Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1401027-discrimination
https://studentshare.org/other/1401027-discrimination.
In support, you can mention about the miscellaneous issues of harassment and discrimination at every stage of your career. I’ve every hope that you will be reinstated soon, with all the accrued service benefits. ****************************************************************************** Dear Sir/Madam: I would like to appeal against the order of my termination from services of Holmes Humphrey Regional Correctional Facility (HHRCF) on the following grounds. A: Highhanded and illegal action by my employer.
On a cursory glance at the papers that was provided to me by the authority of the Holmes Country Board of Supervisors, shortly after the hearing that was held by (MDES) on May 21, 2012 at 3.15 p.m., I saw a hand book along with the papers, supposed to be of HHRCF. I desire to state emphatically that at the time of my appointment, or during any time during my service, the handbook was never shown to me, and I have not read and understood its contents. I have not acknowledged for having received the handbook by affixing my signature and acceptance of the terms and conditions mentioned therein and as such those rules cannot be quoted or implemented to harm my interests.
Any action against me on the basis of those rules is, therefore, illegal. B: Grave miscarriage of justice through manipulated evidence: I allege that the incident supposed to have occurred on February 1, 2012 was fabricated with a pre-conceived motive to implicate me in an offence that I did not commit. How could the concerned authorities claim that I was smuggling the contraband, in the absence of lawful seizure of the same and with proper evidence? A dramatic situation was created regarding the alleged seizure of the contraband.
While conducting the search at the parking lot, I was not escorted there which was my legal privilege. I would have unlocked the car for inspection by the deputy and I would have got an opportunity to remain present during the search of my mother’s vehicle. The hidden agenda of the deputy or the authority from whom he was taking orders to implicate me was evident by the fact that on the morning of February 1, 2012 he strip-searched me and finding nothing improper in my person, he justified his action by stating that, “this is something new that we started,” and ordered me to go to work.
On the morning of Feb. 1, 2012, I was searched three times and each time the deputy searched me he found nothing. The same deputy continued with his vindictive action, again searched me while working, and breached my mother’s vehicle, without my presence and without a search warrant. This was an illegal act on the part of the deputy. The amazing sequence of events to trap me continued, I was contacted over radio to report to intake. As soon as I reported, the deputy confronted me with his unilateral findings.
The deputy was forcing me to confess something which was not there, and devoid of truth, and sensing the gross violation of my legal rights, I requested for an attorney. On Feb. 1, 2012, Sgt. Van Mayberry called me over the radio broadcasting, and he ordered me to report to intake so that I could be arrested, by the same harassing deputy. A false arrest warrant was issued for me by Holmes County on Feb. 2 2012, a day after the incident of Feb. 1, 2012. C. Legal assistance, when needed, was refused rendering me defenseless: Without tendering any argument or conceding my legal right for an attorney, he just “
...Download file to see next pages Read More