Download file to see previous pages...
The Melians was a colony of many islands, but Athens wouldn’t submit to them. They remained neutral and didn’t s tussle with the people. Athenians used violence to evict the Melians from their territory and this made the Melians change their attitude and became hostile.
In the Melian dialogue, Athenians demanded the Melians to give up on their city and compensate them for the destruction caused in the city. In response, the Melians claimed that they would remain neutral and not become enemies so instead they offered friendship. The Athenians argued that they would look weak and the people would undermine their strength, if they accepted the Melians to be neutral and independent (Crawley 2). The Melians countered that it would be a shame and an act of cowardice if they surrendered without a fight. Thucydides stated that, if such an action is taken to keep your empire and your people will not be free and will subdued to slavery, then the people who are free will be considered cowards and weak if they fail to face everything. The Athenians responded and stated that the debate wasn’t about honor, but of self-preservation.
The Melians stated that the Athenians were strong and they could easily win. In response, the Athenians stated that the strong were hopeful and the weak Melians were hopeless and outnumbered. The Melians responded that they had great help from their gods, but Thucydides stated that trust in god would give prosperity for those who stood for the right and not wrong. The Athenians response to the Melians was that gods and man value strength over integrity and the strong can make it but the weak suffer (Crawley 3-4). The Melians argued that the Spartans would come and aid them in their defense. The Athenians responded to this by stating that the Spartans had little to their advantage and more to lose by aiding the Melians. The Athenians concluded that there was nothing wrong in getting a strong enemy, but this statement didn’t change
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Thucydides, the peloponnesian war, the Melian Dialogue ( Book 5, Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/social-science/1659977-thucydides-the-peloponnesian-war-the-melian-dialogue-book-5-chapter-17
(Thucydides, the Peloponnesian War, the Melian Dialogue ( Book 5, Essay)
“Thucydides, the Peloponnesian War, the Melian Dialogue ( Book 5, Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1659977-thucydides-the-peloponnesian-war-the-melian-dialogue-book-5-chapter-17.
With this, it will study the account of Thucydides as participant and recorder of the Peloponnesian War. It will then compare the Peloponnesian narrative with the epic events of the Trojan War in Homer’s Iliad. Lastly, it will show the parallels of the developments in the Peloponnesian War with the Lysistrata and its author’s arguments of the female intervention in warfare with concern to the Iliad’s claim of man’s monopoly in war.
Waltz elucidates that a world of iniquity and corruption cannot and does not have goodness as a natural and evident trope of human behaviour. There shall be people like the Stalin, Bin Laden's and the Idi Amin's whose natural violence can be curbed by violence alone.
The Athenians claimed that if they accept the Melians’ plea to be free from invasion and their claim to being neutral, that they would appear weak in the sights of their foes and their sovereignty would be questioned and
Ancient Greece flourished around these two city-states almost in two separate groups - the Delian league led by Athens and the Peloponnesian league led by Sparta. Most of the other city-states either joined Sparta or Athens to keep up
Athens wanted to assume full control of trade with the southern side of Italy and Sicily. They retaliated and eventually Corinth helped Potidaea in revolted against Athens. This led to them turning to Sparta who was their ally for help. Athens and Sparta formed two major and
, Athens chose their general Pericles to deliver this eulogy for their departed Athenian soldiers who sacrificed themselves at an opening battle of the Peloponnesian War (Brians par.1). His speech reflected dispute on the tradition of praising the dead so instead he praised
consider all the possibilities which in Athenian’s perspective would lea to the calamity of the situation and rectify the animosity which , with the course of time had developed in Athenians for the island of Melos and their natives as they were pro-Spartans ( a Greek city
When it occurs, the total amount of commodities which can be bought using a certain amount of money declines as compared to what it used to purchase. In such a situation, it implies that a person should look for a lot of money in order to meet all their demands. This
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Thucydides, the peloponnesian war, the Melian Dialogue ( Book 5, chapter 17) for FREE!