Utilization of Social Media in Arab Uprisings - Essay Example

Utilization of Social Media in Arab Uprisings Introduction The world’s leadership has revolutionized across all the states dimensions and this has had an impact on how the countries affairs are governed. The main reason as to why numerous of rebellious have turned against the administration of their countries is due to bad systems of command. It is in accordance with this reason that facilitated a lot of citizens from the Arabian countries to demonstrate against their governments which they felt was misusing their freedom and rights. The first nation in the Middle Eastern region to rebel was Tunisia and proliferated, leading to homogenous uprisings later, in Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Bahrain, and Syria. Both Tunisia and Egypt were revolutionized simultaneously because they were dividing sophisticated techniques of technologies in strengthening their results of rebellion. The civilians of these countries wanted to end and preempt numerous years of humiliation, bribery and exploitation. The crowded citizens in the streets did not gather to promote their political views or suggestions, but their main objective was to riot against social economic conditions; such as high cost of living and unemployment. The beliefs of citizens transformed due to their political involvements and this made both the juveniles and elderly to discover themselves both as patriots and rebels. Communication technologies were highly useful and this made a lot of people able to reach their groups in effective time. This essay encompasses all the supportive materials to explain the rebellion of Arabs, covers in details some of the techniques which were utilized in success of their uprising and also conclusions. 1.0 Utilization of Social Media in Arab Uprisings Social networks were useful and played significant informational and organizational duties. The social platform such as Facebook facilitated the removal of Tunisia’s Ben Ali and Egypt’s Mubarak to digital platform. Assertions for example ‘‘This is Facebook Uprising” were regular in major lanes and cities, whereas root problems of corruption and exploitation of human rights in most of the Arab nations was a menace. Media of interactions such as Facebook, YouTube, and mobile phones were in plenty and were mainly used by a number of literate persons. Many of the Protestants in streets and cities lost their lives but the revolution groups prevailed persistence with their technological plans. Groups of networks generated friends, families and members of other networks. This material transfers reached the mainstream channels and satellite medias, some of whom including Al-Jazeera, acted in a significant duty in redistributing the content to the numerous of Tunisian citizens who had no Internet. The utilization of technological advancements by the people of Tunisia and Egypt for their revolution went viral and this made the government to find methods in curbing the situation. The government through the Tunisia communication agency facilitated in the blocking of all Facebook pages, preventing the transfer of videos and images and hacking the websites of external media that was supporting the revolution. However, this did not have a substantial effect to revolts because a new medium known as Anonymous and Hactivism assisted them in attack of government websites and also provided fax bridges in enabling dispersion of information. 2.0 Causes that facilitated Arab Uprisings The motion of social riot which was dominated through the Arab world during 2011, added some long-awaited administrations and seriously destroying others, was the result of decades of exploitation and bad systems of governance, unstructured economic rules and socially abandoned and dissatisfied populations, especially youths. The Economic Grounds of the disruption. The simultaneous three decades of the unsuccessful economic periods in Tunisia and Egypt facilitated the International Money Transfer and the World Bank to initiate strict policies. This affected sky-rocketing of various products and eventually degraded the living standards of people. For this reason, citizens wanted forceful transformations because the central leaders had rejected their plight. The protests were facilitated by extreme grievances of political, economic and social injustices which were conducted by leaders; this made a lot of unemployment to rise at gross margins. Poverty also rose due to unavailability of job opportunities and this facilitated poor standards of living. Many people had been abused, tortured, humiliated and others exploited in fight of their conjugal freedom and rights. There was a public consensus among observers as to the long-term causes of the Arab uprising rebellion. The protests in their sense were not ethical, in such they did not seem to follow any ideological orders and plans. Instead, they joined resentful citizens from across diplomatic, economic, level and religious separation but common persons who had endured at the responsibility of the dictatorial systems. In Tunisia, this feature was brought by Mohammed Bouazizi, a lane trader who was frustrated by police coercion and embarrassment (Salih para 2). The vendor burned himself and later died due to injuries and pain. In Egypt, desire for revolution was supported by an organization known as ‘we are all Khaled said’; this was devoted to juveniles Egyptians who had died in doubtful situations on police station in June 2010. The social media platforms were also a vital factor for the Arab revolution. It facilitated the rebellion groups to conduct their mandates in a more judicious manner using the appropriate skills. The revolts were able to communicate and organized their groups and also it gave them the ability and techniques in acquiring all the governments’ details thus they were able to fulfill their stated objectives. The geographical location in numerous of Arab countries has a positive impact in their international cause for uprising. Egypt is regarded as the biggest country in Arab and the first to sign the political stability agreement between it and Israel. Due to the presidency of Egypt, it became the integral joint of Israel and also Israel’s core distributor of energy. Egypt also confirmed Israel’s of their political stability and security. Egyptians have never accepted the peace treaty between its country and Israel and as a result of abruptly removal of Hosni Mubarak, suggestions have been made to end the treaties. The decline of the stability process between Palestinian and Israel and the Lebanese conquest over Israel, facilitated numerous reasons and bravery to the Egyptians and Tunisian to protest against their government (Jamoul Para 1). Rallying call of the Mosque gave a brilliant platform for the demonstrators as the best protests were held on Fridays when Muslim adherent headed for their usual prayers and preaching. Although the demonstrations were not religiously motivated, the Mosques were the most vital commencing points for general meetings. The sovereignty were targeting main squares and universities, but were not able to close down religious places such as Mosques. This made Protestants to plan their strategies and tactics in efficient time and with null disturbances. Political dissatisfactions as strength for demonstrating. The Arab demographic, across the Mashrek and the Maghreb regions were passionate in developing strong and sustainable political structures that could reference their histories and focused their goals. The twenty-two Arab countries display difficult and exceptional differences due to the beginning of such entities. Following world war 1and 2, their social needs and alternatives they had made during the cold war. The Arabs were moved to uprising because the process of power transfer was inevitable and did not allow democracy to be practiced by all the citizens. However, the system of sovereignty was only allowing the ruling dynasties, Military and wealthy parties. Democracy had ceased to exist as the average ruling term for leaders was twenty –two years. This had not permitted the Arab states from building modern nations where democracy and rule of law would be followed. The people wanted a transformation in such a manner that self-government be established so that each and every Arab citizen exercises the process of democracy. The world War on terror assisted in establishing the suggestion that the Wests- culturally bound top levels symbolizes powerful and authentic bonus for the future, a deception, which was created as either you, possesses autocratic and corresponding peace or else you own al-Qaeda and world Jihad. However, the Arab authority went through various changes that facilitated the victory of revolts. The two baluster of peace in Arab despotism-the army-security multiplex and the country supervision against the economy-were trembled. The growing concern of the human security facilitated the revolts with the government failing to provide in the sectors of education, health and food. The Arab Human Development Report (AHDR) was conducted and suggested that the human security was vital and needed to be addressed in a unique way. According to other reports, it showed that the Middle Eastern region and North Africa were spending huge billions of money in military dissipation while at most 34.6 billion of Arabs were living in extreme poverty and unemployment rates. This was a diverse subject across the entire nation and revolts raised their concerned about empowerment of both the security of people and communities. 3.0 Consequences of the Arab Uprising 3.1 Country-level-Reaction When the Egyptian head of state was forced to withdraw from power, the modern territorial natural movement was established and common actors were forced to change according to the phenomena. Thus, it took two types of approaches: reactive and proactive. As the missives initiated commemorations, policy –makers in some Arab states rushed in quick reactions with aggressive measures to disbar confusion in an attempt of squeezing the collective parties in the blossom. Yemen, Syria and Bahrain were among of the nations that looked for a rigid line over the assertions of their people. Each constituted an exceptional exposition in terms of their progressive and their collective uprisings. The divergent advancement predominantly was contained on the general structures of these communities, the state dynamics, and the worldwide use of weapons. Despite Bahrain’s pearl square squatters being discharged by extreme measures in Quasi-absolute blackout of the ordinary and global media, the affirmations by the public in the lanes of Yemeni went unrecognized by president Ali Abdullah Saleh, until a besiege was almost to declare him lifeless. In Syria, the authority, claiming external participation, shattered down on all demonstrators with militant forces to whom President Bashar Al-Assad declined as permitting ‘shoot-to –murder’ command. The next method was applied to predict the claims of people by reviewing the origins of fear among the communities. Thus, the United Nations Security Council in 1973 formulated the policy measure that prompted Libyan Leader, Colonel Gaddafi, downfall. This facilitated king Abdullah of Saudi Arabia to offer a financial reward to Saudi relatives in prediction of their social complaints. In the taking of a different view, King Mohammed VI suggested bureaucratic transformations. He opted for an enactment of a modern constitution to strengthened destined political and social habitants. The drive of these reforms led to the efficient hearing of demonstrators and thus electing a new rule of law which revived trust in social parliamentary constitutional head of state. 3.2 Regional Reactions The response of the Arab authority to the Arab uprising reacted in a double standard technique. Syria’s connection to the Iranian matters and its tremendous interference in the Lebanese interior matters allowed for its separation. Furthermore, Libyan principal’s peculiar and unpredictable behavior’s followed with his repeated and free noisy arguments with numerous Arab authorities made his disbursement a vital option. Due to the consequences of these phenomena, the presentation of the Arab federations signifies poor quality in their mandates. When the Arab uprisings were ending their initial regime, the two decisions that were formulated by the alliance violated its own authority, which needed an agreement to disbar member country. However, the Arab revolution promoted in the implementation of the alliance dispensation. The request by the GCC to prolong its membership to Morocco and Jordan was yet another result of the Arab uprising. In granting the countries request, a research about their application ought to be carried out for such connection. This move facilitated a lot of social specialists as a way of initiating social disruption against countries. Following the transformations of authority in the Arab nations, the uprising enhanced the indubitable flourishing of leadership led by a firm Islamist essential. In an interview with Ambassador Leon Gross, he alleges that leadership revolutions in the MENA sections will reasonably lead Islamists to ascendancy. The Ambassador claims that some ancient’s analogies ought to be moved from the victory of the broad- based groups in post-soviet central in Europe. Both essences having been discerning as such, the public elected them direct into their stated roles. This seems to be the ordinary characteristics of the post Arab intifadas, mainly as it sounds that neither promoters of Iranian –technique theocracy nor Al Qaeda have managed good in the elections. Instead, the rewards usually get transferred to centrist Muslims union and to development rather than the rebellion transformations. It was too untimely to get the change of power from dictatorships to democratically voted authorities; Sites of distinct policies within the modern custodians of power persisted to be an encouraging trend indication. For instance, Tunisia and Egypt, which are the Islamic group’s focuses on interior affairs and do not scrutinize any battles at the international standards. The Modern modifications of Arab suburbs are not supported by Israel, where many specialists dismiss assertions by current Egyptian principals as the refined edge service. However, in an interview with previous US Ambassador to Israel, Mr. Martin claimed having observed that Muslims Brotherhood (MB) honors their stability treaty with Israel. 3.3 International Reactions The Arab rebellions were both outstanding groups in fighting of democracy and fulfilment of their desired needs. The reluctance following the untimely days of the spread of confusion suggested the surprise of the resolution inventors globally observed. As the springs developed to be more organized, suspicion declined and assertions from all over the world initiated to hail the square inhabitants as lawful sounds for democracy. The Arab uprisings led to the sharing of similar titles in the UNSC between Russia and China. Moscow and Beijing became more coincidental joints, extremely in the Libyan and Syrian illustrations. This is because they were sharing non-interventionist master plans and also did not support the overthrow of President Assad from Authority. 4.0 The essence of revolution The popular revolution that increased the authoritarian leadership in Egypt and Tunisia and prompted the spread of pro-democracy demonstrations shares similar source. Revolts from similar nations were both inspired by homologous set of socio-economic complaints and political objectives. Both rebellion from the two states followed similar courses of phenomena and culminated at the ultimate down-fall of the leadership (Behr and Analtola 3). 5.0 Implications of the Arab uprising The overthrow of unswerving dictators from Tunisia, Libya, Egypt and Yemen showed great importance in the trending of effective decision. However, the political conversions ought to be strengthened because such authorities can be easily reversed in the unfortunate case situation. The revolution in the Arab massive views needs to be surely evaluated and understood. Misconceiving the decisions of the Arab streets in the uprising of these rebellions may be damaging to the external stakeholders. Since the time they were regarded as mice, Arab communities have erupted in an unforeseeable once afresh, after been declared as weak and useless. 6.0 Conclusions of the Arabs Uprisings The Arab revolution has manifested to be a process more than a sequence of phenomena’s. While it’s extensive tenure effect has yet to be evaluated, the Arab awakening complexities the worldwide population and United States, in particular. They have a mandate to make elucidation of the unfolding events and thus initiating the effective techniques in addressing critical problems in the society (Aissa and El- Hassane 21). Works Cited Aissa, Colonel, and El- Hassane, Lieutenant. The Arab Spring: Causes, Consequences, and Implications. 18 March 2012. Web. 9 December 2014. Behr, Timo and Analtola, Milka. The Arab Uprising. March 2011. Web. 9 December 2014. Jamoul, Abbass, Hamze. The Arab Spring: The Root Causes. 20 February 2012. Web. 9 December 2014. Salih, Eldin, Kamal. ‘‘The roots and Causes of the 2011 Arab uprisings”. Pluto Journals, 35.2 (2013): 184-206. Web. Read More