Download file to see previous pages...
The multitude of assessment tools, on the one hand, presents medical professionals with a unique opportunity to choose and use the tools that fit their needs and the needs of their patients. On the other hand, the multiplicity of tools creates conditions, in which variations in wound care practices may work against the principles of effective monitoring and measurement of ulcer healing. The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) and the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT/ PSST) are the two most popular assessment tools in wound care, but it is more important and even interesting to reconsider the validity and reliability (if possible) of other wound assessment instruments. This paper will seek to evaluate and investigate the reliability and validity of the Sussman Wound Healing Tool (SWHT).
Pressure ulcers or pressure sores present a ‘chronic problem of debilitated elders who are mainly bed or chair bound or unable to reposition themselves. The pressure ulcer is a localized area of tissue necrosis that develops when soft tissue is compressed against a bony prominence and an external surface for a long period of time” (Ebersole, Hess & Luggen 2004, p. 144). Pressure ulcers are usually the results of pressure, skin breakdown, maceration, or shearing (Baranoski & Ayello 2003; Ebersole, Hess & Luggen 2004). They can range from simple reddening to severe craters with exposed bone or muscle (Bluestein & Javaheri 2008). They are staged in four different categories: stage I can heal rapidly; stage II is treated effectively if patients avoid pressure and other risk factors; stage III requires using antiinfective agents and sometimes enzymatic debridement, whilst stage IV is associated with large and deep ulcers that often require surgical debridement of the necrotic tissue (Bates-Jensen et al 2003; Coleman et al 2002; Ebersole, Hess & Luggen, 2004). Given the importance of wound healing in different groups of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
What concerns would you have in applying each of these instruments for research in a new population? How would you address these concerns if you were to use either of these instruments in research? (500 words) There are two concepts which will be analyzed here comparing and contrasting the confirmatory factors of validity and reliability between two articles.
Human services research, like every other research, is based on a set of propositions and concepts. In order to operationally define concepts we need to measure them. The process of measurement begins with the fundamental question “What has to be measured?
The paper is aimed to define and to discuss the concepts of reliability and validity in the research process. These concepts are considered statistically significant in proving data in research to be able to be accepted as scientific truth. Reliability defines the high level of trust on the recorded data thus can be repeated and replicated.
To work with today’s complex healthcare environment, nurses need to be efficient and effective. Employers today demand a high level of competency and skills. Nursing is a holistic process that includes not only the physical or psychological aspects but also socio-cultural, environmental, and economic elements of treatment.
Due to the latter, clinical care can now be delivered electronically which triggered emergence of such subject as health informatics and "Australia is at the leading edge of these developments" (Yellowlees, Brooks, 1999, 4)
As Coiera writes, "If physiology literally means 'the logic of life', and pathology is 'the logic of disease', then health informatics is the logic of healthcare.
It measures the extent to which tests or procedures assess the same characteristic, skill or quality. It is a measure of the precision between the observers or of the measuring instruments used in a study. It refers to how well all the test items relate to each other.
Data collection techniques are basically systematic in nature. It allows one to follow a system of conducting the research and the information gathered can be analyzed by using different models of research. A research is valid if the sources generated for data collection are reliable and are done in a systematic way.
However, despite such huge popularity and global acceptance, the SWOT analysis largely falls short in effectiveness.
The paper begins with a brief analysis of the scope and importance of SWOT tool and then goes forth to make a comparative and critical analysis of the
The lecture lasts for 9:13 minutes and touches on other facets on the social consequences of the Industrial Revolution. Thus, aside from the topic of Fordism, Krier also discussed aspects of Marxism and
The manner in which data is collected creates room for the researcher to introduce personal views into the process. The difference between qualitative research papers with high quality and those with poor quality is directly linked to the personal philosophy of the researcher.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Identify an assesment tool analyse and critically discuss the validity and reliability issues in relation to the tool for FREE!