Comment on the powerpoint of caregiver challanges r /e end of life in geriateric population - Essay Example

Geriatric Patient Status and goals of care: Article Critique Geriatric Patient Status and goals of care: Article Critique IntroductionThe article sought to explore the barriers underlying the communication of the providers and patients pertaining to the geriatric patient’s code status and care goals; identify the appropriate practices that are optimal for communication between the providers and the patients and provide resources for the providers and patients to foster communication. What was done better?

The article does well in pointing out the problems that constrain exercising of the patient code status and the care goals. The constraints that the article highlights are what can be encountered in real life practices and have even been well documented in literature, for instance, (Kaldjian & Broderick, 2011; Kaldjian et al., 2009). One of the impediments is limited knowledge on how the care goals and code status should be treated. The parties concerned are often torn between opposing interests and concerns, so that, in the end, decisions that are made happen to be totally out of line with what was considered appropriate.

It is also factual that is often exacerbated by the fact the condition of the elderly people make it difficult for them to declare their stand regarding their wishes. The strength of the article further extended to how these problems could be effectively resolved. Here, what emerges to be the strongest point is the suggestion to adopt a collaborative approach. A collaborative approach is now gaining popularity in effectively addressing the needs of the vulnerable groups such as the disabled. It is through the collaborative approach that the individual needs of the disabled people have been identified and taken care.

In this regard, it is expected that a similar approach in the geriatrics would serve a similar purpose. What additional information may be included?In exploring additional information that may need to be included, the leading question is whether all the provide information is adequate in ensuring that the needs of the elderly patients are effectively addressed. One point that can be raised pertains to the question of who is supposed to the custodian of the dying wishes, as well as who is to heard or ignored between the concerned parties.

There is the need to offer additional, exhaustive information on how such difficulties could be overcome and these questions are particularly central to the geriatric dilemma. In my view, such challenges are particularly profound that they can only be addressed exhaustively, including proposing an inclusive legal framework. ReferencesKaldjian, L. C., & Broderick, A. (2011). Developing a policy for do not resuscitate orders within a framework of goals of care. The Joint Commission Journal of Quality and Patient Safety, 37(1), 11-20.

Kaldjian, L. et al. (2009). Code status discussions and goals of care among hospitalized adults. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 338-342.