Asthma Programs in Australia - Essay Example

Triggered in November 2009, the program is advantageous for training more than 148 104 staff in schools and preschools providing 7 514 1 hour Asthma Australia training sessions across Australia (Asthma Australia, 2011). Thus, the program is aimed at making education staff aware of the problem itself and the safety options required for keeping up a good job with children with asthma accordingly. Moreover, it is valuable in a hospital setting, involving children in a friendly atmosphere of understanding and counseling on the part of adults. Moreover, keeping in mind the fact that the rate of asthma prevalence in Australia is one of the highest in the world, the annual costs vary from $500 million to $1 billion (Mulberg, Silber, & Anker, 2010, p. 25). ACAP is seen to have the largest amount of funding on the part of the government. Nevertheless, it needs more inclusion of additional directions aimed at the optimization of ACAP’s mission throughout different states in Australia.

ACSP is another program included in the national program on community and hospital admission of asthma training to increase people’s awareness of the diseases while decreasing cases of emergency in the future. The program deals with both community and hospital awareness and is based on education, information, and support (Asthma Australia, 2011). In this respect, the program is effective due to its widespread popularity and a host of positive feedback from all participants engaged in this program.

The question is that ACSP is called to prevent Australians with asthma from lethal outcomes. It is all about the conclusions made by the Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring state that from 2000 to 2005, there were 145 deaths per 100,000 patients with the highest rate of mortality among patients over 45 years old (Watson, Pharma, & Rabe, 2007). Thus, commenced in response to such poor statistics in November 2009, ACSP provides the hospital staff along with the rest of the population with proper training and assessment regarding asthma. To say more, 511 sessions were realized in the last year (Asthma Australia, 2011). However, the program lacks impact on the western states of Australia having less performance there.

Finally, AAP is the oldest health-promoting anti-asthma program commenced in Australia at the end of the 1980s to timely analyze and define the detrimental factors for and preventive measures against asthma. In this respect, the first two programs seem to repeat the methods prescribed by AAP. It is all about the main benefits of AAP for Australians realized through the awareness of the symptoms, seeking medical attention, resources for better management of asthma, training community members with what they can do in cases of asthmatic manifestations in an individual, etc (Harver & Kotses, 2008). What is more, the program is beneficial due to the increase in self-report asthma prevalence since it was commenced (Harver & Kotses, 2008). It is a crucial shift in assessing widespread training of people in of treatment of asthma. This program is at the core of governmental financing, but it seems to have more innovations for even larger information coverage across Australia.

Therefore, the three programs under discussion have shown their relevant use for achieving better results in community and hospital admission of asthma throughout Australia. Hence, the promotion of asthma-related programs in Australia is a serious push on people’s behaviors of asthma and people with asthma nationwide.