Nobody downloaded yet

U.S. foreign policy in Iraq - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The expression “the first casualty of war is the truth” would probably be appropriately applied to all of the wars between nations throughout the entire history of warfare. The Iraq war will always be branded as the only war that was based completely on lies…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.5% of users find it useful
U.S. foreign policy in Iraq
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"U.S. foreign policy in Iraq"

Download file to see previous pages The expression “the first casualty of war is the truth” would probably be appropriately applied to all of the wars between nations throughout the entire history of warfare. The Iraq war will always be branded as the only war that was based completely on lies.The truth died several deaths prior to the human deaths that occurred due to the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq (March 2003 – August, 2010). As the war progressed following the 2003 invasion, the American public progressively lost confidence in the Bush administration’s war policy as they grew to understand more and more what the majority of the rest of the world had realized since the first nights bombing of Baghdad. The war is undeniably illegal as defined by the United Nations (UN) and International Court of Justice (ICJ), the two most paramount legal bodies in the world. Iraq had no link to terrorism, no weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and no legal rationale to attack. Despite this, Bush decided to invade the Republic of Iraq for causes deemed objectionable to the majority of other countries so he frequently relied on and utilized false information to rationalize it. He lied. This discussion will examine how the truth was a casualty early and often during the lead up to the war and outlines some of the consequences brought about by these far-reaching and deadly deceptions. Bush voiced his disagreement to the concept of ‘nation building’ during the 2000 presidential election debates but as president waged an undeclared war against a sovereign country that had neither attacked first nor threatened to. Immediately following and as a reactionary reply to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Bush stated the county’s intention to begin a ‘War on Terrorism’ which he portrayed as a protracted battle against those that would use terrorist actions in addition to the countries that enabled them. The eventual culmination of the selective legal reasoning and rhetoric concerning the ‘War on Terror’ was Bush’s order of the military to invade both Afghanistan and Iraq, an illegal action on many fronts. Bush had constantly claimed that these actions were legal. First, he argued, due to language existing within the UN Security Council Resolution 1441 regarding Iraq and secondly, the invasions were an act of self-defense which is permitted by international law. Conversely, according to Richard Perle, advisor to U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and official of the U.S. Defense Policy Board, “international law ... would have required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone.” (Burkeman & Borger, 2003). However, this option would have been “morally unacceptable” according to the Bush administration. Bush chose to solicit then followed the advice of biased, self serving legal opinion from a low-level Justice Dept. employee despite strong disagreement by higher level personnel within the Dept. in addition to and the U.S. State Department which cautioned against ignoring international law and U.N. laws in addition to covenants of the Geneva Convention. The Bush administration was determined in its careless use of military force and disregard for laws established to by the world’s community of nations. The initial foreign incursion of the U.S. military along with the ‘coalition of the willing’ in its ‘War on Terror’ was Afghanistan, more specifically the Taliban terrorist faction based in that country. The U.S. claimed to possess ‘clear and compelling evidence,’ that the State of Afghanistan was giving refuge to terrorists, as did Iraq. However, if this assertion were true, why then didn’t the Bush administration divulge this information to the UN Security Council so as to obtain legal grounds to invade? The U.S. defended its invasion and occupation of Iraq to the countries of the world by announce, if not substantiating, that it was a undertaking to remove WMD which endangered not only the U.S. but all other countries as ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“U.S. foreign policy in Iraq Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1413830-us-foreign-policy-in-iraq
(U.S. Foreign Policy in Iraq Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/politics/1413830-us-foreign-policy-in-iraq.
“U.S. Foreign Policy in Iraq Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1413830-us-foreign-policy-in-iraq.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
U.S. foreign policy
...Foreign Policy. Lexington Books. Cox, Michael and Stokes, Doug. 2008. U.S. Foreign Policy. OUP. Dobson, Alan P and Marsh, Steve. 2006. US Foreign Policy since 1945. Routledge. Herring, George C. 2008. From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations Since 1776. OUP. Hook, Steven W. 2010. U.S. Foreign Policy: The Paradox of World Power. CQ Press College. Hunt, Michael H. 2009. Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy. Yale University Press. Lafeber, Walter. 1994. The American Age: United States...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
American Foreign Policy
...of Foreign Policy” 2). The article “Making up; Soft Power” illustrates use of hard power. The U.S. invasion of Iraq in the fight against al-Qaeda has been termed as use of hard power. The U.S. government used raw power in an effort to crush the outlawed group. The America’s interest was to fight terrorism. The U.S government has been criticized on many occasions for meddling with the Middle East, yet, it does so little to solve underlying problems. In Libya, the U.S. government exercised hard power by ousting the then president Muammar Qaddaffi from power. The U.S. has interest in humanitarian welfare following...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
U.S. influence on the Iraq Oil Economy
...to as the prerequisite for reducing Saddam's Hussein's debts. The oil law has resulted in a number of disputes, spanning religious groups, secular civil societies and even oil experts as well as unions. Researchers, investigating the oil economy of Iraq are of the opinion that the oil law will result in creating rifts within the country, as opposed to uniting it as was initially made to believe. (Slick Connections: US Influence on Iraqi Oil, 2007) The US influence became evident as early as the beginning of 2001, when a list of "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts" was brought out by the White House Taskforce. (The Struggle Over Iraqi Oil, 2007) This was followed by the drafting of the country's oil...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
U.S. Perspectives and Foreign Policy in Latin America
...it is the infallibility of the market." For Johnson, neoliberalism is "the foundation for civil liberties, markets, and democracy" that "derives from the classic liberalism of 18th century moral philosophers who proposed that individuals should be free to do as they see fit and own and dispose of property as they wish with minimal state interference." 10 On U.S. foreign policy, hereunder is Stephen Johnson's recent appraisal of the Latin American situation: "Since September 11, 2001, America's support for electoral reforms, free trade, and security in Latin America has been supplanted by the global war on terrorism and liberating Iraq. Time is running short for governments...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
Foreign Policy Analysis of the 9/11 and the U.S Invasion of Afghanistan in 2001
...across the government. However, the Afghanistan invasion has been highly associated with some level of imperialism, which has been embedded in the practice of the U.S foreign policy development (Peimani, 2003, p. 80). Besides the Al-Qaeda issue in Afghanistan, there had also been the issue of security threats posed by Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction that had been discredited. The moral debate over the use of military force against Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq begun in 2002/ the arguments behind these operations were based upon Iraq’s possession of chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction. The vice president Richard Cheney and secretary of Defence...
19 Pages(4750 words)Essay
U.S. foreign policy
...DOMINATION This chapter is being included in an attempt to establish a clear picture of US foreign policy and the influencing factors which contributed in the occurrence of the 2003 U.S.-Iraq war to further detail criticized egocentric factors like seizures of other resources, specifically oil. Discussion It is essential to understand deeper the cold-war because this is a phenomenon in which it can explain the spark of the U.S. - Iraq war in 2003. During the cold-war, Iraq had been used as a diplomatic battleground of the two opposing side which the United States viewed it as a strategic location to conquer Iran and the growing...
24 Pages(6000 words)Essay
U.S. foreign policy on Mexico
...an imperial mindset when he said, "There is one other place where our mistake in Iraq have cost us dearly - and that is the lost of our government's credibility with the American people We cannot afford to be a country of isolationists right now. 9/11 showed us that try as we might we need to maintain a strong foreign policy, relentless in pursuing our enemies and hopeful in promoting our values around the world. (Jeff Taylor, June 22, 2007). However, Obama's values indicate those of monetary benefits as most business leaders do, or as President Bush who values things even human beings based on the dollar values. Americans' values have been trumped in favor of individualism and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Evaluation of Relative imprtance of Democracy Promotion,Power Politics,and Oil in determining the U.S foreign policy towards Iraq,Saudi Arabia,and kuwait after
...Evaluation of Relative Importance of Democracy Promotion, Power Politics and Oil in Determining U.S. Foreign Policy Towards Iraq, and Saudi Arabia After 9/11 FAISAL ALMUTAIRI UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Statement of the Problem 3 Significance of the Target Countries: Iraq & Saudi Arabia 9 Significance of the Topic 12 Interest in the Topic 15 Overview of the Theoretical Perspectives 17 Oil/Economic Interests V.S Imperialism/Empire-Building 18 Realism and Power Politics, or Maintenance of Hegemony: 24 Neo-conservatism and Democracy Promotion: 29 Neoconservative V.S. Realists Debate: 33 Research...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
American Foreign Policy
...that is realized is largely as a result of compromised standards, and conflicts amongst the involved officials. There is diversification of interests amongst the parties, some of whom may have undue influence thus negatively affecting the process and wasting more time in the same. Foreign policy bureaucracy suppresses rationalism in decision making. This is again influenced by the influence of a particular department in policy formulation. A good example to this is the reason that compelled the U.S. to attack in Iraq in 2003. Just rationalism was definitely not used in the final decision making process, given the issues that erupted thereafter. This is...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
US foreign policy and Iraq
...US FOREIGN POLICY IN IRAQ US Foreign Policy in Iraq Political Goals of Iraqi Government The essential political goals set by the Iraqi administration are concerning governance and reconciliation to the changed circumstances. Some of these goals are discussed in succeeding paragraphs. (Retrieved: UN Security Council 5463rd meeting on Iraq) The first and foremost aspect is to establish good and credible governance/administration. Major effort needs to be dovetailed to build national reconciliation through dialogues and consensus between all sectarian factions. The government should gradually take full possession of all national...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic U.S. foreign policy in Iraq for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us