Download file to see previous pages...
Looking into the history of the US trading market there are a number of individuals whose reputation has span over years while others have popped into the market lately and made it big within a short time span. Making it big in this respect is related to how much one has made or makes in trading deals and the factors that surround their continued successes in making the right choices, deals and bets for that matter. Two characters are to be discussed and offered as examples in supporting the view that talent is the one that matters not hard work.
Ken Griffin is the first one to consider and he is the Managing Director/CEO of Citadel Investment Group (Traderslog 2008). Considering its large size, it is important to study a few trends of its CEO. He started trading stock options and funds in his college days. Later developed the fund mentioned above with 4.2 million dollars (Traderslog 2008). Today it stands to be the one of the largest in the world with current management portfolio of 13 billion dollars.
John Arnold is the other trader whose mastery of his business is given credit by a cross-section of huge and reputed players (Demon 2009). Taking his background for instance in Enron as a trader it is clear that his fortunes in this line of business were destined for success after scooping over 750 million dollars for the company. He was handsomely rewarded with 8 million dollars bonus. He used the bonus to start his own hedge fund by the name Centaurus Advisors, LLC. Soon he was making billion dollar bets in energy related trading and to the surprise of many he trades few times a year in the most awkward moments of the market. Last year he made slightly less than a billion dollars. In the few times he has spoken he says that he buys things at the time when they are below fair value and sell when he believes they are way above it according to Demon (2009). This simple concept relies more on talent i.e. his innate understanding of concepts
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Reardon (2006) in her book, It’s all politics; Winning in a World Where Hard Work and Talent Aren’t Enough, argues that the world we live in today is very much competitive. Therefore, it is very hard for anyone to get what he/she expects despite his or her talents or how hard they work.
Television talent shows –in many cases – have performed their roles in transforming the face of music industry – with some adding value and others damaging the industry. The discussion will explore opposing viewpoints in relation to the role of X factor television show in the British music industry.
Individual may have talent for dancing, music, sport or other activities. If some individuals have the talents they still have to work very hard for achieving success or for successful outcome in their personal and professional life. A talented person is considered as the gifted person who can guide other individuals towards success through sheer talent.
The intense competition that characterizes today’s business world necessitates that organizations strategically place themselves to optimize project success by capitalizing on the human resources available to them and therefore reducing on wastage (Vaiman, Scullion and Collings, 2012).
The latest concept is that of employer branding. Literature from various academic sources has been reviewed and it has been found that this new concept is nothing but a new name to the old practices. The HRM practice
lues within the organization, (2) it can enhance the corporate reputation of the organization, (3) it can help in the development of innovative and creative ideas among employees, (4) it can improve the outcome of labor shortages, and (5) it can help to attract and retain
Every person is able to achieve good results in a certain sphere in case one works hard; it is a talent, however, that makes a person a real specialist in that branch. Therefore, talent, which is both a special ability and hard work,
This paper shall look at factors that motivate employees to work hard, and it shall explore the various motivational theories. According to the economist’s utility model of individual behavior, an employee shall adopt that behavior that he expects to give him the greatest utility. Each employee shall demonstrate a behavior, which shall have both positive and negative consequences.