It can be said with absolute certainty that corporations, regardless of industry, have an ethical duty to fully disclose all aspects and details, both good and bad, of their products or services that they offer to their consumer bases. In fact, Immanuel Kant alluded to this, whether he realized it or not, when developing the philosophical concept of the categorical imperative…
Download file to see previous pages...
There is a fundamental belief in the free enterprise system that when it comes to marketing product, an organization must hold steadfast to the idea that it must be completely forthright about their product rather than spinning the truth about the flaws, or even dangers, of its merchandise for the sake of driving the firm’s profits. While all of the rhetoric thus far may seem rudimentary in an age where we are inundated with marketing campaigns and gimmicks, all designed to drive consumers to purchase goods and services from these entities at an alarming pace, one industry seems to have slipped through the proverbial cracks when it comes to corporate ethics, accountability, and general morality: big tobacco. Tobacco, while banned from producing TV commercials to push their particular brands, are still using highly effective marketing ploys to encourage consumers to purchase their goods, despite the lethally addictive nature of their products. Quite simply, the industry deceives its customer base to increase its profit margin by minimizing the effects of nicotine use and, in a rather brazen way, seems to pontificate that no studies have completely proven that regular tobacco consumption is ultimately fatal.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Thank You For Smoking Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1420601-thank-you-for-smoking
(Thank You For Smoking Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Thank You For Smoking Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/other/1420601-thank-you-for-smoking.
Essentially, the entire film is riddled with witty dialogues and sharp discourses, which make it stand out on its own. A film starring Aaron Eckhart, Thank You For Smoking is a movie which tackles the dangers of smoking but presents it by way of a parody or satire.
In this movie, lobbyist Nick Naylor portrays the role of an unscrupulous promoter and spin-doctor who is also the Vice-President of the Institute of Tobacco Studies. Nick tries to defend the tobacco industry against the spread of health concerns, particularly on the effects of smoking.
At the upfront, the film prominently tackles the above mentioned subjects but deep down it also portrays the relationship between a father and a son. Arguments and rhetorical analysis In one conversation between a father and a son, Naylor coaches his son Joey by telling him ‘the beauty of argument: if you argue correctly, you’re never wrong’.
NAME: COURSE: INSTRUCTORS NAME: UNIVERSITY: DATE OF SUBMISSION: CRITICAL REVIEW ESSAY The movie “Thank you for smoking” is an enthralling movie about a clever liar at his best in a completely magnificent form. The protagonist of the movie Nick Naylor believes that he has one of the most intriguing and challenging job.
Following this, there occur numerous twists and turns, which the detective solves at his own pace. These events are typical of the Hard-Boiled Style.
b. Characters: The characters in the novel are again built on the basis of the typical Hard-Boiled formulae.
He is an advocate of the rights of the smokers and cigarette manufacturers, weaving rationalities to set aside the serious dangers of the object he is advocating of. The neo-puritanical culture is condemning him for promoting cigarette smoking on media, for instance is that he gain the conformity of a young man suffering from a cancer to smoke right after his possible treatment live on a talk show.
It took him 14 months to recover from this body weight which had increased on his part. Morgan wanted to show to the world how dangerous fast food is and how detrimental an effect it has on the health regimes of the people who consume