Engineering Ethics - Essay Example

Engineering Ethics The engineers must help in the installation of suicide prevention devices in compliance with the engineering ethics requirements. The research focuses on the ethical issues of purchasing suicide prevention devices. The research centers on the engineers’ ethical responsibility to ensure the purchase of the suicide prevention devices. Indeed, the engineers must comply with their ethical responsibility to aid in the successful installation of the suicide prevention devices. Question 1 The engineers must install suicide prevention devices to prevent or discourage suicides (Petroski). The purchase of the suicide prevention devices complies with the engineers’ ethical responsibility of holding paramount or the safety, welfare, and health of the public without discrimination. The essential engineer must persuade his fellow engineers to change the world and not study how to construct bridge, roads, skyscrapers and other infrastructures by focusing by including getting the necessary budget for the purchase and construction of the suicide prevention devices. The essential engineer must persuade his fellow engineers to change the world and not limit themselves to only studying how to construct bridge, roads, skyscrapers and other infrastructures by focusing by including getting the necessary budget for the purchase and construction of the suicide prevention devices. The installation of the suicide prevention devices is a compulsory part the engineers’ development of more safety-oriented bridges, roads, skyscrapers, and other infrastructures. The discrimination policies show that the engineers place suicide prevention devices without taking into account bias in terms of race, religion, gender, age, and physical condition of the person taking advantage of the benefits of the suicide prevention devices. The engineers must prioritize the principle of sustainable development whenever they are in the performance of their duties. Sustainable development includes the purchase and attachment of suicide prevention devices. The suicide prevention devices develop the bridges’ and the skyscrapers’ ability to reduce suicide attempts. The engineers are required to perform their daily duties with excellent competence in order to scientifically manage and maintain rapid traffic flow from reducing by onlookers observing a suicide scene. Suicide scenes normally slow down traffic. Excellent competency in this area includes the compulsory duty of going out of one’s way to ensure the approval and acquisition of the suicide safety devices. Excellent competence includes the engineers’ required task of explaining the many benefits of purchasing the suicide prevention devices to the people having the financial ability (money) to pay for the high-value suicide prevention devices. In addition, the engineers must issue statements in an objective and truthful manner; the engineers must state that the suicide prevention devices are needed for the company to prevent the further loss of lives as well as damage to property. The engineers should convince the financial sponsors of the suicide prevention devices that the high cost of the suicide prevention devices is minimal compared to preventing the continued trespassing on the property. The engineers will convince the financial sponsors that the suicide prevention devices it would less costly to buy the suicide prevention devices compared to damages that will translate to damages on the bridges and other possible high places where a person can jump off to one’s immediate death. The engineers should act in a professional manner for every employer or client and to avoid conflicts of interest. Professional manner includes informing the employer that the suicide prevention devices are compulsory equipment that will increase the use capacity of the bridges, roads, and other high buildings to reduce the suicide rate in the area. In addition, the professionalism of engineers entails the professional manner of informing the clients (general public using the bridges, high buildings, and other probable suicide venues) that the suicide prevention devices are minimum equipment that will increase the use capacity of the bridges, roads, and other high buildings to reduce the suicide rate in the area. The engineer has the moral responsibility to ensure the successful purchase and putting into place of the suicide prevention devices in all possible places of suicides. Morality entails doing well and avoiding acts that are morally bad in a given situation. The engineer shall act in a manner that shall uphold and enhance the honor, integrity, and dignity of the engineering profession. Insisting that the suicide prevention devices should be purchased complies with the engineers’ code of honor, integrity, dignity in the performance of their professional duties. Consequently, the engineers shall continually perform their professional development throughout their careers. Professional development entails research on the many advantages of purchasing and installing the suicide prevention devices. Professional development includes research on the most affordable suicide prevention devices. Likewise, the professional development includes research on the most effective suicide prevention devices. In addition, the professional development includes research on the most aesthetic suicide prevention devices. The engineers shall strive to accept opportunities for the professional development of fellow engineers under their supervision. The engineers must share their research on the most effective suicide prevention devices. Likewise, the engineers must share their research on the most affordable suicide prevention devices. In addition, the engineers must share their research on the most aesthetic suicide prevention devices. The engineers must share one’s research on the many advantages of purchasing and installing the right suicide prevention devices. The engineers must commit themselves to comply with the highest ethical and professional conduct. The highest ethical and professional conduct is grounded on prioritizing the safety of the people temporarily using the bridge, roads, skyscrapers, and other possible suicide venues. The highest ethical and professional conduct is grounded seeking the help of people or organizations to cooperate in terms of the successful purchase and installation of the suicide prevention devices. The highest ethical and professional conduct is grounded prioritizing the reduction of the suicide attempts and the corresponding successful suicides using the bridges, roads, skyscrapers, and other venues for suicide attempts. The engineers must take responsibility for all actions in relation their actions as well as inactions in areas or places where the engineer was a significant factor. The engineers must bear some of the responsibility for any suicide attempts if the engineer refused to aid in the purchase and installation of the suicide prevention devices. Similarly, the engineers must bear some of the responsibility for any successful suicide if the engineer does not help in the purchase and installation of the suicide prevention devices. The engineers must bear some of the responsibility for any damage to the bridge, road, skyscrapers, and other possible suicide venues if the engineer does not perform their share to seek the purchase and installation of the suicide prevention devices. Question 2 The suicide prevention devices cost is worth the price (minimal) when compared to the higher cost of suicide attempts as well as the higher successful suicides (Pfatteicher). The comparison shows that the engineers are traditionally justified to prioritize the public’s interest in all their professional endeavors. Such endeavors include the uncompromising purchase and installation of the suicide prevention devices. The economic aspect, reduction of cost by discarding the purchase of the suicide prevention devices, is not a major factor when compared to buying the required suicide prevention devices because the engineers must hold paramount or prioritize the safety, welfare, and health of the public without discrimination or reservation in the performance of their duties. Likewise, the reduction in both the suicide attempts and successful suicides is worth the price of purchasing and installing the suicide prevention devices. The price is not material because the engineers shall also hold paramount the protection and safekeeping of the environment in the performance of their professional duties over the cost aspect of their professional decisions. There are some ways of selling the purchase of suicide prevention devices to the taxpayers, voters, and public officials. First, the engineers shall hold explain that the public good, which is the prime duty of the government and the engineers, includes the care and respect for the environment. The environment includes the waters below the bridge, and the bridge itself. The engineers must also focus on preserving humanity’s cultural, historical, and archeological heritage. The engineers have the paramount responsibility of taking care of the safety, security, and health of the members. Question 3 Assuming the suicide rate increases, despite elaborate precautions, the researcher’s current logic, view, or professional stand on the issue of purchasing suicide prevention devices will not change (Hubbard). In terms of risk management, the engineers must keep in mind that the safety, security, and health of the people using the bridge, road, skyscrapers, and other possible suicide attempt venues is the paramount issue, other risk issues are secondary. Likewise, the protection of the environment is the engineers’ priority. The suicide attempt rate and successful suicide rate the suicide rate is only secondary compared to the environment issue. Based on the above discussion above, the engineers must aid in the successful installation suicide prevention devices in compliance with the engineering ethics requirements. The ethical issues (compulsory purchasing suicide prevention devices) must be prioritized over economic (cost –saving) construction alternatives. The traditional engineers’ ethical responsibility includes going out of their way reduce risks (including suicide risks) by convincing voters and others to help ensure the successful purchase and installation of the suicide prevention devices. Indeed, the engineers must comply with their ethical responsibility to aid in the successful installation of the suicide prevention devices. Cited Works Henry Petroski, The Essential Engineer (New York, 2010) Vintage paperback Sarah K. Pfatteicher, Lessons Amid the Rubble (Baltimore, 2010) Johns Hopkins Douglas W. Hubbard, The Failure of Risk Management (New York, 2009) John Wiley hardcover Read More