Netanyahu Speech on the Nuclear Deal - Movie Review Example

Netanyahu’s speech in Congress on the nuclear deal Introduction People express varying opinions towards the real issues affecting the society. The Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave a very controversial speech in the attempts of appealing to president Obama to withdraw talks with Iran. He warned that this is a bad deal whose works can pave the Iran’s path to bombs which can easily give rise to a possible nuclear nightmare. This impassioned case was in US congress, Washington D.C in an address that was highly anticipated. The United States congress can be defined as the federal government’s bicameral legislature. It consists of two houses the House of Representatives and the senate. The congress meets in capitol which is located in Washington D.C. Benjamin claimed that this deal would create two chief concessions which act as a threat to Israel’s security as well as the region. This will be through retention of Iran’s ability to initiate a nuclear weapons program.1 Netanyahu termed it as a bad deal and explained that Israel is much better without the deal. The speech welcomed mixed views and responses from people of all the walks of life as the document analyzes.1 Discussion The speech encompassed strong views against the American Iranian negotiations that are underway. This speech stirred up some political controversy of the two countries. He noted that these negotiations will just guarantee that Tehran gets the nuclear weapons to harm the entire world. Netanyahu also noted that from the previous attempts, it is evident that Iran is a nation that cannot be trusted. This is irrespective of whatever they say in terms of whichever accord designed to stop it from acquiring those weapons. He also noted in the speech that the world is now facing the danger of the Islamic militant marriage with the nuclear weapons. The members of the house expressed varying opinions concerning these Netanyahu’s words. A loud applause was received. However the applause came from the republicans while the democrats revealed a restrained reaction. According to Netanyahu, after the deal will be done Iran was to receive two major concessions. One concession was to leave intact the Iran’s vast nuclear infrastructure. The other concession was to lift the restrictions on this program in like a decade. According to Netanyahu, the world should make sure that no restrictions get lifted on the nuclear program on Iran (New York Times 2). This will be until Iran stops all the aggressive activities against its neighbors in Mideast, seize supporting terrorism in the globe and refrain from annihilating Israel.2 Netanyahu in his speech singled out the world-renowned author Elie Wiesel who was also a holocaust survivor. This was in reference to the Nazis who put to death approximately 6 million Jews. He noted that the days of watching their genocidal enemies manipulating them while they are passive are long gone. “The days when the Jewish people remained passive in the face of genocidal enemies are over,” Netanyahu said. He vowed that it doesn’t matter whether Israel will stand alone in this battle. He, however, came up quickly to add that the Americans have always stood with the Israelites. The members of the house seemed divided in the reception of Netanyahu’s words. The republicans highly applauded Netanyahu’s speech while the democrats revealed their discontent in Netanyahu’s speech 3. The Netanyahu’s remarks were greeted by a very loud applause from the American lawmakers although not everybody got persuaded by his rhetoric. Nancy Pelosi the house democratic leader of California refrained applauding in several occasions.3 When Netanyahu called for holding out for a more appealing deal with Iran, Nancy held her hands and in disagreement shook her head.4 Various views from different people of different fields have been expressed. At times Netanyahu received raucous applause when issuing his speech. However, his message received reactions from every corner of the world. Iran and Israel led in reacting towards his speech. This was because in these two nations emotions ran high. The reactions were both in support as well as opposition of this message. Netanyahu’s remarks that these talks would just guarantee that Iran acquires nuclear weapons in large quantity were strongly condemned especially by the Iranians. Netanyahu portrayed Iran as bloodthirsty and untrustworthy with intentions of annihilating Israel and threatening Israel’s allies. The Iranians pounced quickly against these remarks condemning Netanyahu and claiming that he is just a liar. The television banners labeled Netanyahu’s speech as an example of Iranaphobia. Other journalists claimed that the speech humiliated the American president and also tended to deepen the wedge between Israel and its allies of longtime. The Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson said that the speech was a symbol of weakness and isolation of the radical groups. She termed it as a deceitful theater play. She also said that Netanyahu was lying that the intentions and aims of the peaceful nuclear program of Iran have been in existence and they have been consistently sickening.5 Isaac Herzog, who is Israel’s labor party chairman, on the other hand, termed Netanyahu’s speech as impressive as it did not stop the Iranian’s nuclear program. It did not also impact the talks that were ongoing in Switzerland. He, however, noted that the accomplishment of the speech was a great undermine of the relationship between USA and Israel. He added that Netanyahu’s speech would not change the Obama’s administration. It would just broaden the crisis of Israel’s great friend and a strategic ally. He termed it as a price that Israel will be forced to pay. 5 Among the individuals who stood to support Netanyahu’s speech is Danny Danon, the former Israel’s deputy defense minister. Danon claimed that Netanyahu sounded the alarm for Israel’s survival (New York Times 6). He noted that they are worried of their safety. He noted that he is very proud of their prime minister since he expressed the exact feeling they are experiencing. He also claimed the deal is a bad one. The white house also expressed displeasure with the appearance of Netanyahu by both words and deed. American vice president Joe Biden noted that Netanyahu did not fill his customary seat which is located behind the house rostrum during the speech. He also failed to meet with the American president during his trip in USA. 6 The Obama’s administration has complained that the congressional republicans inserted a destructive partisanship into the American-Israel alliance through Netanyahu’s invitation to give a speech although they played down this controversy in several hours prior to the address. Valerie Jarrett termed the speech a sort of distraction but said that it will not undermine the commitment of Obama to Israel. Jarrett noted that America and Israel share a common goal in enhancing Iran seizes from developing the nuclear weapons. He, however, said that he is differing with Netanyahu over the tactics he is proposing for achieving this goal.7 The Iranian media outlets seem to view this issue from a different perspective. Most of the Iran’s media houses have covered the controversy surrounding the speech as well as its disapproval by the white house. They also pointed out that some senators would fail to attend the Netanyahu’s speech as a sign of protest. The Iranian newspapers, for example hard-line Kayhan expressed a belief that Obama and Netanyahu are deceiving the Iranian negotiators. Hard-line Kayhan is the chosen editor by the supreme leader of Iran. He has stood firm in opposing the nuclear deal between the UN Security Council and Iran and views the speech of Netanyahu and the entire controversy as a ploy 7of getting Iran sign the bad deal.8 Kayhan’s top story in the newspaper was headlined as Netanyahu’s mission of supporting the Geneva agreement under opposition guise. He noted that America and Israel had engaged in jeweler’s war which is defined in Persian as when two sides tends to work together in faking a conflict so as to force the nuclear negotiators of Iran make a calculation that is incorrect in the nuclear talks. Kayhan claimed the entire controversy as a political maneuvering which will give America a golden opportunity of forcing Iran into more concessions and Netanyahu’s opposition intended to deceive the Iranian team. It is clear from the discussion that people received Netanyahu’s speech with different perceptions. Some agreed with such as Danny and some American republicans while others disagreed with him completely. Some Iranians on the other hand termed this as hypocrisy. 9 Conclusion Netanyahu’s speech offered a real controversy. The agenda behind this speech is hard to be determined. I believe holding the negotiations is the best way of solving this whole issue. Using force in finding the solution might only complicate the situation. I think it will be better for the American and Israel leaders to give room for negotiations. However, the negotiations should be done with a great level of transparency. 8 Hypocrisy should not feature anywhere in the negotiation process. Iran, on the other hand, should seize from dealing with nuclear weapons. In conclusion, negotiations need to be given the first priority. The negotiation process is not worthy being termed as a bad deal when it has not been given time to see what it can bring on table. War should be the last option in this whole issue after every other way has failed.10 Bibliography Aron, Heller & Deb, Riechman. 2015. Iran nuclear deal ‘paves the way to the bomb,’ Netanyahu says in fiery speech to U.S. Congress. Retrieved From: http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/03/03/benjamin-netanyahu-speech-live-video/ Burgess, Everett. 2015. Graham congratulates Netanyahu, assures on congressional review of Iran deal. Retrieved From: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/graham-netanyahu-congressional-review-iran-deal-116282.html Dan, Williams & Matt, Spetalnick. 2015. Israels Netanyahu draws rebuke from Obama over Iran speech to Congress. Retrieved From: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/04/us-usa-israel-idUSKBN0LZ0BS20150304 Dan Roberts, Peter Beaumont & Saeed Kamali. 2015. Iran nuclear deal will be a farewell to arms control, Netanyahu tells Congress. Retrieved From: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/netanyuahu-congress-iran-nuclear-deal-path-to-bomb Dimi, Reider. 2015. Why Netanyahu May Accept an Iran Deal. Retrieved From: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/03/netanyahu-iran-deal-116364.html#.VRWppfnF_oE Greg, Botelho & Kate, Bolduan. 2015. Condemnation in Iran, critiques and praise in Israel after Netanyahu talk. Retrieved From: http://edition.cnn.com/2015/03/03/world/israel-netanyahu-speech-reaction/ Itamar, Sharon & Marissa, Newman. 2015. In blistering speech, PM warns ‘bad’ deal ‘paves path’ to Iranian nukes - Netanyahu evokes upcoming holiday of Purim in accusing Tehran of seeking to annihilate the Jewish people; Congress responds with enthusiastic applause. Retrieved From: http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-warns-of-iranian-nuclear-deal-in-congress-speech/ Krishnadev, Calamur. 2015. In Speech To Congress, Netanyahu Blasts A Very Bad Deal With Iran. Retrieved From: http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2015/03/03/390250986/netanyahu-to-outline-iran-threats-in-much-anticipated-speech-to-congress New York Times. 2015. Benjamin Netanyahu Speech to Congress 2015. Retrieved From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRf1cdw4IAY Peter, Baker. 2015. In Congress, Netanyahu Faults ‘Bad Deal’ on Iran Nuclear Program. Retrieved From: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/04/world/middleeast/netanyahu-congress-iran-israel-speech.html?_r=0 Ted, Regencia. 2015.  Netanyahus US speech a blessing for Iran talks? Retrieved From: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2015/02/netanyahu-speech-blessing-iran-talks-150227134248117.html Read More