Nobody downloaded yet

Elements of reasoning and intellectual standards - Coursework Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
A good article needs to portray the elements of reasoning. These elements include the purpose for writing that information. Purpose may be used to give the reasons why the information is given to the…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.5% of users find it useful
Elements of reasoning and intellectual standards
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Elements of reasoning and intellectual standards"

Download file to see previous pages The problem arising is that the president failed to visit the flood torn area in the boarder where many children got affected. The information should be from a credible source. In this article, Perry was quoted in a CNN interview saying that the American people expect to see their President when there is a disaster and that president Obama showed up in Sandy and not in Texas (Cohen, Payne, & Ford, 2014). This information is credible as it is given to the global news caster.
The news article should also highlight the concept or the way the event is supposed to be approached at a given time. The concept here is that the American president needs to have a close attachment with the people and therefore he should have been with the children in the flood area. The clash arose when the president said that going to a crisis area is only meant for a photo shot implying that there is no need of moving to the area. This attributes of the president have been likened with the acts of the former president George W. Bush who decided not to visit the Gulf coast when it was affected by the storm Hurricane Katrina in 2005. He opted to fly with the Air Force One hence got a lot of criticism from the public for detaching himself from the victims (Cohen, Payne, & Ford, 2014). It is recommended that the president should at least send some representatives than being silent or even criticizing that event for doing so he may be portrayed as if he is not concerned with the people.
The article should portray fairness in its way of representation meaning that the editors should be fair in their news release. The intellectual standards have been used as we can see the involved actors are responding to criticism. The governors state their criticism about the event and the president states his view on how he thinks is supposed to happen.
In my own opinion, I think the article is biased because the criticism towards the president does not ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Elements of reasoning and intellectual standards Coursework”, n.d.)
Elements of reasoning and intellectual standards Coursework. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1652274-elements-of-reasoning-and-intellectual-standards
(Elements of Reasoning and Intellectual Standards Coursework)
Elements of Reasoning and Intellectual Standards Coursework. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1652274-elements-of-reasoning-and-intellectual-standards.
“Elements of Reasoning and Intellectual Standards Coursework”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1652274-elements-of-reasoning-and-intellectual-standards.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning
...? Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning Your al affiliation More Shame by Cedar Rapids The Roman Catholic hierarchyin this country has promised accountability and justice for children sexually abused by priests. (2)We fear it has a long way to go. (3)A new inquiry has found that nearly a decade after the scandal engulfed the American church, children are still in peril (4) and some leaders are still stonewalling investigations. A grand-jury report released Feb. 10 accused three priests and a teacher in the Philadelphia Archdiocese of raping two young boys in the 1990s. It also accused a senior church official of knowingly endangering thousands of children by shielding accused priests for years. The...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Associational reasoning
...? The main issue that we are concerned is whether associational reasoning is good or bad for the society as a whole. Associational reasoning can be described as way of thinking where one associates or connects events and phenomena, which no one else had even noticed before. Marshall Mcluhan, Walter Ong, Innis and many other scholars have been associated with this type of reasoning. Ong has written a book Orality and Literacy where he redefined the works of Marshall in a more precise form. Ong has clearly supported Mcluhan’s way of thinking and he himself used associational reasoning to explain his theories. Associational reasoning is definitely a good way...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Philosophical reasoning
...Two women have built profound philosophies on the of feminism. They have both taken a journey into reasoning and logic that few people ever truly go on in search of the realities of life. Simone de Beauvoir and Christina Sommers both raise interesting points and arguments, both making clear what equity really refers to and the differences that exist between men and women. Comparing and contrasting Beauvoir's "The Second Sex" and Sommers' "Who Stole Feminism" on their philosophical reasoning on the subject at hand has the ability to enlighten the philosophical mind joining them on their journeys. Both Beauvoir and Sommers address the issue of feminism from a systematic or topical method in which they...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Inductive Reasoning
..., the relevant normative system is formal logic. Participants are given some premises and asked whether a conclusion follows. Under strict deductive reasoning instructions, they are told (a) to assume that the premises are true and (b) to draw or approve only conclusions that necessarily follow. As observed elsewhere (Evans, 2002), this widely used method was developed over 40 years ago when belief in logic as a normative and descriptive system for human reasoning was very much higher than it is today. In spite f the method, much evidence has emerged to support the conclusion that pragmatic factors play a large part in human reasoning. We say "in spite of" because...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Algebraic Reasoning
...and teaching style. Furthermore, the teacher will assign exercise sets from the textbook, which must be submitted on the next meeting. "Algebraic Reasoning" Subject 5 - Advance Methods of Solving Algebraic Equations 2 What is the lesson objective The main motive of this lesson is to assess the extent which the students can do unguided learning. For this day, the students must learn synthetic division. Standards addressed and expectations of students: Anticipatory Set: For creating interest, the teacher will emphasize the difficulty of regular division in simplifying algebraic expressions and equations. He will pose problems that would normally take much time, but will be easier to solved using...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Quantative reasoning
...of dispersion chosen for this problem is Standard deviation. This provides for the possible dispersion for each of the groups. Group A = 9.44 Group B = 22.01 Group A: To calculate the standard deviation of Group A, firstly the difference of the values and the mean is calculated, after which these numbers are squared. The total of the squares are then calculated and then divided by the number of values to provide the Variance. The last step is to take the square root of the variance. This provides the standard deviation for the group. Below are the calculations for Group...
2 Pages(500 words)Speech or Presentation
Quantitative Reasoning
...Quantitative Reasoning Table of Contents Descriptive Analysis 3 Central Tendency 3 Measures of Dispersion 3 Bivariate Correlation Coefficient 4 Two-sample Student’s t-test 5 References 8 Cohen, J. (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd Edition). London, UK: Routledge. 8 Gravetter, F. J. & Wallnau, L. B. (2009) Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. USA: Cengage. 8 Healey, J. F. (2009) The Essentials of Statistics: A Tool for Social Research. USA: Cengage. 8 Healey, J. F. & Prus, S. G. (2009) Statistics: A Tool for Social Research. USA: Cengage. 8 Reinard, J. C. (2006) Communication research statistics. London, UK: Sage. 8 Woodbury, G. (2001) An Introduction to Statistics....
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Ethical Reasoning
...Ethical reasoning College There are basically three types of ethical reasoning, ly: deductive, abductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is a method of a applying or using a general rule in specified situations whereby conclusions can be predicted. Inductive reasoning is a form o logistic reasoning in specified situations where conclusions are generalized. However, the accuracy of the conclusions in inductive reasoning is doubtable and thus it is a risky form type of logical thinking. This form of reasoning is commonly used in philology and applied mostly in physics. Lastly, is abductive...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Diagnostic Reasoning
...Diagnostic Reasoning Medical decision-making models focus on analytical reasoning. In order to come up with superior diagnostic and curative decisions, the models utilize Bayes’ theorem, thresholds and decision trees. These arithmetical models integrate medical epidemiological data. They are also associated with evidence-based medicine and standard for superior practice. The conclusive statement made in the article that medical decision-making doctors have to establish a balance between diagnostic reasoning and a kind of intuitive appraisal is true. The use of diagnostic methods alone does not always guarantee the expected results. Even though clinicians can use data...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Critical reasoning
...Critical Reasoning: Logic Part 1. An argument with true premises and true conclusion that is valid. First Premise: All normal human beings are rational. Second Premise: Peter is a normal human being. Conclusion: Peter, therefore, is rational. 2. An argument with false premises, and true conclusion that is valid. First Premise: All the animals that belong to the family of cats are carnivorous Second Premise: snakes belong to the family of cats Conclusion: Therefore, snakes are carnivorous. 3. An argument with false premises, true conclusion and is invalid. First Premise: all the current football stars in the world are Chinese Second Premise: Lionel Messi is an American Conclusion: Lionel Messi, therefore, is a football...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Coursework on topic Elements of reasoning and intellectual standards for FREE!
Contact Us