The paper "Integration Theory And Policy Development In The EU " seeks to explain the role of integration theory in EU policy development. The study of integration theory forms the basis for understanding various policy developments in the European Union…
Download file to see previous pages...
The EU ozone policy grew from scientific research conducted on the ozone layer in the 70’s which showed that industrial pollutants including those produced by certain home appliances and household sprays were having great and far-reaching effects on the ozone layer surrounding the Earth. To minimize potential hazards and set international standards, the EU together with its executive body the European Commission partook in the framing of multilateral environmental agreements. Since the EU was the biggest exporter of CFC’s due to surplus production, its involvement in developing an ozone policy was crucial. However, the EU is dependent on the effectiveness of the EC and the subsequent participation of the member states into agreeing with the policy. In implementing this EU policy, the two grand theories of integration, neo-functionalism, and intergovernmental work in different ways. One of the earliest policies that illustrated the theory of neo-functionalism was the Common Agricultural Policy in the 1960s (Lindberg 1963). A neo-functionalistic approach uses the technical and scientific knowledge of ozone depletion data and the substances causing the effect, to allow technocrats in the EC to draw out schemes that curtail or eliminate the use of ozone depletion substances (ODS). Integration using the neo-functionalistic method permits a sharing of scientific knowledge among similar sectors in the various member states, enabling manufacturing and technology companies in those states to implement a common strategy....
Integration also causes a natural spill over of knowledge and activities into other associated sectors (EPSnet). A functional-spill over occurs when certain processes are functionally connected to each other due to the intermeshing of the economy (Lindberg and Scheingold 1970: 117). The common goal of eliminating ODS needs no mandate and thus the populace of the EU is left out. The formation and implementation of an agreement relating to regional issues compels the various states to adopt the common policy (Schmitter 1969). A few public interest and environmental groups may be involved in the process and together a common strategy may be formulated but by and large the institutions of the EU are on their own in the decision making process. The problem that may arise is when a state is slow to implement the policy thus stalling the integration process.
On the other hand, an intergovernmental approach would elevate discretionary powers of the EU member states rather than the supranational institutions. Since the states themselves remain the principal arbiters of integration, they possess decision making powers as to whether or not the EU ozone policy should be implemented locally. Here too more powers rest with the national executives of the states and their advisory boards. Their decision to accept or reject the EU ozone policy can override the power of the supranational institutions of the EU such as the European Commission. The consequence is that unequal implementation in the entire EU with some states applying the ozone policy while others rejecting it or delaying its implementation. With the intergovernmental approach the main issue of ozone depletion is never truly addressed by common consensus. Various
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Integration Theory And Policy Development In The EU Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/politics/1516885-eu-policy-development
(Integration Theory And Policy Development In The EU Essay)
“Integration Theory And Policy Development In The EU Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1516885-eu-policy-development.
Why does the EU rely so much on policy networks to make its political system function? The policy network model of 1970 first highlighted the aspects of post parliamentary politics. With Europeanization of various policies implementing sectors, EU has increased their dependence on policy networks (Richardson, 2006, p.1014).Such networks have provided the interest groups with multiple opportunities for framing policies (Richardson, 2006, p.1015).
However, the Danish government was generally thought to express a profoundly cynical perspective of the European Union (EU). The membership application to the EC of Finland and Sweden has attracted massive interest in the Nordic region; however, it was the rejection of the Maastricht Treaty of the EC by Danish voters in June 1992 that greatly attracted the world’s attention (Friis, 2002).
European integration has seen the light of the day through European Union, as well as the Council of Europe. European integration can be credited for numerous achievements within the last sixty years with prominent accomplishments being the creation of an internal market where people, goods, services, and capital can move freely (Topan 2001, p.30).
The alternative debates embrace a number of new aspects of integration within the EU which entails a number of insights. These include a different analysis from that of "new monetarism" (see Arestis and Sawyer, 1998), new objectives for economic policy to include employment and growth, and new institutions to reduce various kinds of disparities across the EU.
Western countries offered them huge opportunities and consequently large scale migrations began to take place. This trend that had begun for over a century ago has intensified in the last two decades followed up with large scale legal and illegal trafficking of individuals in the West especially the European countries.
However, a common European approach to achieving healthy indoor environments is desirable for several reasons including providing a broader recognition of the problem of unhealthy indoor air, setting a policy example for all 27 EU member states, and achieving greater public health equity across the different European nations.
The citizens of EU derive some kind of benefit from the EU budget. The member states have approved which actions should be financed from the common budget. It is agreed that Taxpayers' money must be utilised in building of roads, research financing, environment cleaning, entire Europe to be inhabited, assure safe food and back up a number of other causes either directly or indirectly.