We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Relationship between Armed Conflict and Genocide - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Relationship between Armed Conflict and Genocide Introduction to Genocide and Armed Conflict Raphael Lemkin, the Polish jurist coined the term “genocide” to refer to the massacre of Armenians by Turks during the First World War and the massacre of Jews by Nazis during the Second World War…
Download full paper
Relationship between Armed Conflict and Genocide
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Relationship between Armed Conflict and Genocide

Download file to see previous pages... 21). Genocides have become more frequent over the time and a potential contributing factor to it is the advancement of technology (Kuper, 1983). The Uppsala University (2011) defines armed conflict in these words, “An armed conflict is a contested incompatibility which concerns government and/or territory where the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, results in at least 25 battle-related deaths” (Uppsala University, 2011). In light of this definition of armed conflict, genocide does not qualify as an armed conflict, since one of the two parties is armed in genocide but the second party is a victim. In a conflict, both of the two parties make use of force against each other in one way or another but in the genocide, the force is used by just one party against the other, and the other suffers because of a number of reasons that include but are not limited to the lack of force, lack of technical equipment, lack of skill and training in the use of equipment, and most importantly, lack of political support. “Apart from cases of subaltern genocide, the defenders and deniers of some of history’s worst genocides often justify the killings on the grounds of legitimate defensive or retributory action against traitors and subversives” (Jones, 2011, p. 50). Comparison of Genocide and Armed Conflict The difference between armed conflict and genocide is that in the former, it is at least two states that are fighting with each other whereas in the latter, a state fights with a nation. “Genocidal regimes thrive on the very types of social categories that anthropologists analyze and deploy – peoples, cultures, ethnic groups, nations, religious groups” (Hinton, 2002, p. 18). Thus, when people belonging to a certain community are victimized by another community particularly with the support of the government, the violence classifies as genocide. “Genocide is an extreme method by which a polity eliminates ethnic conflict” (Palmer, 1998). Genocide resembles armed conflict as a campaign and takes place in the context of armed conflict. However, there is a lot of difference between genocide and armed conflict: “Genocide is the antithesis of the ... doctrine (…) [which] holds that war is directed against sovereigns and armies, not against subjects and civilians. In its modern application in civilized society, the doctrine means that war is conducted against states and armed forces and not against populations. It required a long period of evolution in civilized society to mark the way from wars of extermination, which occurred in ancient times and in the Middle Ages, to the conception of wars as being essentially limited to activities against armies and states.” (Lemkin, 2008, p. 80). From this statement, it can be inferred that defining the genocide as a form of violence different from armed conflict relies on the difference between an uncivilized and civilized warfare. Genocide can be distinguished from armed conflict only by understanding the difference between armies and civilians. Relationship between Armed Conflict and Genocide Genocide was initially identified in the war’s context. In the contemporary age, the terms war and armed conflict are used interchangeably. Although the military prefers to refer to it as the “law of armed conflict” ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Protection of human rights and armed conflict
In most of the cases the military action is taken against the established government of a particular state and that is the reason there is a divide between scholars, leaders and general public on the legality and legitimacy of the humanitarian intervention.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Law of Armed conflict. Is it viable in today's world
These aspects about human life and human rights are protected through various laws including The Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC). However, the fact is, motives to indulge in conflict are constantly changing and. due to their nature, the laws which govern armed conflict are not be viable in today’s world.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
NGOs are an effective force in processes of conflict resolution and healing. Discuss using examples
Non-governmental organizations are well known for the provision of humanitarian services in times of disasters or calamities, both natural and man-made. However, their role in conflict resolution and healing has not been recognized until recently by even the United Nations, but following recent events the effectiveness of these organizations in resolving conflict is coming up.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Human rights in armed conflict and the relationship between international criminal law and international use of force, and the r
To this end, the human rights and the territorial rights of the people in these weaker nations were left to the domineering foreign nation. This was the cause of wars in the world and tensions between nations. Thus, after the massive destruction of lives and properties in the Second World War, the United Nations was set up to protect human rights and national/territorial sovereignty of nations.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Rwanda Genocide
This structural analysis leads to an assessment into organizational factors that include the motivating forces of the Rwandan elite, and the opportunity composition within which they were functioning. The actions of important individuals within the Rwandan elite, and the individual behaviour of the subordinates directly instigating the genocide, are studied by drawing on psychological and criminological theories related to identifying such acts.
40 Pages(10000 words)Coursework
Armed Conflict and International Humanitarianism
s and several situations have been averted altogether with the use of diplomacy and economic measures as exemplified by the workings of the European Union. At the same time, there are several places around the world where conflict remains active and humanitarian intervention is
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay
Human rights and armed conflict
l Court of Justice initially stressed on the application of human right laws during armed conflict situation in its 1996 Advisory Opinion on the use of nuclear weapons, and the legitimacy of threats. This paper describes human rights and armed conflict, as the two key
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Perpetrators of the crime of genocide have different intentions on a targeted group based on race, nationality, ethnic group or religion, either because they are rebellious
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
The Relationship Between Gender, Security and Justice in Conflict-Affected Environments
It starts with a brief introduction of the topic, which is then followed by a detailed discussion about gender, security, and justice in conflict-affected environments. A summary of the discussion at the end of paper concludes the topic.
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay
Was ethnicity the cause of the Rwandan genocide
Despite rich natural resources the continent has, Africa has not fully utilised these endowments to achieve economic recognition in
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Relationship between Armed Conflict and Genocide for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us