Dialogue between the Head and the Heart - Literature review Example

The heart admits that it is in grief and regrets all the actions t has done before. The counter argument is presented in a genius way by the heart implying that the heart can correct all the past mistakes. The head claims that the heart condemns others but still goes back to embrace and welcome them. On defense part, the hearts admit the mistakes and asks the head to provide any solution if any exists. The head fails to provide this demanded solution and it marks a failure on the part of the head.

Another argument is raised relating to the moment when the head and the heart visited Legrand and Molinos. The head claims that it preferred the hearts opinion was not present when making decisions implying that the heart provided a wrong opinion contributing to a wrong decision. The head also claims that it was busy concentrating on constructive ideas while the heart was busy making friends and not contributing to meaningful development. The head claims that many friends took advantage of the hearts weakness to lie and pretend before the heart.

The heart takes a chance to mock the events of the day that the head claimed to have done meaningful activities. In its mockery, the heart mocks the beautiful cities and the beautiful sceneries they both witnessed. According to the heart, the head did not do anything meaningful for that day. The head attempts to create situations to make the heart doubt if the friends will come back. The heart defends the situation recollecting that the friends had promised to come back the following year. The heart develops no doubt in the promise and believes that God is aware of the future.

The heart believes that the quality of its decisions is far much attractive than the rest. The heart compares its products with several other options created by others to prove that the heart is far much superior. The heart presents its powerful ability to attract many clients than other competitors through forgiveness, friendship, understanding and many other qualities of hospitality. Conclusion The heart proves to provide more opinions and defense to stand that the head cannot compare. Head seems only to blame and not giving any constructive ideas.

In addition, the head fails to provide a good defense to its accusations and gives up easily without counter accusing the heart. The head tends to agree with the heart at the end showing how powerful the heart can be in terms of reasoning, defending and counter-accusations.