We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

12 Angry Men.A - Movie Review Example

Comments (0)
Summary
The film 12 Angry Men (1957) observes and reports on the jury system of the United States. The 18 year-old Spanish defendant draws five older gentlemen and seven middle aged men as his jury of peers. One juror is foreign born and one is from poverty. …
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
12 Angry Men.A Review
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
12 Angry Men.A

Download file to see previous pages... The jury does not assume him to be innocent, as the law prescribes. Even the judge drones his boredom during jury instructions. The many ethical dilemmas, values and concepts depicted in this film include: 1. Presumed innocence, ethic or myth? 2. Personal prejudice in the jury room. 3. Personal experience in the jury room. 4. Personal agenda in the jury room. 5. Interpersonal group dynamics: bullies, opinion leaders, bigots, conformists The film explores the best and worst in human behavior in the setting of the jury room amidst a literal life and death decision. This paper explores that treatment. Presumed Innocence Ethic or Myth Eleven of the jurors voted guilty in the first polling without the benefit of an evidence review. Only juror 81 voted not guilty. The anonymity of nameless jurors reduced audience prejudice, although, juror 8 wore a white suit and juror 32 wore a black suit in keeping with Hollywood symbolism. Juror 8 stood alone in his conviction, his ethic, that before sending a defendant to the death penalty, the jury had a duty to review the case. Several of the jurors commented they thought the defendant was guilty from early in the case, indicating an early personal deliberation without listening to the defense first. Juror 23 says he cannot put his reasons into words, just thought the defendant “guilty from the word go”. (Lumet 1957) Juror 64 says he was “convinced early” (Lumet 1957) when the prosecutor established motive. Juror 75 exclaims “no one thought about it twice” (Lumet 1957) except juror 8. Clearly, these jurors did not honor their commitment to impartiality prior to deliberations. Although the defense attorney did not aggressively cross examine witnesses, most jurors felt the defense council was competent, mostly by assumption. The assumption of competency logically lead to the conclusion that if there were a defense, it would have been presented. No defense, no rebuttal, no innocence. The defense council is never on screen, a cinematic no show. The fact that the boy was accused of killing his father, a man whose position was sympathetic to many on the jury, ironically foreshadowed the juror 8 role in this drama. (Cunningham 1986) Juror 3 said his parenting skills involved “making his son a man” (Lumet 1957) until his son punched him in the jaw during an argument. Juror 8 raised his kids through love and respect. Juror 8 saw in the defendant an innocent child that never had a chance while the others only saw his superficial guilt. The movie continued through the first act with only juror 8 assuming the defendant was not guilty. The others were too emotional or prejudiced to review the facts. The first act ends with juror 8 making a leap of faith. He challenges the others to make a secret ballot and if all 11 vote guilty, he will too. The votes are counted and a 10-1 split is discovered. The older gentleman, juror 96, decided to back up juror 8 on principle; although ten jurors did not presume innocence, the young defendant would receive thoughtful deliberation from his jury. Personal Prejudice The jurors demonstrated a varying degree of prejudice, both racial and class based. As the jurors entered the jury room, several conversations revolved around the defendant and his social status. The discussion of evidence brought to light the prejudice and backstory7 of the jurors. In a more benign comment, Juror 48 avers the defendant came from the slums and slums create criminals. “Everyone knows that” (Lumet 1957). Juror 59 disagrees with this assessment, reviewing his own history and asking for sensitivity to the youth’s plight. Juror 1010 is a more vehement bigot, spewing stereotype and cursing “ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
12 Angry men: The role of Ethics
12 Angry Men: The Role of Ethics The movie, 12 Angry Men , follows the murder trial of a teenaged Hispanic boy who is being tried for the murder of his father and focuses on the juries deliberation of the case. The boy has little in the way of an alibi, and all circumstantial evidence agrees with him being the killer.
3 Pages(750 words)Movie Review
12 Years A Slave
The film 12 years A Slave uses Christianity and various racist pathologies to reveal the extent of slavery among the capitalistic society. Slave masters in the Antebellum South are portrayed as God-fearing as they use the bible to justify the various institutions they belong to.
2 Pages(500 words)Movie Review
Twelve Angry Men: Factors in Decision
Skills in leadership are applicable to many aspects. In a certain group, it is natural for one to stand out as a leader, but not necessarily to lead. Many people are mistaken by defining leadership as only a position and not seeing the importance that the result effective leadership could create.
4 Pages(1000 words)Movie Review
Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men
Juror 8, is one of twelve men, each coming from different backgrounds, careers, prejudices and beliefs, asked to judge one of their peers. The defendant is an 18-year old kid who allegedly has killed his father with a switchblade knife, in a heated fight.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
12 angry men movie
It is the duty of the jury to come up with a unanimous decision whether to acquit or convict the Hispanic. The movie is famous for the use of a single set. The entire movie was filmed in a single jury room with the exception of three
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
12 Angry Men - Movie Review
The movie is a depiction of how jury decides the verdict and despite all the facts they can easily be blinded by the prejudices resulting in the flawed logical reasoning by them as happened in this case.
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment
Review
As a large number of people live in the form of married couples, the analysis of how husbands and wives separate their roles become essential. Along with analyzing heterosexual couples, the
6 Pages(1500 words)Movie Review
12 angry men
He does this by successfully convincing the other 11 members of the jury to buy his idea of “burden of proof” concerning the evidence presented against the accused. The defendant is accused of having murdered his vicious father. When the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
12 Angry Men
The characteristics of group dynamics applicable to this case include personality conflicts, the operation of the jurors’ minds and their joint effort in determining the truth. The movie represents an entire spectrum of humanity, from the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
12 Angry Men (Movie)
The same is the case in the film as the twelve jurors make their decision by systematically changing their belief on the guilt of the defender. Eleven of them decide that the boy is guilty without considering any of the evident effectively. They do so owing to the
5 Pages(1250 words)Movie Review
Let us find you another Movie Review on topic 12 Angry Men.A Review for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us