Download file to see previous pages...
These movies need close introspection and a thorough cognition would definitely enable us to deep delve into some of the important socio-economic and cultural discourse of the time with a good taste of aesthetic operating throughout the film.
Comparison of two films occurs from some mutual paradigm. Portrait of Teresa by Pastor Vega and Salt of the Earth by Herbert J. Biberman both the films are contemporary and are based on contemporary socio-economic issue of a similar geographical terrain. Both the films encapsulate a strong feminist discourse and centres round the deconstruction of archetypal stereotype traditional and conventional role of woman in society.
Portrait of Teresa directed by Pastor Vega was released in the year 1979 and apparently seems a trajectory of women with much dramatic presentation. But the language of camera pushes its limit beyond the initial portrayal of Teresa overwhelmed with her family which comprise of her husband Ramon and three children and her job as a crew leader in the textile factory to a realm where she moves beyond the ordinary role of a household woman trying to seek the attention of her husband and becoming expert in mere domestic duties to a revolutionary and a dominant motivating factor in labour movement (The Internet Movie Database, “Retrato de Teresa (1979)”).
Teresa moves beyond the parameters of odd jobs and dirty dishes and her husband failing to accept her in the new role get separated and start an affair. When her husband wishes to reconcile, Teresa asks him what if during the time of separation she also had an affair. Block-headed Ramon fails to pass Teresa’s test with his chauvinist reply “But men are different” and with if he loses Teresa forever who with her head held high in self-esteem courageously wishes to move beyond the limits of an ordinary woman performing only her household duties (Rich, “Portrait of Teresa Double Day, Double Standards”).
On the other hand, the film Salt of the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
having Mexican origin (Arturo, pp. 20-28). This term was unfamiliar until the last few decades, which came into prominence after 1960s. People of Chicano culture were trade into America as low-priced labors with the agreement of the American and Mexican governments.
Though such discussions seem primarily common now than before, the search for development among individual nations actually started long before today. Undoubtedly, nations like America, Britain, Germany and France who could be referred to as developmental giants without much controversy started embarking on the journey unto developmental achievement long before now.
The second part of the XX century became the epoch of essential renovation of historical science in the USA. The development of American historiography was ambiguous, and the attempts of representative use of historical knowledge in policy were not unsuccessful.
The socio-cultural turmoil among Latin American nations, lives of common people, their dilemma and problems of Revolution (1911-19) were used by the Western directors; compared to that the Latin American film industry remained almost passive
r films cannot depend on costly visual or special effects, sounds, and the other types of ‘whizbang’ that generally characterize Hollywood movies (Noriega 2000). Latin American directors should be ingenious and practical, and numerous times they construct an absorbingly
people from the atrocities that were taking place within its borders and to unite them to face an external threat – the British, as the Argentinean government moved to exert territorial rights over the Falkland islands which was under British rule. The film story of
The Mexican Americans over the past years have experienced difficult in identifying themselves mainly because of their history, which poses ambiguity.
The Mexicans after the Americans colonized them were