The Cooperation of China and the United States - Essay Example

A world in which the U.S. and China cooperate, leading to worldwide cooperation on global challenges Introduction: The economic growth in United States has seen a slow phase after the Recession left its mark on world history. There are more Americans without jobs than there are jobs in the American market. The present study derives inspiration from the possibility of creating this Fusion alternative world, through a co-operative approach to the People’s Republic of China, and runs a critical assessment of the factors that will lead to successful development of this alternative world. It is not very surprising that China, which is the world’s second largest market after America, is slowly heading to a take over from the rest of the world’s markets. Yes, there are predictions that a positive outlook makes it possible for us to think that a fusion alternative world can be created. However, United States will still look for indicators that pose a threat to integrity of its economic, social, and political values. On the outset, we must start by understanding the nuances of the fusion alternate world that has been discussed in the 2012 National Intelligence Council Report, Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. Fusion Alternative World Revisited The main aim of the fusion alternative world is to bring about global harmony and development through the co-operation between United States and China. While both are world powers in their own right, experts hope that this fusion alternative world (NICR, 2012) will have an amalgamation of economic growth practices found in both the countries. It is clearly evident that the theory banks on considering China as one of the most influential Asian powers next to India and Japan. And it is understood that when a market as large as China decides to join hands with America, the rest of Asia, will only follow suit. This would lead to global co-operation in the form of exchange of trade services and goods (Ikenberry & Mustanduno, 2013, p.142). Also, global challenges like poverty, unemployment, and terrorism would be taken care of, as both these powers will be more active in exercising political and military control in regulating economic and social disorders within the rest of the world countries. Challenges and Promises: While this picture looks brightly promising, the fact that United States wishes to stick to its individuality in terms of economy, political thinking and social prowess may come in the way of this highly promising alternative world scenario. For starters, the equilibrium that the fusion alternative world promises may not meet the predicted levels of satisfaction especially for the US consulate (Slaughter, 2011). While US stand for liberalism, China stands for constructivism (Wang, 2013, p.83). In order to understand and assess the promises and challenges of the alternative world being discussed here, we need to go straight into understanding the Chinese economy. China has been using original technology and raw material driven industry to develop its economy. Policies that have ruled the roost in the Chinese economy (Wang, 145) include cradle-to-cradle thinking and recyclable human resources. China, perhaps, is the first country to have used its prisoners to develop technological gadgets of international importance. The cradle-to-cradle thinking (McDonough & Braungart, 2003) mainly features durable goods as products of service. And the fact that these goods are transported back to the original country makes it easy for China to recover labor costs. Flow of material, be it in the form of raw materials or finished goods, is the highlight feature of the fusion alternative world. It is important to note here that although United States is taking notice of all these policies, it is still far from replicating them or developing an algorithm that will emulate and apply the policies. Yes, United States does not want to delve into experiments which have not been standardized. And with this picture of US and China co-operating with each other, we understand that US will need to take immensely important steps to change the existing social, economic, and political structure of its countries, which is a big challenge in itself, to match up to the exceptionalism of China’s foreign policies (Dunne et al, 2013, p. 134). Putting the new order into place would pose a few hiccups for the United States consulate. These obstacles arise when anyone tries to fit the fusion alternative world (NICR, 2012) into the existing world scenario today. For example, when US and China join hands to co-operate with each other, the economic interests of US will either see disappointment or undergo a massive change. Firstly, the economic policies like cradle-to-cradle thinking will need to be established within the American system. This is not hard since Chicago has already started embracing this predominantly Chinese policy (Slaughter, 2011) to bring in major changes in the greenery of the city. However, the lack of excessive man-power and raw materials will pose a threat to this economic revolution that the fusion alternative world will induce in US. The establishment of the fusion alternative world also poses security and identity issues that hurt the integrity of the US national structure. For example, the military units that will be sent in from either country will have postings in parts of US that need control. The fact also remains that this will lead to higher chances of leak of important security information of the country through the foreign intelligence operating within it. There is already a great amount of talk regarding communist thinking taking over the American structure which has started mainly after the entry of China in the UN. America has been criticized for giving in to the growing nuclear prowess of China. If the fusion alternative world is to be believed then there are chances that the liberal identity of US will be influenced by China’s communist thinking (Dunne et al, 2013, p.213), leading to internal clashes amongst American groups which have and have not embraced communist thinking. In short, the stage gets all set for a collapse of the political framework of the country. Combating these Challenges In Reality: No country is complete without a clear definition of the different sections of the society that comprises its social, economic, and political identity. And all the critical points mentioned above are crucial to the establishment of the fusion alternative world, US can easily wriggle out of the fix that these challenges pose to put it in. All that is needed is a complete dedication towards ensuring that these critical changes are brought about within the American society in a systematic way. While trotting on its way to achieve its goals like creating more employment and bringing in financial security, America needs to talk to its people and make them take part in the processes that bring in this change. Not all of China’s national goals can become America’s national goals and vice versa. They are two distinct economies and to create a harmony between the two, America will see a great number of crucial changes within its society. Fractions of the US community which play major role in allowing the American population to adapt to these changes must be called into action. Political tools like speeches, agreements with local public bodies, and grants to improve the living conditions must be used to assure people that things are turning for the better. Geographic or economic tools (McDonough & Broungart, 2003) like reduced visa costs, inexpensive travel packages, and better forex rates will help improve the country’s economy whilst encouraging these changes to take place. Further on, military units of force may be required to take disciplinary action in places that show outrage or revolt. However, the action we need here has to be more authoritative in nature and not necessarily oppressive. It is important to note here that military action needs to concentrate on safeguarding the security and secrecy of the US intelligence, even if troops from other countries are present in the same area. While military elements of power take care of the more confidential aspects of the political and economical identity of US, international organizations like UN has to come forward to do their bit in familiarizing the masses regarding the process of the change. There will be a need to educate and inform the latest developments to members of the society. NGOs that operate in singular zones have to come forward to take part in tackling the challenge of societal change and dynamic stability that the fusion alternative world is going to create in the US system. Although NGOs are not strictly governmental bodies, there indulgence is important and much better than the scenario of non-state actors taking the lead and solving global challenges, an event that happens in the Nonstate World described in the 2012 National Intelligence Council Report, Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. Conclusion: The discussion has given an assessment of possibilities that the Fusion alternative world wants the American society to embrace. While we are aware of the major challenges that the change will pose, we still maintain that through careful consideration of societal and political factors, the changes can be brought in. In short, United States of America can be expected to co-operate with a country like China, and develop solutions to global challenges common to both the economies. The main focus is creating a realist approach to international policy through the co-operation between two powerful nations of the world. References: 2012 National Intelligence Council Report. (2012) Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds, retrieved on April 21, 2014 from: http://globaltrends2030.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/global-trends-2030-november2012.pdf Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2013). International Relations Theories, London: Oxford University Press. Ikenberry, G. J., & Mastanduno, M. (2013). International relations Theory and The Asia Pacific. New York: Columbia University Press. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2003) The Cradle-to-Cradle Alternative, State Of The World 2004, retrieved on April 21, 2014 from: http://www.mcdonough.com/speaking-writing/the-cradle-to-cradle-alternative/#.U1Ut41WSzEk Slaughter, A. (2011). International Relations, Principle Theories, Princeton University retrieved on April 21, 2014 from: http://www.princeton.edu/~slaughtr/Articles/722_IntlRelPrincipalTheories_Slaughter_20110509zG.pdf Wang, H. (2013). The Rise of China and Chinese International Relations. Hong Kong: Lexington Books. Read More