Tony Blair's Government - Case Study Example

Tony Blairs government between 1997 and 2007 was a success. Tony Blairs government between 1997 and 2007 was unquestionably a success. Tony Blair successfully aided the United States in overthrowing Saddam Hussein from power. One successful feather in the cap of Tony Blair is the overthrow of the Saddam Hussein Iraqi military dictatorship. Further, Tony Blairs government at this time is very successful because the strong relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom has kept the world in a peaceful state. And, Tony Blair spent government money for the health of the people. In addition, Tony Blair was instrumental in keeping world peace. Tony Blair infused money for educating the youth. The people who felt attacking Iraq was Tony Blairs waterloo are wrong. INTRODUCTION BODY: One successful feather in the cap of Tony Blair is the overthrow of the Saddam Hussein Iraqi military dictatorship. Tony blair was right in helping the United States go to war with Iraq. In fact, Tony Blairs decision to send British Troops into Iraq to topple, capture and try Saddam Hussein for his governments crimes against Kuwait, and murders of some Muslim sects that were against his style of government. Tony Blair, Mr. Bush of the United States and other other nations were right in attacking Iraq. Today, the arrogant Saddam Hussein is finally gone. Now, democracy is slowly but surely unfolding in the once military rule of an army general. Further, Tony Blairs government at this time is very successful because the strong relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom has kept the world in a peaceful state. James Naughtie aptly described Tony Blair as the United States watchdog. Tony Blair had gained the trust and confidence of the Bill Clinton as well the the younger President Bushes administration. He is called the American watchdog, Alsatian, for Tony Blair warns the American leaders of possible dangers that will be knocking in the next few months or years on the doors of many free nations. Tony Blair does not think twice as he immediately orders his British forces to attack Saddam Hussein during the desert storm era where Kuwait was freed from the clutches of Saddam Hussein (Wheatcroft 2004). In fact, Tony Blair was instrumental in alerting the Clinton administration about the debacle on the United States that would arise if the United States did not take any forcible action in the Kosovo arena. Tony Blair also persuaded President Bush to aid in the war where the Serbs were involved. In addition, Tony Blairs speech to the Economic Club in Chicago, United States in 1999 had emphasised the importance for the United States use of preemptie strikes if the first step of using diplomatic means to end the Taliban war in Afghanistan and the Balkans failed. In response, President Bush saw Tony Blair as a positive force and a real friend in time of need. President Bush even saw Tony Blair as the prophets who forecasted that doom brougth about by the September 11 airplane attacks in New York and the Pentagon (Thomas 2005). Further, Tony Blairs success during the elections in 1997 until 2007 was because his labour partys battle cry was “The socialist tradition upholds ethical values such as equality, social justice, fellowship, and community. Its adherents typically believe in reciprocal altruism as a condition for the highest possible moral development of all. The proper goal of political action is a moral community in which all citizens attain freedom through cooperation”(Bevir, and OBrien 2001, 535). Tony Blairs Labour partys success was because his party believed that the socialist tradition that upholds ethical values such as social justice, equality, community and fellowship is what makes the British life more enjoyable. Tony Blairs party believes that political action is a moral community where all the United Kingdom citizens will achieve their true freedom with a secret ingredient. That secret ingredient is cooperation among all sectors of the British society. Tony Blair is a staunch follower of Tawneys philosophy. This philosophy states that equality, liberty and fellowship among the people will only prosper in a community where all the citizens are clothed, fed and sheltered. In the United Kingdom, Tony Blair was successful with his New Deal program. This program states that all young people between the ages of 18 to 24 must work, undertake full time schooling or training, engage in voluntary work or even work in an environmental task force (Bevir, and OBrien 2001, 535). And, Tony Blair spent government money for the health of the people. Tony Blair insisted that government money should flow out for the benefit of the United Kingdom citizens. In fact, Britain had the second biggest over -all increase in government spending when compared with other advanced countries between 1997 to 2005 alone. Tony Blair was instrumental in this government action because he insisted that spending government money to cure and maintain the citizens health was to raise the British healthcare spending to the health care spending to the average European Union level. In addition, Tony Blair was instrumental in keeping world peace. Tony Blair ordered the British soldiers to check the Slobodan Milosevic armies in Kosovo. Tony Blair also ordered the British troops to help end the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. Tony Blair was also ordered overthrow of the psychopathic religious right in Afghanistan. But the biggest part Tony Blair played was annihilation of the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein. This proves that Tony Blair will commit his troops to battle without thinking twice in the name of liberty (Cohen 2006). However, Tony Blair also had time to host the Commonwealth Sports 2002 events where different heads of states attended with the help of the Queen (Mcintyre 2002). Plus, Tony Blair infused money for educating the youth. “Another feature that makes these reforms palatable is money: The Blair Government is spending more of its own and leveraging a great deal of private-sector support. Unlike the U.S. federal government, which provides only about 8 percent of school funding, London provides the lions share of money for Englands schools. And whereas U.S. efforts seem simply to be pumping more money into static public schools, Blair makes sure that new money isnt spent on more of the same. Under a government plan, extra money comes to a secondary school if it adopts a specialty: a teaching emphasis on science, arts, mathematics, business, engineering, or foreign languages (Hill 2005). Likewise the OECD shows that the United Kingdom has been very economically profitable under the leadership of Tony Blair. The people who felt attacking Iraq was Tony Blairs waterloo are wrong. David Aaranovitch criticised the Tony Blair leadership stating that the departing prime minister Tony Blair is a mnedacious manipulating, spin -obsessed fraudster who did not lay all his cards on the table when asking the British public to rally behind the British Soldiers as they ravaged and bombed Saddam Husseins Iraq. David further described Tony Blair as a man who would go all out to take money from the rich citizens and shower them with peerages and favourable decision as well as suborning the British political scene (Van der Galien, 2007). Some people in the United Kingdom and the rest of the world argue that the attack on Iraq was wrong because the charges were Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destructions. These weapons of mass destruction thought to be chemical in nature and that Saddam planned to use these deadly weapons againts its neighbors like Israel. This argument is definitely wrong. For, the members of the United Nations that included the United States and the United Kingdom had asked permission from Saddam Hussein to allow the United Nations inspectors to inspect all possible sites where these weapons of mass destructions could have been hidden. There were even suspicions that these weapons of mass destructions were hidden in hospitals to avoid being hit by the night attacks done by the United States, United Kingddom and its allies. However, Saddam Hussein would not allow the United Nations inspectors to freely (The key word is freely) go where ever they suspected that the weapons of mass destruction could have been hidden. However, Saddam Hussein and his loya followers refused to freely (the key word is again freely) go where they wanted to go in order to come up with a report that Iraq indeed does not have weapons of mass destruction. The refusal of Saddam Hussein to freely inspect all possible hiding places of the weapons of mass destruction irked and caused doubts in the minds of the United Nations inspectors. In fact, one United Nations inspector theorised that Iraq indeed is hiding weapons of mass destruction. CONCLUSION: Tony Blairs government between 1997 and 2007 was a success. Surelyy, oe successful feather in the cap of Tony Blair is the overthrow of the Saddam Hussein Iraqi military dictatorship. Definitely, Tony Blairs government at this time is very successful because the strong relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom has kept the world in a peaceful state. Convincingly, Tony Blair spent government money for the health of the people. Undoubtedly, Tony Blair was instrumental in keeping world peace. Clearly, Tony Blair infused money for educating the youth. Conclusively, the people who felt attacking Iraq was Tony Blairs waterloo are wrong. In addition, Tony Blair was very intrumental in converting the British international currency from the London Pound to the European dollar. However, the weakening of the American dollar valuation has created hatred against the Tony Blair administration. A recent survey among the British students showed that only eighteen percent prefer to use the European dollar as a means of payment. On the other hand, a big fifty -two percent of the British people prefer to use the British pound as a means of buying and selling goods in the local British market (reference: http://www.icmresearch.co.uk/white-papers/never-say-never.pdf#search=%22tony%20blair%22). Works Cited Bevir, Mark, and David OBrien. 2001. New Labour and the Public Sector in Britain. Public Administration Review 61, no. 5: 535. Cohen, Nick. 2006. Blairism: An Apology; Many on the Left See Tony Blair as an Aberration, a Cuckoo in Their Nest, Writes Nick Cohen, Who Used to Think That Way. This Is a Mistake The Government Is Far More Old Labour Than You Might Think. New Statesman, September 18, 16+. Hill, Paul T. 2005. Lessons from Blairs School Reforms. Policy Review , no. 131: 65+. Mcintyre, W. David. 2002. Commonwealth Credibility under Challenge after Coolum: W. David McIntyre Reports on the Postponed Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting Held at Coolum in March 2002 and Suggests That It Marked a Set Back to the Credibility of the Association. New Zealand International Review 27, no. 3: 2+. Thomas, Tony. 2005. Tony Blair as George Bushs Watch Dog. Contemporary Review, April, 239+. Van der Galien, Tony Blair – Success or Failure, The Moderate Voice, retrieved May 7, 2008, http://themoderatevoice.com/places/europe/united-kingdom/britain/12752/tony-blair-success-or-failure/ Wheatcroft, Geoffrey. 2004. The Tragedy of Tony Blair: When He Came to Office, the Prime Minister Seemed Another JFK. Now His Mystique Is Dissipated and His Promise Shattered. the Chief Cause of His Failure Is the War in Iraq-A War He Led His People into against Their Will, for Reasons That Were Not True. The Atlantic Monthly, June, 56+. ICTM researcch., www.icmresearch.co.uk/white-papers/never-say-never.pdf#search=%22tony%20blair%22 Read More