Download file to see previous pages...
The U.S. foreign policy is thus energy driven and security driven and these factors are integrated to exhibit the American dominance over the world (Bromley, S 2005 p.225 - 227). ‘Blood for oil’ is the term coined by social and political analysts to explain the overt actions of the United States to secure the oil fields in the Middle East.
Michael Klare critises the national security policy of United States in Blood and oil. The author argues that the military and foreign policy of US has been driven by the need to ensure a safe method to source foreign oil specifically from the Middle East. Dependence on oil from foreign sources is continuously gowing and the US forces are deemed to fight to secure oil producing nations and supply routes.
It is further argued that even if the United States diversifies its foreign oil supply sources, there is very less probability that the dependence on Gulf oil would reduce and the diversifiication of sources may increase the probablities of American involvement in conflict in other parts of the world. In the race to secure major shares of oil from other competitive nations, the U.S. is also highly probable to engage in war with China and Russia.
Klare concludes by suggesting methods to reduce the costs involved for oil dependence that comes in the way of war and disharmony. The alternative methods suggested include a better national energy strategy of integrity and autonomy that detaches its method to secure energy from security obligations to governments abroad, reduction of oil consumption and to speed up methods to develop alternative energy sources. In short, Klare critices the foreign policy of U.S. that brings in consequences that are much underappreciated (Klare,M 2004).
The national interest of United States is to remove any encumbrances or obstacles that obstruct the Americans in their pursuit for a better living and happiness. In
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
standing in the world1 The 9/11 world trade centre attack by Bin laden and his allies made immense changes in the foreign policies of Untied States. President George Bush made drastic changes in America’s foreign policies and claimed that these changes in foreign policies are essential to safeguard the interests and security of the American public.
U.S. Foreign Policy and Trade
Has the implementation of NAFTA led to the U.S. being restricted in the foreign policy realm or was NAFTA part of the broader foreign policy objectives of the United States? What generalizations can be made between U.S. foreign policy and trade?
US Post Cold War Interventionism Foreign Policy
The interventionism foreign policy that United States adopted in the post Cold War era has left the country and citizens more insecure than ever before.
The country has spent billions of dollars, which unfortunately has not translated into tangible sense of security for American interests within and outside the country’s borders.
The armed conflict was divided into two phases, the first starting on 20th March, 2003 marked by the US invasion of Ba'athist Iraq (Hinnebusch, 2006). The second phase was marked with prolonged confrontation leading to emergence of rebel group fighting against coalition forces headed by the United States and the new Iraqi government after the dethroning of former Iraq president Saddam Hussein.
Thus, the United States formulates its foreign policies in a way that will keep its fundamental interests like protecting its Cold War allies and maintaining its commercial ties with oil producing allies. This research paper is designed in such a way that it bring together fundamental approach and enquiry into the way the US adjusts its foreign policy system to maintain its interests in periods where there is a risk of major oil price hikes.
and terrorist groups(Talbott and Chanda,2001;Chomsky,2002;Wolin,2002).The United States foreign policy could no longer simply address state actors and disregard non state actors; it could no longer support , or turn a blind eyes towards , oppressive, authoritarian and
According to the author of the response, the US has a large stake in providing such kind of assistance to Yemen not because the US is a Good Samaritan, but because of the interest, it has in the AQAP, which is associated with Yemen. Besides, with the abundance of the military armor of the use, it fights the AQAP through the naval and air strikes.
Russia still perceives itself as a powerful nation and has often used its power to portray its identity across the globe1. The country has made use of its great power identity projection through the utilization of energy
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Is US foreign policy driven by oil for FREE!