Social Influences on Behavior - Essay Example

Social Influences on Behavior Paper Human beings are social creatures who normally desire communication with other human beings. There are numerous reasons why people need social interaction such as companionship, gain perspective and sharing ideas. Human beings are compared to chameleon since they strive to fit best in the prevailing environment. No individual wish to be irrelevant thus people tend to either acclimatize or alter their prevailing behavior in order to suit the situations (Kirst-Ashman, 2008). Individuals are normally discouraged from being part of crowd since it makes it cumbersome for others to know the real individual character. Prevailing human behaviors always alters in order to suit the underlying social condition. The main influential behaviors of individual entail peer pressure and attitude. Peer pressure commonly found in teen or high school students are the main ways in which groups are normally influenced. Moreover, peers play a greater role in the day to day life of a teenager, more than that teen’s own family (Forte, 2007). As the teen becomes an independent person, they may tend to break away from the family structure, making her to influence other friends and peers. Peer pressure comes into effect when other peers attempt to influence one another in social situations (Kirst-Ashman, 2008). This behavior can be positive as it can push the teens into new experiences that mainly occur by joining academic clubs or sports in school. Nevertheless, numerous teen succumb into negative peer pressures by involving in drug abuse, risky sexual behaviors and criminal actions. Male individuals who hung out with other male friends normally handle themselves differently from the way they behave when in other corresponding situation. Male individual who is always good-mannered and humble when away with other male friends might decide to be naughty and behave indifferently on a weekend out with other guys (Charles & Kirst-Ashman, 2010). He may end up welcoming the women counterpart through gazing and whistling when in the group of testosterone fuelled males. Men strolling with other male friends may try to outdo via applying all available means. In any case they were talking about the cars the underlying conversation may turn into who has a car with bigger tires or who receives better gas distance. In case they are in different place such as a pub it may change into a hot contest in order to depict the person who drink more alcohol or talk to more women. In this situation might change to be louder and reckless in regard to the individuals. Nevertheless, they cannot behave this way when their wives are around but if the wives are away, they will play. This change of behavior is normally due desire to fit in the company and reward their underlying peers. The reward is normally in the form of making pleasing and cheering each other if one of them approach a woman and ask for phone contact. The underlying individual might resort to cheering one another when they are competing to see who finishes beer first. Men lean match to one another standards of tolerable male conduct among each other (Forte, 2007). Nonetheless, in the presence of different personalities other than the group they tend to abstain from undertaking such acts. This depicts that social interaction influences behavior of an individual massively in one way or the other. For instance, students are normally noisy in night clubs when are not in company of family members but quiet when with family members. This may be due to the effort to match his peers (Kirst-Ashman, 2008). Putting on a wide tie when thin is in fashion normally makes numerous male counterpart insecure since wearing a wrong brand tennis shoes for many teenagers. Under this situation an individual is rewarded for owning up for the actions of the male friend thus safeguarding them from being disliked and being taunted from best friends for being boring. Individual’s behavior might also be influenced by the things and action they see and undertake. For instance, in Halloween numerous people normally found it fun and attractive when they go together to a ghost tour. Ghosts hunt normally an individual behavior alters within the underlying social condition (Jose, LeCroy & Lortie, 2010). Everything that a person hears along the suggestion power can cause one to encounter supernatural situations. An individual within the ghost hunt may abruptly sense a cold experience or rather experience a shadow that may not be really present (Ashford, 2010). When this person starts telling other group members what he is experiencing, the other members may commence to sense and perceive things (Charles & Kirst-Ashman, 2010). The other members may think that they are seeing or experiencing the same thing so not to leave out individual who is not undergoing whatsoever may go along with what others are saying only to realize that the affected individual encounter genuine ghost. Numerous people in regard to the belief of the ghost hunting that they will encounter in having a telepathic experience. This normally occurs since the underlying experiences in regard to the tour guide are capable of telling the past history of the group (Levy, 2005). Even if they don experience the actual ghost thus going home strictly believing and saying that they experience the ghost (Forte, 2007). The power of implicit and explicit prospect of this sort gives the fundamental basis pertaining for self-fulfilling, divinations, which imitate untrue situation induce a behavior that makes individual feeling become true. People within the underlying cemetery could be seen to be pointing at the darkest corner in a persuasive tone. This can cause other members to commence pointing at the corner by claiming that they are also view at the ghost (Jose, LeCroy & Lortie, 2010). In a normal environment an individual would not normally walk around with his hands trying to feel cold experience within the steady state of anxiety that depicts the prevailing case of individuals in regard to ghost hunt (Charles & Kirst-Ashman, 2010). This eliminates the need for involvement of healing in the dual examples. The underlying experiences are unreliable in the two examples and thus do not slow down the underlying standard behavior outdoor the sole situations. It is explained in example one that men are typically respectful when situation needs and are lesser maintained in presence of friends. This is ordinary conduct for both men (Charles & Kirst-Ashman, 2010). The situation may call for therapeutic involvement in case the individual within the case is behaving in a bad way within a bar within a place of work. As explained earlier in the second situation, ghost people do not continue with the same behavior when they are out of the tour. There is dare need for intervention in case the underlying individuals encountering effect of ghost hunt continued on daily basis. These two examples confirmed that the people can change their behavior to suit the underlying circumstance. There are numerous reasons as to people match to the whole attitude of the prevailing group. This mainly revolves around the similar reasons individuals require companionship of other existing individuals (Jose, LeCroy & Lortie, 2010). Whether it is because of the frightening experience in regard to Halloween, night on town, people normally enjoy being together with each other. References Kirst-Ashman, K. K. (2008). Human behavior, communities, organizations, and groups in the macro social environment. Belmont, Calif: Thomson/Brooks/Cole. Top of Form Forte, J. A. (2007). Human Behavior and the social environment: Models, metaphors, and maps for applying theoretical perspectives to practice. Belmont, CA: Thomson. Bottom of Form Charles, Z & Kirst-Ashman,K.(2010). Understanding Human Behavior and the Social Environment. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning, Top of Form Jose,A LeCroy, C & Lortie, K.(2010). Human Behavior in the Social Environment: A Multidimensional Perspective. Australia: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, Bottom of Form Top of Form Read More