Download file to see previous pages...
We also connected and worked together, and no one dodge d his or her responsibilities and that made it easier finishing the group work within the agreed time. However, there was a weakness in that some of the members did not respond on time, which resulted in performing in a rush so as be done with the project within the due date. In addition, communication was another issue, whereby, some members like Jennifer and Carolyn always responded late on the discussion board. It changed towards the end, though, for Carolyn as she increases the number of time she communicated. Jennifer, however, never changed and always had an excuse. Another challenge is that, initially there was we had a problem with nursing diagnosis, whereby, we kept going back and forth, on which diagnosis would be correct for the patient. Eventually, we all agreed on the final diagnosis and everyone consented on the final decision. In terms of contribution, I would say that it varied although during the diagnosis it was equal. Jennifer contributed the least as she always presented excuses for not being able to carry out a task. In a future project, what I would do differently is ensuring that I have every group member’s number such that communication is improved. Further, I would ensure that we hold group meetings frequently, which possibly would make everyone more serious and effective.
During the first few classes, I assumed this course was easy and thought that it only involved the assessment of patients. However, I have come to learn that advance health assessment is very broad and requires a lot of critical thinking. It has developed me in the way I am to assess my patients which and now I am able to issue a quality patient examination. It was challenging at the beginning but through constant consultation with the professor and studying of books such as Jarvis Physical
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Peer assessment is quite important as it encourages critical thinking and innovation among students, thus, it aims to enhance the quality of learning and encourages learners (Brown & Knight, 1994). It includes student’s involvement in the prior setting of goals or criteria, final grading, and judgment, and the choice of evidence of academic success.
The order of the paragraphs is quite formal and creates an interest of the reader in the writing. However, the paper lacks the logical explanations of facts about the 9/11 and corresponding situations. Considering the length of the paper, it seems that the information on the
The author goes on to review literature related to the functions of microglia cells in iron regulation which often act as a powerful form of defense for the Central Nervous System (CNS). The conclusion sums
??s question, ‘Why is it that so many times in history the meeting of two cultures has ended in painful consequences for the less powerful?’ relates to the thesis in terms of exploring the reasons for unfavorable consequences of cultural interaction. The writer has
In the past semester, most of our tutors preferred to use peer evaluations in a bid to allow us to mingle and interact with each other. The peer assessment went a long way in fostering the unity of purpose among my peers (Pedler 2008). We enjoyed marking each other’s scripts and assigning marks to each other.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic PEER REVIEW AND SELF ASSESSMENT for FREE!