
11 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper

Symbolic Interactionism Theory

.... Hence, implying that what one esteems and comprehends regarding a certain aspect will remain and no external impact of the societal fabric would create a diverse, significant consequence. Critics argue that the concept is an outline of theories. Hence, implying in its application and study lacks basis because due to other concepts inclusion, hence serve a central role in its structure. This makes the theory incapable of handling social structures and related aspects especially those that are macro. Symbolic Interactionism tends to be limited within a region where its interpretations abound while derailing the external relations, hence...
3 Pages(750 words)Term Paper

Symbolic Interactionism

...Due Theory: Symbolic Interaction Theory (Mead and Blumer) Word Count: 817 Applying Symbolic Interaction Theory to Personal Experiences Society is made up of individuals’ subjective interpretation and belief. This is the main premise of the symbolic interaction theory. This theory focuses on the symbolic meaning that individuals create and use during social interaction. Symbolic interactionism understands society by focusing on the subjective meanings that individuals assign to behaviors, occurrences, and objects. Such subjective meanings are emphasized...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Symbolic interactionism

...Symbolic Interactionism According to Mead theory of Symbolic Interactionism, people assign meaning to people, things, and events based on the understanding towards them. Symbolic interactionism refers to the signs and a language a person use in the expectation of a response from the other person. Although I have experienced symbolic interactionism in different aspects of life, the most palpable experience came about when organizing a cloth donation campaign. My friends and I decided to form a cloth donation group to help the poor people in Senegal. Our group known as the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Symbolic Interactionism in Police Culture

...understands it or not the police and other law officials utilize a very symbolic structure in their profession, often looking for factors in the environment, and interactions among people in society for possible clues to assist them in controlling crime and establishing livable and safe conditions for society as a whole. These are all extremely relevant issues within the police culture as well as in the sociological realm of communities also. These various thoughts are found to be detailed in the current literature being presented to enlighten readers as to how the occupational culture of the police does form symbolic meaning and utilizes the theory of...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Structural Functional Theory & Conflict Theory

...of similarities (Johnson, 2008). According to conflict theory, change is what characterizes society in that there is no specific or followed routine. There are only new developments, not to benefit the community but to separate it more. Conflict theory explains the coming apart of a society. Conflict of class is what conflict theory teaches about. Both functionalism and conflict theory view society as a system that contains social structures, but the difference between them is that for...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

What are the most important differences between functionalism,symbolic interactionlism,and conflict theory

...Perspectives in Sociology Differences between functionalism, symbolic interactionism, and conflict theory Sociologists develop theories to explain phenomena, explaining phenomena from a different perspective and at different levels. To be able to come with the differences between these theories (functionalism, symbolic interactionism and conflict theory) it is important understand their social perspectives. Functionalism...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Symbolic interactionism

...philosophers had not identified them, or none had talked about them openly. For instance, the theory of social penetration applies all the time in the communication process, whether or not the communicators are aware of the existence of the theory. At the same time, in order to socialize and interact in a healthy manner, symbolic interactionism only reflects the reality it claims to symbolize when there is a reduction of uncertainty in the socialization process and pathway. It is through the reduction of uncertainty that people can socialize and share experiences that are foundations for the formation of friendship. In any social perspective, there must...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Differences and Similarities between Christianity and Islam

...Differences and Similarities between Christianity and Islam Comparing Christianity and Islam one can find not only similarities but also differences between these two religions. Despite the fact that the two religions believe in one God, each of them offers a different vision of religious matters. In some aspects, these representations are similar to each other, while in other aspects they differ. To understand the features of these two religions, one needs to consider their attitudes to such five issues as the nature and the main characteristics of God, the role of the great preachers...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Similarities and Differences between Structural Functionalisms, Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interactionism for FREE!

Contact Us