Democratic Peace Theory - Essay Example

This version can be termed as the amalgamation and the outlook of the recent political events and progress. The engagement of war based on the claim of democracy is often seen as the paradox, however one of the three prominent versions of peace theory.

The global order is advocated for in the form of democracy prevailing even if it required aggressive means adoption. The second version of this theory stresses the economic aspect of equality and balancing. This form does not include direct confrontation or any measures that are otherwise taken for the purpose of democratic enactment. This version of the theory is considered to be closer to the original theme that was introduced as an alternative to the other theories that advocated war offensives and other extreme measures.

The third version of this theory is related to international relations enactment. Although the aim is to ensure democratic setups, yet mutual cooperation and mutual co-existence are two of the factors and variables that are stressed in this version. The collective aims under this doctrine include poverty eradication, economic prosperity, respecting the sovereignty and fighting all other ills and evils that are faced by the modern world (Zimelis). The version pertaining to the global community based on mutual cooperation and respecting one another’s sovereignty amounts to the more relevant and most likely implementable form of democratic peace theory.

The theory is compelling based on the fact that the world has seen different other forms of ideologies yet the injustice, inequality and the oppression of the mighty against the weak has not stopped and is still in practice. As a result and response, the democratic peace theory serves as the possible remedy against the prevailing desperate outlook of the imbalanced world. The advocates of the peace theory version of using force to enact democracy defend it by stating that the lack of action and intervention thereof means giving a free hand to the tyrants and not helping the weak and the poor. They term it a morally binding obligation upon the stronger and democratic nations enforcing democracy in those countries that have been kept void of people’s form of government- democracy.