Evaluates the Current State of Knowledge - Admission/Application Essay Example

Abstract Healthcare reforms have been witnessed in their plurality in the United States history. Various political outfits have been considering these reforms as critical attires of their political fashion. The invoking of critical philosophies that focus on the development of such reforms has been exhaustively engaged by the responsible leaders. Additionally, the various authors have focused on the subject extensively with the reflection of the benefits and negatives that stand to be impacted being critical in their publication. However, the concept of establishing a harmonious platform of knowledge sharing as well as benefit trickling remains evasive in their publications. This proposes an avenue upon which the consideration of such reforms stands to impact onto the wider beneficiaries of their enactment. This paper highlights on such perceptions with the principle role of these reforms being considered in the description of the eventual assumptions and proposals under description. The concept of the plausible knowledge that may be accrued from these reforms remains the guiding principle of engagement. Health care reforms The United System health care system has been engaged with a frequent number of reforms over the ages. This regards to the captions enlisted in the various political agendas, as well as the reflections accredited to the entire Unites States population. The concept of health care remains elemental to the success of the both the lives and the economy harbored in the region. It remains acceptable to concede that healthcare is among the significant items that have engaged a numerous perception of reforms and post amendments. These descriptions elongates from the ages of resident Lyndon who foresaw the introduction of medicare as an item of political and social drive. The most recent reforms have been engaged under the renowned Obamacare policies. It is apparent that healthcare remains at the core of the various political agendas aspired by the leaders in the region. This may lead to the eventual deduction of the perception accredited to this topic. Indeed healthcare reforms have a rich history within the US context. Philosophical concepts and topics The essence of healthcare reforms has a topic of consideration remains anchored along the prospective concept of philosophical interests as well as the perpetual interests accredited to the entire process. Healthcare entices quite a significant number of philosophical concerns. These include the attributes related to the concepts of ethics, responsibility, procedure and attitude proposed towards the engagement with the people. Healthcare considers the restoration of life in a significant number of dilapidated cases. The implication of such attributes is further attributed to the detailing or documentation of the eventual role that is associated to both the practitioners and the recipients of the services in consideration. The rights of both the patients and the practitioners have been engaged in these reforms. The elemental concern while proposing a reform under this subject has been the plight of the involved stakeholders. The perception of having all the involved stakeholders satisfied from the reforms has, mainly, been propelled by the political capital they stand to impact. The patients have been considered the elemental assert in the realization of the aforesaid capital, hence the favoring by a number of such reforms. Illustratively, the philosophy of ethics in these reforms has focused on the manner upon which the patients are treated by both the practitioners and the insurance firms. The plight of the practitioners has, also, been considered under the provision of ethics. However, the central denominator remains accredited to the eventual political mileage that stands to be achieved upon the implementation of the speculated reforms. This may be best elucidated via the Obamacare reforms that stood out as the central topics of trade and marketing in the Democratic Party’s campaigns. The same has been proposed in the rest of the political periods upon which such reforms had been introduced. This assists in the elucidation of the philosophical aspect that are related to this topic. The reforms envisaged under the Health Insurance Profitability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) were also proposed by president Clinton as a campaign ignition item (Cohn and Hough, D2008). The central attribute that remains accredited to this perception comprises of notable sense of the philosophical attributes that are embraced alongside. However, having the concept of such philosophies enticed under the impressions healthcare remains considered a challenge to the upper quarter of the involved stakeholders. The practitioners and the insurance providers remain accredited to the observation of commitment to these philosophies. Contributing knowledge towards decision making The medical practitioners and the insurance providers have been described as the central culprits targeted by the engaged philosophies in healthcare reforms. This perception may be described along the impression of the political agenda in the development of the policies or the concept of professional responsibility. The practitioners remain engaged on the provision of services that described the calling articulated in the professional. This comprises of the nature of treatments they engage to both the patients and the responsible families. The reforms embraced by the healthcare restructurings allow for the provision of convenient platforms of interaction as well as ambient working conditions. Fathoming the details of such subscriptions allow for the integration of a room of convenience in the eventual perception of relation and interaction (Maggie, 2006). However, it remains essential to outline the distinctions that are faced in the description of healthcare. This refers to the articulated interests of commitment and the profitability margins. A significant number of healthcare institutions in the United States are managed under private structures. This implies that the concept of profitability desires to be embraced all along the process of service provision. The wake of diluting from such interest will imply the lack of engaging the business agenda in their activities. Subsequently, the interest of the patients desires to be shielded from the possible aggressiveness that may be engaged alongside the primal interest. This comprises of the interests to have the institution remains at the optimal performance level as well as ensure the straining of the patients is mitigated. The challenge embraced by the national stakeholders in the development and the eventual enactment of the reforms comprise of the respond accorded by the rest of the stakeholders. The patients remains anticipating the provision of convenient and affordable services while practitioners anticipate to have their services being respect. The aforesaid respect comprises of acknowledging on their abilities as a society as well as the provision of plausible remuneration. The insurance providers remains committed to making profits from their services via increasing the inflow of premiums and reducing the outflow from compensations (Reid, 2009). This knowledge assists in the elucidation of the depth upon which the decisions developed by the involved leaders desire to be sourced. The decision made prior to the proposal of a healthcare act remains mainly articulated towards the correction of the unfair practices engaged by the involved stakeholders. The proposal of such amendments in the United States has been accredited either of the stakeholders. This interest has been proposed along the provision of amendments that meets the interest of both players. The striking of a noble sense of balance along the aspire demands describes the procedure undertaken in the healthcare reforms engaged by the country. Additionally, the potential of having each of the players spelt out their demands during the structuring of the reforms has allowed for the observation of transparency and integrity in the entire process (Culp, 2001). Additionally, the elucidation deduced from such ideas remains well anchored under the eventual interest of developing a harmonious working environment. Philosophical assumptions Fathoming the concepts of philosophy in healthcare reforms calls for the consideration of ethics, transparency and consistency towards the realization of the eventual agenda. It remains apparent that the eventual role of these virtues in the description of the eventual professional in healthcare remains the elemental source of fortified professional capacity. Apparently, considering an input of both the reform developer and the eventual implementation targets, the context upon which such engagements sought to be addressed class for the inclusion of the entire fraternity of experts. The leaders are, thus, enshrined with the generation of a decision that allows for the consideration of the contributions that targets the entire population of stakeholders (Leap, 2011). The development of the Obamacare remains among the policies that embraced these schools of philosophy prior to the eventual engagement. The eventual impact of each of the proposals was considered along the understanding presented by the involved stakeholders. Additionally, the possibility of engaging on an angle that may spell a prospective conflict of interest was ironed out via the invitation of neutral decisions from the available resources. This impression calls for the consideration of the various practices accorded to this topic. Healthcare stands to benefit from a significant number of contributory factors in regard to the magnitude of the participating stakeholders. This understanding considers the prospect of enticing operative paradigms that remain articulated in the entire practice. A significant of such inputs relates to the depth that are to be considered by the adopted philosophies, with the input of information dispensation being regarded as ultimate to the line of discourse. Among the notable operative paradigms under evaluation involves the role of the practitioners in the delivery of accurate and consistent information to the patients (Edmund, 2008). The same is anticipated to be considered by the insurance providers. The novel paradigms of healthcare philosophy consider the role of information dispersion critical to the eventual success in Medicare dispensation. Additionally, the context of information dispensation remains grossly accredited to the eventual interaction considered in the development of the eventual amendments. Apparently, it has been argued that the principle philosophy that guides the consideration of such amendments rests on the eventual capacity of establishing a harmonious platform of interaction. This perception assists in the elucidation of the contributive window that engages the three philosophies. However, the definition of healthcare as a subject has engaged a considerable input of scientific perceptions and ideologies. This is in regards to the impression of the adjustments considered in the entire industry as well as the Medicare fraternity (Delanty and Strydom, 2003). The of novel policies under amendments desires to embrace such changes in a manner that depicts some sense of respect to the career in its entirety. The inclusions of provisions that allow for the aforementioned insertion remain critical to the eventual role of the policies in the growth of the subject. However, there exists a number of contributive stakeholders that stand to impact positively on the growth of the entire industry. These include the hospital arrangements on the insurance policies, as well as the eventual concept of cost being central to the fathoming of healthcare as a subject. The elemental role of such attributes is oriented on the eventual merits it stands to impact to the parties involved in the implementation of a healthcare policy. The Obamacare allowed such windows in its amendments description. This accommodated the future demands that stood to be engaged under the Medicare world. Literature gaps The concept of healthcare reforms and the philosophical angle considered in their implementation in the American society has been reflected grossly in the American Population. This points on the perpetual capacity upon which the topic has been addressed in the various pieces of literatures. The involved authors have proposed a significant set of items upon which the concept of the noted reforms may be examined. Scholarly, the topics of relevance to both the medicare society, and economy at large have been reflected (Christensen and Jason, 2009). However, the impression of the current trends engaged in the two angles and their representation in these knowledge have not been considered. The descriptions of professionalism as an attribute of these amendments have won the concerns of the scholarly literatures focusing on the subject. This implies that there exists a significant perspective to be established along the concept of both the healthcare reforms and their engaged philosophies. The entire perception of rhetoric deduction accredited to the reasoning of relevance and validation of such reforms stand to be considered distant from the scholarly (Edmund, 2008) impression that may annexed to this subject. Apparently, concerns such as the role of such reforms in the shaping of the contemporary medical classes has been shielded from inclusion in the aforementioned literatures. This is irrespective of the substantial role that stands to be impacted from the engagement of the reforms with the scholarly interests. Practitioner-wisely, the availed literatures have focused on elemental aspect of the reforms in the shaping of the industry. This has been achieved via the reflection of the engaged reforms in the shaping of the involved professionals (Shaw, 2010). The practitioners of both medicine and the insurance services have won the reflection by the various authors over their contributions. This assists in the consideration of their input in the industry. It is thus critical to point on the contribution they stand to impact on such reforms in the later future. The various publications under reflection paint the concepts presented as an outcome respond. This points on the elevating desire of considering the input they stand to impact in reform generation as an ideal publication gap for consideration. Regarding leadership, the concept of motive and ethical perception related to the development of the eventual policies considered under healthcare reforms. The prospect of having a political drive force in the eventual consideration of such policies has been reflected on the various literatures. The reflection of their relevance in the promotion of a harmonious interaction between the practitioners and the purposive leaders remains out of consideration in these literatures. This proposes the prospect of examining such perceptions along the entire process of reforms and interlink between the involved stakeholders (Saini and Shlonsky, 2012). Evaluation of the assumptions These assumptions remain critical in the definition of the prospective growths that may be registered in the entire concept of healthcare reforms in the United States. Apparently, the magnitude of their engagement remains considered along the potential benefits they stand to add to the wider parties. As reflected in the SPL model, the benefits that may be accrued from such reforms stands to trickle further upon the consideration of the role of they stand to offer. The merits accredited to the process of making such assumptions and the eventual path of proposals that come alongside remains mainly accredited to the entire system of practices and behaviors embraced under healthcare reforms. Concerns such as philosophical ethics have been reflected in these reforms. However, the impact they stand to impact to the scholars world. As well as the leadership are rarely considered. This undermines the essence they offer to the perpetual researchers as well as the parties considered in the development and enactment of these adjustments. However the role of the reforms in the shaping of the Medicare world has had direct impacts on each of the primal targets. The HIPAA considered the prospective of reduced healthcare cost towards the redefinition of the services in the country (Arbuckle, 2013). It may be argued that the eventual scholarly ambitions aspired upon the implementation of such a reform comprised of practices that may reduce the eventual cost of medical services. This remains perceived as essential in the redefinition of the future practitioners. Subsequently, the same these are considered in the description of the paradigm of trends embraced by the practitioners. Conclusion Upon reflection, the American healthcare reforms have been numerous. Their development may be considered to have been achieved upon the considerations of a detailed philosophical background that has advised the involved developers. However, the eventual harmonization of such reforms to the entire fraternity of parties that stand to register benefits from these practices remains widely out of consideration. Additionally, the concept relevance and future demands that surface from the engagement with the involved practitioners remains rather elusive from being achieved via the observed reforms. It remains apparent that the reflections considered by the various literatures may have left credible gaps that may propel the noted reforms into a harmonious interaction piece. This challenges the role of such literatures in the description of the potential that stands to be fetched from these reforms via a different perception. The contribution of the entire partisans and the persons sharing similar interests has been articulated as a notable literature gap that desires to be addressed. References Arbuckle, G. A. (2013). Humanizing healthcare reforms. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Christensen, C. H. & Jason, G. J. (2009). The innovator's prescription. USA: McGraw Hill. Cohn, K. H, & Hough, D. E. (2008). The business of healthcare. Westport, Conn: Praeger. Culp, C. L. (2001). The risk management process: Business strategy and tactics. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Delanty, G., & Strydom, P. (Eds.). (2003). Philosophies of social science: The classic and contemporary readings. Philadelphia. PA: McGraw-Hill. Edmund, D. P. (2008). The philosophy of medicine reborn. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Leap, T. L. (2011). Phantom billing, fake prescriptions, and the high cost of medicine: health care fraud and what to do about it. New York: Cornell University Press. Maggie, M. (2006). Money-driven medicine: The real reason health care: Costs so much. UK: HarperCollins. Reid, T.R. (2009). The healing of America: A global quest for better, cheaper and fairer health Care. USA: Penguin Books. Saini, M., &Shlonsky, A. (2012). Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press. Shaw, G. M. (2010). The healthcare debate. Santa Barbara, Calif: Greenwood. Read More