Deductive and Inductive Arguments - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
A deductive argument is an argument in which the premises are correct, and thus the conclusion from that argument is bound to be correct ( A deductive argument is said to be sound if the premises are true that is they are morally and logically correct. For instance,…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Deductive and Inductive Arguments"

Deductive and Inductive Arguments A deductive argument is an argument in which the premises are correct, and thus the conclusion from that argument is bound to be correct ( A deductive argument is said to be sound if the premises are true that is they are morally and logically correct. For instance, an argument with the following premise; Moses is 87 years old, Moses has lived more than eight centuries, and the conclusion for the argument is that Moses is an aged person. This argument is sound given the fact that all of its premises are logically correct hence it means since the premises are correct the conclusion from the argument is bound to be correct.
A deductive argument is said to be unsound if its premises are not logically correct, but then they can be founded upon to form a correct conclusion. For instance, the following premises; Mary is 37 years old, Mary is caring then the conclusion from the premises is Mary is a mother. The argument is unsound since the premises are generalized and thus will not form a good basis for making an informed conclusion. The premises since they are general in nature cannot be said to be logically correct since they are not specific to be based for making informed conclusions hence the argument is unsound.
Inductive premises are not always correct the person in the argument will take them as they are to influence a certain conclusion that is desirable ( The nature of the premises in inductive arguments determines whether the overall conclusion of the argument is weak or strong. For instance; the policemen said Peter committed the murder, so Peter is the murderer. This argument is weak because its based on a section of the overall evidence and thus, cannot be depended upon. On the other hand, if we have premises like these; eyewitnesses said they saw Peter commit the murder, fingerprint evidence from the body of the diseased together with the weapon are identical to Peter’s and Peter confessed to the police to have committed the act, so Peter committed the murder. The argument above is strong since it incorporates a number of evidence that precisely implicates Peter to the murder beyond reasonable doubt.
Therefore, from the aforementioned definitions and illustrations it is evident that the deductive arguments are more compelling than the inductive arguments because their conclusion are correctly premised logically and morally as opposed to the inductive arguments, which are often incorrect and depend upon the perception or intention of the individuals to form a conclusion that can be either strong or weak.
Works Cited Deductive and Inductive Arguments. Web. (n.d.). Available at [Accessd 14 Nov. 2014]. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Deductive and Inductive Arguments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Deductive and Inductive Arguments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
“Deductive and Inductive Arguments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Deductive and Inductive Arguments

Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning

...? Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning Your al affiliation More Shame by Cedar Rapids The Roman Catholic hierarchyin this country has promised accountability and justice for children sexually abused by priests. (2)We fear it has a long way to go. (3)A new inquiry has found that nearly a decade after the scandal engulfed the American church, children are still in peril (4) and some leaders are still stonewalling investigations. A grand-jury report released Feb. 10 accused three priests and a teacher in the Philadelphia Archdiocese of raping two young boys in the 1990s. It also accused a senior church official of knowingly endangering thousands of children by shielding accused priests for years. The...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Deductive and inductive criminal profiling

...? Deductive and Inductive Criminal Profiling Police departments utilize offender profiles, which is described as a series of personal and behavioral characteristics related with particular offenses, to make predictions concerning the kind of person that may commit crimes in the future. Other reasons offender profiles may be used are to identify the type of person that might have already perpetrated a crime for where the police have not identified a credible suspect yet not found an eye-witness to the incident. The term criminal profiling advances to racial profiling when the defining distinctiveness used involves race, religion or ethnicity. Profiling methodologies differ mainly because all profilers are...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework

Inductive and deductive reasoning

...bargaining so that they can negotiate and get their grievances heard by the employer (Brock & Lipsky, 2003). A single employer cannot have control on some of the most crucial characteristics of their lives, for example, their working place. However, when the public workers get an opportunity to join the unions, they gain an upper hand in accomplishing democracy in the workplace. Their voice as one influences the founding of the regulations that have power over them (Cihon & Castagnera, 2011). Deductive reasoning is a form of research that works from a universal point of view to a precise point. On the other hand, inductive reasoning works in the converse way it moves from definite examination to broader...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Analyzing Inductive Arguments

... Analyzing Inductive Arguments In the history of America, presidential polls have attracted dozens of opinion polls that aim at investigating the trend of politics, and the final most likely decision the voters would most likely make in the polls. Pollsters though employing scientific approaches in designing and carrying out such polls are in most cases subjective; some degree of biasness never fails to inform the entire polling process. An example of these is the Pew Research Center poll and the Rasmussen opinion poll, two opinion polls that have some degree of variance and biasness towards the presidential candidates. All in all, biasness towards a candidate results in a deviating opinion poll that presets results that are far... Analyzing...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Using deductive and inductive logic

...On the Issue of Surrogate Decision Maker: Deductive and Inductive Reasoning Introduction The right to die continues to be an issue in the modern time. Those who have embraced it, the right to die remains to be a subject of debate in relation to the logic unique to the subject matter. The practice of aid in dying for a terminally-ill patient is challenged on what means are required to show that the patient chooses to die. Thus, the concept and function of a surrogate decision maker are systematically defined. The concept of surrogate decision maker is embedded in the principle of patient autonomy. This paper chooses the type of a surrogate decision maker as the projection of informed consent -- the competent patient makes a “living... will.”...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Constructing Deductive Arguments

...Deductive Reasoning Argument Your al affiliation Hypothetical situation Deliberate killing of human is acrime and murders should be punished. Abortion is deliberate killing of the unborn human fetus. My neighbors Rosa and Michal aborted their child like many other people in this country. Therefore, they are murderers and should be punished. Fetus is human because it has complete set of DNA and deliberately removing it equates that a human is killed who would have developed into a complete form if the killers were stopped. No doubt, killing is unlawful and those who abort their child should be punished according to law. Evaluation (1)Deliberate killing of human is a crime and (2) murders should be...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments

...Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments Introduction There are two forms of argument ly deductive and inductive, which we study to help in differentiate between correct and incorrect reasoning, A deductive argument is one in which it is supposed that the premises (supporting reasons or evidence) offer an assurance of the reality of the conclusion. The premises herein are envisioned to offer a very strong support for the conclusion in such a way that if the premises are true, the conclusion can under no circumstances be false (IEP, 2003). The conclusion follows with absolute certainty. For example, All human beings are mortal. I am a human being. I am mortal. An inductive argument on the other hand is an argument... , then the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Criminal Profiling Deductive vs Inductive

...Criminal Profiling: Deductive vs. Inductive In the worldwide fight against vicious crime, criminal profiling has become fairly common. This kind of profiling aids the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to capture criminals. Psychological principles are at the very heart of criminal profiling (Turvey, 2011). Analysis of the crime scene is also a handy tool when it comes to criminal profiling. When the detective these two tools, then they can identify the possible characteristics of the purported perpetrator. Criminal profiling refers to the process whereby specific personality traits are inferred for people responsible for committing criminal acts from either behavioral or physical evidence or in some...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Deductive and Inductive Arguments

...Critical Thinking - Model 3 - SLP - Deductive and Inductive Arguments al: Critical Thinking - Model 3 - SLP - Deductive and Inductive Arguments The difference between inductive and deductive arguments has attracted discussion from different scholars. Many have associated the difference to inferential reasoning, power, guarantee, and probability while others focus on the conclusive premises as a basis for an argument. However, the validity of these arguments concretely relies on the truth and the ability to justify probability of conclusion. Evidently, deductive arguments have a logical flow between the premise and conclusion. The logical necessity between the two elements of any argument necessitates the truth of a conclusion... to the...
1 Pages(250 words)Coursework

Create an Inductive and Deductive Argument

...Deductive and Inductive Arguments Deductive and Inductive Arguments Logic philosophers have developed two types of arguments that have been widely used in different fields. One of these types of arguments has been categorized as deductive. According to logic philosophers, deductive arguments are defined by the fact that the conclusion deduced from the premises is always true. This implies that, there is no possibility for the premises being true but the conclusion formed remaining false. Therefore, in deductive arguments, the premises and inferences are the basis on which the conclusion is formed. On the other hand, inductive arguments, which form the second category of arguments, do not necessarily have conclusions that are true... . In...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Deductive and Inductive Arguments for FREE!

Contact Us