Summary to essay on topic "Article review on a Revised British COnstitution"
Studlar, a distinguished Professor of political science in the university of Virginia, USA, was actually a lecture delivered in the university of Cincinnati in 1998 when, Tony Blair, prime minister of Britain, was in the process of introducing…
Download file "Article review on a Revised British COnstitution" to see previous pages...
cular importance because Blair’s proposal were seen as highly significant as the Britain is a unitary state with all centralized power vested on the central government not having much transparency in its working processes.
The article primarily discusses seven major constitutional proposals of the Blair government which it intended to reform and implement. Let us write or edit the essay on your topic "Article review on a Revised British COnstitution" with a personal 20% discount.. Try it now They are devolution of Scotland and Wales; election of Mayor of London and major urban areas; removal of voting rights of hereditary peers in the House of Lords; incorporation of European human rights into British laws; freedom of information acts; electoral reforms at various level of government and referendum on changing the electoral system for member of parliament; and legislation for separate Supreme Court as independent judicial authority and stable government in northern Ireland.
The Blair government was able to make significant inroad into the major constitutional reform proposals and help form stable governments in Scotland and wale after devolution. Even the problem of Northern Ireland, beset with internal violence, was relatively sorted out. Decentralization of power to local councils and mayors and right to information went a long way in creating transparency in government work. Referendums were held to encourage and promote public participation in government decision making were hailed as highly popular mechanism. The one area that became controversial was the reforms in the electoral system whereby though ‘single member district system would be retained but instead of casting a vote for one person only, electorate would rank candidates in order of preference, thus assuring majority rather than a plurality of vote for the winner’.
The reform came under a lot of flak from major political parties because the constitutional reform had undermined their political supremacy over the smaller political parties with regional interests. Even the labor party members had shown their resentment against
...Download file "Article review on a Revised British COnstitution" to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document "Article review on a Revised British COnstitution"
(“Article review on a Revised British COnstitution Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1545454-article-review-on-a-revised-british-constitution
(Article Review on a Revised British COnstitution Essay)
“Article Review on a Revised British COnstitution Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1545454-article-review-on-a-revised-british-constitution.
Cited: 0 times
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC "Article review on a Revised British COnstitution"
Democratization of the development, distribution, and use of the media content is a potential feature of the new media. New media generates real-time new and unregulated content. A vast majority of the technologies included in the new media are digital. They are dense, networkable, interactive, and can be manipulated.
The author states that the important feature of the British constitution is that it has no written constitution, which lends flexibility and discretion to the judiciary in taking decisions. Parliamentary sovereignty is the main feature of British constitution. Though the constitution is unwritten in one single document, it is not entirely unwritten.
438). Loader and Sparks questioned the validity of the social and political uses of criminology, as well as in changing the old methods established in the study of crime and punishment. It was also established that the methods being implemented in the United States are most likely to be valid due to their procedures not based on criminology itself.
To what extent does the evidence suggest that these propositions are valid And, in your scholarly opinion which of the two has more weight
The British Constitution is uncodified and can be found in a variety of documents. Advocates of this form of constitution believe that the uncodified system encourages flexibility and changes can be made easily.
However, this is not the case in the United Kingdom. Constitutions differ as regards their detailed features, though most are nowadays written. The principle characteristics of the British Constitution, which distinguish it from nearly all others, include features, such as it being unwritten and flexible.
The European constitution is threatening to overtake British constitution, considered to be the mother of all the constitutions and there are apprehensions in the air.
In his recent speech as party leader at Labour Conference, Prime Minister Gordon Brown Declared: "Britain has been tested and not found wanting.
Thus the British constitution can be contrasted with other constitutions like the Constitution of the United States of America. (Barendt, 1997) Brazier (2001) has for instance stated that:
"A British citizen has to seek the rules of the constitution in a daunting number of places - legislation, judicial decisions, statements about constitutional conventions, the law and practice of Parliament, European Community law, and so on." (p.3)
In recent months, as the media and the community have complained of excessive force by local law enforcement officials, the definition for democracy appears to have been covered by the need to protect the public from police misconduct.
Overall my concept of assessing question requires the discussion of the notion of the Rule of law and how it has developed within and through the Western Notions of freedom and democracy.
Moreover, the principle of separation of powers assumes that certain functions should be carried out by different institutions with neither impinging the other’s authority2. As Montesquieu argued; “All would be lost if the same man or the same ruling body……were