Islamic Politics - Essay Example

Reviewing the past and evaluating the present, the world could at any moment choose the comfort of avoiding concern about global crises where politics, culture, and economy play vital functions that are often manipulated by the power bearers, especially during the war between nations. These are issues that appear too complicated to handle but the complexity of studying the Islamic perspective on war and peace seems just as exhausting to comprehend that it occasionally loses appeal and makes large peace-making bodies dissipate a great deal of hope in the process. Through the discourse of IMAM Dr. Abdul Jalil Sajid via the written work “Islam and Ethics of War and Peace”, the political theory of Islam on justice, war, and peace is based on the core teaching of Qur’an stating “The aim of war according to the Qur’an is not to propagate or spread Islam, nor is it to expand the territory of the Islamic State or dominate, politically or militarily, non-Muslim regions.” In order to gain deeper insight into war and peace under the context of Islamic principles, it would be useful to investigate the empirical findings of Jeff Haynes in view of religious fundamentalism, the article “Understanding Islam”, S.P. Huntington on the “clash of civilizations”, as well as the report made by Diane Sawyer.

Besides the conventional notion that religious fundamentalism pertains to a religious movement whose militant characteristic is justified by stiff adherence to fundamental principles, Jeff Haynes modifies the basic definition by critiquing that contemporary religious fundamentalism emerges out of ‘the failed promise of modernity’ and necessarily refutes the negative impact of modernization upon moral development. According to Haynes, the religious militancy in fundamentalism is chiefly brought about by the general ‘decline of the societal salience of religion’ due to rapid cultural and economic changes, particularly since World War II. Normally, religious authorities are ideally expected to intervene in state affairs when advancing political interests so that the goals set herein can be directed to coincide with the public good or applied to satisfy the needs and desires of the majority. This way, religion serves to oppose secularism and mediate between the government and the people in order to ensure that the concerns of the latter are met within the constitutional framework and may be understood as the principal grounds behind the 9-11 incident of 2001.

Muslims are typically found in a state of yearning to convey their cultural beliefs humbly and profoundly, especially to people who either fear or mistrust them due to the overall appearance made by the black suit. As Asghar Bukhari confessed via “Understanding Islam” where he said “Muslims are very fearful, frustrated, upset, angry”, it is readily perceivable that the face-veil issue originates from the fact that there exists a number of huge differences between Christianity and Islam where Christianity is widely accepted over Islam despite the exceeding diligence of Muslims in promoting the essence of religion in all aspects of living. The head of the Muslim World League expressed contempt against bombings and violent attacks by terrorists and somehow this provides relief to the misconception that Islamic activities generally support and tolerate inhumane forms of political retaliation.