Theoretical Validity of Alexander Wendts Belief That a World State Is Inevitable - Essay Example

Theoretical Validity of Alexander Wendt’s Belief That a World Is Inevitable Theoretical Validity of Alexander Wendt’sBelief That a World State Is Inevitable Introduction The world is evolving, and basic structure that constitutes a given state are adjusting and accommodating different ideas. The nature at which these institutions are adapting to the environment indicates the agency in which states are gearing towards a common platform. The historical composition of an institution where based on smaller united of society with each person identifying himself with these units. The dependency nature of humans has pushed many states to adopt models that ensure internal satisfaction by depending on other external factors. The trend indicates the nature in which the progressive evolution is essential towards a unified nature of the operation by states. The main concern among many would be how a unified state would be possible. Different states varies in terms of economy and cultural aspects. Thus, there is a need to identify key factors that will enhance the formation of a unified state (Lebow, 2008). A one state concept is inevitable as the world is gearing towards common concepts. The essay will focus upon factors the inevitable nature of a one state future of the world with respect to common occurrences within societies. Coexistence among society represents the human ability to adapt foreign concepts and at the same time utilize them to satisfy their needs. Factors that satisfy these needs may be available in the immediate environment or could be sourced from different locations. The depleting resources would mean that various regions depend on each other for mutual benefits. Those with scarce resources will depend on other regions and in return offer other services and the monetary equivalent to the other state (Tatum, 2012). Wendt (2003) attributes this concept to the humans ability to become collective thinkers. This allows states to negotiate and collaborate with other sectors to satisfy needs. He attributes the collective thinking to the evolution concepts that humans have developed over time. The key to this success is when each state identifies their positions in the world and combines efforts with another state to create a society where each aspect of society is at equilibrium. The theory indicates how countries create common goals as the as the millennium goals set by the international community. The move is aimed at bringing the world at par hence enhancing the notion of a unified state. The economic independence among states could justify the Wendts argument of future unified states. The overreliance nature of states would push states in creating a common economic forum that would allow states to trade freely and minimize barriers within states (Keohane, 2000). The European Unions is an example of would initiatives in creating a suitable economic environment for both its citizens and other economic players within the society. The EU acts as a cornerstone in which overtime the world would create a similar concept to minimize the impact of the global unfairness in the world (Foreman, 2005).The logic behind the formation is the need for an effective and functional unit to oversee economic activities within the state (Guzzini & Leander,. 2006). The social unity with the economic world creates an argue for a global society to develop a single unit of power to control the complex nature of trade and other economic activities within the region. The common visa, the single currency and free trade within Europe reflect the positive nature of unity among states. Wendt (2003) argues on the concept of anarchy. He relates it the realism theory. This in mind, countries need to identify key differences within the world. This includes the political and economic differences. the3 situation may be unbearable when two powerful nations engage in never ending conflicts. The effect of war could be devastating (Kazmi, 2012).This was the case of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing by the United States. The aftermath of the war means that the country would live to rebuilt and heal wounds among the victims. The psychological and psychical damages within the country prompted the two countries to rethink on their policies and relations. The impact of the war will mean those countries that are engaged in conflict work on formalities in an effort of averting heavy damages. This perceptive gives hope for those countries engaged in political conflicts and over time the cost of war will be unbearable and peace would be a solution (Weber, 2014). This indicates how ancient differences within the state will be outdated, and countries will exist based on mutual respect. The argument of how to safeguard basic interest while minimizing cost would be a factor to consider while validating Wendts argument. Countries will engage in a bilateral agreement in an effort of reducing the cost burdens within a state (Bohman, 2004). This implies that countries will combine politically and economically to reduce the cost used while operating and executing various concepts. An example of this concept is the NATO forces, the AU missions within states and the EU economic forums. The cost of combating threats within a country may be large, but combine force between local and other organs would ensure systems run effectively. The argument of unity among state could be a solution to costly operation within countries. The viability of Wendt argument is evident on how different countries and continents unite to create a stronger force to conquer any challenge faced by a single state (Buzan et al. 1994). A single country would seem weaker thus need to create a unified state that will enhance the nature in which people interact. The essence of a unified state is to enable people to access resources easily and enjoy equal security. Thus, each unit will ensure that they align themselves to a certain number of morals and activities. The world would create a platform where each will assess these resources. Elements of resistance will emerge once a given part feels oppressed by current matters (Slaughter, 2004). The threat with could be minimised once stringent measures are kept in place this mean that force would be used to ensure a certain standard is maintained. Wendt (2003) relates this concept to the logic of force. Those resisting major policies will be a force to abide by the rules. This concept is visible by the nature in which the core states are forcing other states to follow certain standards (Herborth,2011). An example is the fight between the west and the ISIL movement in the Middle East. A battle for military supremacy will force those weak to abide by the laws of the elite countries. The concept will mean that resisting nations will be forced into uniting with another state for the good of their survival. Wendt (2003) indicates how nations are transforming the nature in which they perceive sovereignty and identity. This means that identity has moved from political and social identity to corporate identity. The concept is relatively similar to the human nature of the organisation, which is based on individual needs and social responsibilities (Buzan et al. 1994). States then are using this concept top redefine their positions in the global scenes. Each nation in the European Union is mandated to ensure their region is safe. These countries organise themselves based on the concept of corporate sovereignty. The idea could be replicated to other nation in that when nations identify their values in society and differentiate important concepts, they will embark on efforts to align themselves on common global factors. These concepts could be either economic or technological in the sense that people will identify themselves based on a common element rather than personal interests. A unified state inevitability however has been criticised by different concepts within society. The imaginable nature of the political world without tyranny and war among elite nation is what may prevent a one state concept (Craig, 2008). The social and economic gap between the core state and peripheral state indicate the longer period in which the world could realise the dream of a unified state. The current political temperatures within state and ever-growing military action prevent the force concept of Wendt in ensuring unity (Guzzini & Leander,. 2006). Each country has unique political system. Thus, they possess different characteristics that deter them from uniting with other nationals. The final concept within the realisation of the concept is the idea of reliability in that the world creates difference within state and that stable state would depend on less of the peripheral states (Pierson, 2000) In conclusion, the theory of a unified state is attainable in the end. This implies that the world would develop models that will ensure they attain equilibrium and bridge the gap between nations. These include creating a common economic platform where states will achieve basic needs and satisfy needs based on the local demand. The political scene would mean that nations bury their political differences and work on common agendas to ensure they attain certain goals. Those objected to the global idea would be forced by circumstances or dealt with by other states. The world unified state scenario would be achievable only if major differences within states are worked resolved. The concept could otherwise be just, but a dream in that Wendt could only state his argument as a theory rather than a reality. The argument would mean a progressive revolution of the world and its creature to adapt to a similar concept. Reference Kazmi, Z.2012. Polite Anarchy in International Relations Theory. New Delhi: Palgrave Macmillian Craig, C .2008.The Resurgent Idea of World Government. Ethics & International Affairs, 22.(2), pp. 2-7 Wendt, A .2003. Why a World State Is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations, 9 (4), pp. 491-542. Bohman, J. 2004.Republican Cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (3), pp 336–352. Slaughter, A. 2004.A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Buzan, B., Little., R .& Jones., C.. 1994. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism and Structural Realism, The American Political Science Review 8 (1), pp. 249-251 Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2), pp. 251-267. Tatum, D.2012. The paradox of path dependence: The problem of Teleology in international theory. E- international relation. [online]. Available at: < http://www.e-ir.info/2012/07/16/the-paradox-of-path-dependence-the-problem-of-teleology-in-international-theory/> [Accessed 11 December 2014] Herborth , B.2011 Challenging Anarchy: Pragmatist Perspectives on the Agent-Structure problem in the theory of Alexander Wendt. International House. [online]. Available at [Accessed 11 December 2014] Foreman, A. 2005.Social Theory, Europe and Politics: European Integration and the Transformation of the State in Alexander Wendt’s. Social Theory of International Politics, 2, pp11- 24 Guzzini, S. & Leander, A. 2006. Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics. New York: Routledge Weber, M. 2014. Between ‘issues’ and ‘ought’: IR constructivism, Critical Theory, and the challenge of political philosophy. European Journal of International Relations 20( 2), pp 516-543 Lebow, R.N.2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press. Keohane, R. 2000. The idea part way down. Review of international Studies, 16, pp. 125- 130 Read More