Download file to see previous pages...
Even though it is said that Colonialism involves the colonization of a country of dark skinned people by a lighter-skinned people, it is not so always. We also come across different countries being subjected to slavery by people of the same origin (Issues of race and imperialism). The world has gone through these stages of development and each stage has left its mark on the face of earth. While we study development or human development, a basic knowledge of these words and the process are necessary to understand their influence on the difference between nation state.
To consider and understand the influence of development we should strive to understand about nation states, how individual nation states were formed and how the world developed to its present form. We can use the term ‘development’ to trace the formation of the world order till the end of twentieth century and then turn to ‘human development’, which was a term used only by the end of twentieth century (Coopper.1999).
The development of a nation is a very complex multi-faceted notion. It is a much broader concept than income and national GDP. The rate of growth of income of individuals, especially the common working class can be considered as a judge of progress of economies over time. It includes what people with diverse and broad expectations, of the “good life” that each society envisages for itself. Even though the concept includes growth of income level and economic growth, it can go well beyond these as well. The changes should not only be on the large scale it should also involve whole scale social and economy wide transformations (Haq.2009).
The order in the modern world is established by nation states. States are the law makers; they make sure that these are observed and breaking of the law is also the concern of the State. Markets are under the control of states, currency is managed and its value is controlled by the State in both
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In Chapter 8 of this book the author deals with the problem of racism/racialism in the doctrine and practice of British policies with regard to the non-white colonial populations. The aim of this paper is to review the argument advanced by Johnson (2003) and to present my own conclusions about the subject in question.
The most important European governments have decided that their political and international programs must to extend their hegemony to other countries. Africa and India was two of some continents who suffered the European invasion. After 1871 year, were happened important historical phenomena that have changed the life of America country.
The concept of race and its definition has been discussed in the first passage of the article titled Origins of the Race Concept (Winant, 172). The subject of race has always been a controversial sociological subject because there have been major disagreements among scholars regarding the precise meaning of the concept of “race”.
For him, the real estate investors, the oil companies, and many companies were busy exploiting the rest of the society and there was need to protect the society against this. For many, the industrial revolution would eventually be strong enough to ensure that the benefits were actually well distributed in the society.
Although various laws have been abolished and enacted over the years to eliminate racism in the country against people of all races, the social evil continues to plague the nation even today. The domestic and foreign policies of United States are rooted in the country’s history which is riddled with racial inequality, gross misappropriation of social justice, and devoid of any ideals which are today, granted to all human beings - that of liberty, equality, justice and most of all human dignity.
In fact, some women became leading propagandists of the Empire. A name that comes across as an example for this category is that of Flora Shaw (first colonial Editor, Times, 1890-1900), who believed in white superiority and held a masculinist view of the empire.
On the other hand, any planning approach which depends rather exclusively on fiscal or pure economic policies from the top eventually finds itself mired in a cycle of underdevelopment, or gross economic growth without equitable human development.
This is an indication that the decision by the European nations to colonize Africa was not right (Bush 17).
Leaders who planned on how to occupy Africa had no aim of developing the continent in their mind. Instead,
It is possible through annexation, infiltration, war, military conquest, and political pressure. Once the territory conquered, it becomes a colony of the conquering nation, sometimes benevolently denoted to as “mother country.” Therefore,
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Imperialism,'Race' and Development for FREE!