Gender-Based Discrimination and Human Rights Law - Thesis Proposal Example

The fact is that gender-discrimination law in different countries and societies reveals severe discrepancies and thus makes it difficult to resolve gender discrimination issues at the global level. For example, ECHR and EU primary and secondary provisions differ greatly in the scope and meaning and thus make it difficult to develop minimum standards of human dignity protection (Besson 648). Numerous cases of gender discrimination (e.g., the recent case of gender discrimination in Wall Street firms – Legal Info) create a controversial environment, in which resolving gender discrimination controversies is virtually impossible. This paper will hypothesize that the development of single, universal, human rights standards will reduce the existing legal discrepancies within the gender discrimination legal discourse and will, as a result, provide better conditions for addressing gender discrimination issues in different cultural contexts.

For the purpose of the current research, qualitative research methodology will be used. One of the aims of the current research is to investigate the current state of human rights law and its relation to gender discrimination. Another goal is to analyze the existing legal discrepancies and their impact on the quality and effectiveness of resolving gender discrimination disputes in courts. This research will seek to analyze the results and consequences of the subsequent legal standardization and its influence on gender discrimination cases (both quantitatively and qualitatively).

The current research will involve the benefits of qualitative interviewing. Legal professionals in human rights law from different countries and cultures will be asked to participate in the research. Qualitative interviews will be designed to analyze professional opinions about the current legal discrepancies and the need to reduce them. Legal professionals will be asked to evaluate the potential impact of legal standardization on the consistency and effectiveness of gender discrimination litigation and resolution. The results of interviews will be analyzed qualitatively and will serve as the foundation for analyzing the future of human rights law and its role in gender discrimination. Qualitative interviews will also be used to define the concept of harmful cultural practices and to analyze professional opinions about them. The researcher assumes that reducing human rights law discrepancies is impossible without having and operating a single definition of harmful cultural practices.

The researcher expects that the results of the current study will become the basis for the subsequent, more profound analysis of gender discrimination issues in different legal contexts. It is important that legal professionals have a detailed understanding of the legal discrepancies and their impact on the state of gender discrimination and harmful cultural practices. The analysis of these discrepancies goes beyond the scope of the discussed research. The researcher must be aware of difficulties and controversies in the modern understanding of gender discrimination and harmful cultural practices and must account for the subjective cultural experiences which may exert their influence on the research participants’ understanding and interpretation of the human rights law.