How Should Christians Interact with Psychology - Essay Example

Response I agree that the scope of human knowledge is limited, but that cannot be translated into the assumption that psychology means sinful people thinking sinfully about other sinful people. While it is true that everybody commits sins, it is also true that everybody commits acts of nobility and virtue. People do think sinfully but they think benevolently as well. Your response understates and underestimates people’s ability to make a positive contribution in the society with limited knowledge.

I agree with you that psychology and Christian counseling can be integrated and I particularly like that you mentioned the need to filter the psychological concepts through the Word of God. In my opinion, psychology and Christian counseling should be integrated, but whenever a clash between the two occurs at a point, the Word of God should be deemed sacred and worthy of more respect than the tradition. Response 2I completely agree with your response. I also believe that to do sin is part of being human, but that, in no way, takes the ability from a human being away to think positively about others.

When used rightly, psychological counseling becomes more of a social service and a way of contributing to the well-being and development of the society than just a profession. I like how you equate this to the message of religion which is to help others. I agree that guidance offered by the Scripture cannot be blindly applied to every matter as all intricate matters that differ from each other in details require prudent understanding, interpretation, and application of the guidelines of the Scripture.

Nothing is more desirable than an approach “informed by both psychology and Christian theology” (Entwistle, 2010, p. 89). References:Entwistle, D. N. (2010). Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity, Second Edition: An Introduction to Worldview Issues, Philosophical Foundations, and Models of Integration. Wipf and Stock Publishers.