Nobody downloaded yet

Law of Criminal Evidence - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
There is often an argument in legal circles to count on silence of accused as a sign of guilt because he is supposed to provide reasons and defense arguments for every question raised during pre-trail investigation. In our question we will deal with the same issue. Is there any…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94% of users find it useful
Law of Criminal Evidence
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Law of Criminal Evidence"

Download file to see previous pages This right is based on the Latin maxim nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare (no man is bound to accuse himself’). This principle is found, explicitly or by convention, in many of the worlds legal systems including England and wales. (Murphy, P Murphy) Criminal justice and Public Order,1994, section 38, provides that no conviction shall be based wholly on silence of the accused. Furthermore, though not explicitly found in Europpean Convention of Human Rights, (Dennis, I H ,2002) still in the rulings of Europan Court of Human Right, right ot keep silence is maintained. ( Murray v. UK. 1996) It is therefore, found that Imtiaz’s silence during pre-trial period is based on his legal right and will not esteblish any offence against him. For this purpose, the prosecution can not equate his silence to his confession in a court of law. In order to esteblish any guilt, prosecution shall have to maintain his case beyond admission during custody and the case should be suported by the evidence.
To keep silence in pre-trail inquiry by police is an esteblished right of the accused. He may maintain his position even when there is no advice by his solisitor or his solicitor advices against silence.
It is found in this case that the accused Imtiaz had kept silence on advice of his solisitor and he also mentioned the same in his statement. However, he did not mention any reason for the same. Now, would there be a change in situation and legal consequences on the ground that accused had given any reason for solicitor’s advice? To be very simple, it must be seen in view of accused’s right. Accused is not bound by the advice of his solicitor as in the case of co-accused, Shannan, who refused to have a solicitor altogather and gave her statement. Solicitor is supposed to guide you as per law and no advice against the law of the land is expected from a legal counsel. In this case, too, the advice by Imtiaz’s solicitor is based on ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Law of Criminal Evidence Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1”, n.d.)
Law of Criminal Evidence Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1. Retrieved from
(Law of Criminal Evidence Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1)
Law of Criminal Evidence Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1.
“Law of Criminal Evidence Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Law of Criminal Evidence

Criminal Evidence

.... But, if an individual perpetrates a criminal act, their culpability should be determined through a properly established process and a justified penalty must be given. Criminal law specifies the provisions for implementing procedures in criminal cases, lays down the groups sanctioned to perform these procedures, the kind of procedures and the outcomes of violating the prerequisites of the law. As specified by the Law on Criminal Procedure, one of these processes is the evaluation of witnesses.3 The notion of witness should be viewed from two perspectives. Firstly, the identity and character of the witness, and, secondly,...
18 Pages(4500 words)Dissertation

Law of Criminal Evidence

...Law of Criminal Evidence Case 1 The cases concerning Robert, Asif and Molly bring forth various aspects of criminal law. Robert had confessed in two different occasions that he had stolen the iPods. In this particular case, the prosecutor had no burden of proof since Robert had voluntarily admitted to stealing the iPods. Although he later denied the claims against him concerning the iPods theft, his prior statements, both formal and informal, contradicted him. The prosecution already had evidence of his admission to the theft, which were strong enough to convict him. The evidential burden in this case had been brought forth due to the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Law of Criminal Evidence

...Law of Criminal Evidence Answer to Question i) The basic cloak of innocence is rendered to the defendant until he is proved guilty, by the Court, and this norm has been the bulwark of the tenets of UK criminal proceedings. The onus of proving that defendant is guilty has to be evidentially substantiated by the prosecution and alleged non-innocence is only established upon the passing of the verdict and the establishment of guilt beyond 'reasonable doubt' (Lifchus 1997). Judicial decisions are based on cold logic and cogent thinking besides legal dexterity. There may be many relevant facts to a case which may not be prima-facie available, and yet may be prime material for the establishment of guilt or innocence of the defendant... . It is...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Criminal Evidence

...Are defendants in criminal trials sufficiently protected against the use of improperly obtained evidence This question requires the discussion of whether the present state of the English law with its recent developments and the effect of the European Union Law provides the defendant in a criminal trial with adequate protection against procedural loopholes allowing the authorities and third parties to obtain evidence unfairly. This topic is also related to confessions which are also largely utilised as part of evidence and often raise the issues of the integrity of the defendant's basic human rights. Previously this area...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Law of Criminal Evidence Case Study

...evidence admissibility depends on many observations17. Today's society has been termed as 'Syndrome Society' and psychological and psychiatric evidences are freely admitted into law. The knowledge of psychologists now is being used to testify against or for accused in criminal cases. Application of psychology to legal questions while psychiatry considers more abstract issues, both have become part of legal process. Psychiatric evidence is considered to bring better justice; it also depends of consistency of evidence and its admissibility. Psychology, psychiatry and law have forged very close connections in recent...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Criminal Evidence

...Criminal Evidence Vehicle stops are a great source of criminal apprehension. Over the years, law enforcement officers who are manning traffic on the streets have apprehended several criminals who are in transit from the scene of the crime. Many of these criminals are apprehended not in connection with the crime they have just committed but rather from violation of traffic rules and regulations. However, although routine vehicles stops have been instrumental in apprehending criminals, there have been so many complaints about violations of the rights of the person specifically on the Fourth Amendment which states that the person has the right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches... that in...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Criminal Evidence

...CRIMINAL EVIDENCE al Affiliation) Introduction The case study presents a scenario where the defendant (Miss Maggie) has been accused of calling an alarm concerning a bomb within the premises of her college. This alarm caused high levels of tension and scare among other college students; therefore she has been taken to court charged with the above offense. In order to provide substantial evidence, the prosecutor and the attorney has invited a witness (Mr. Mickie) to provide testimony concerning the above allegations. Discussion A variety of issues emerge from this case, to begin with, Miss Maggie argues that her reasoning was based on the fact that she heard a student along the hall was...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Evidence, Proof, Argument AND Criminal Law

...Issue of Voluntary Manslaughter – Loss of Self Control R V Duncan Moore Issue of Voluntary Manslaughter – Loss of Self Control My Lady, I am Alisha Hussein, and in this matter on behalf of the prosecution, I shall be dealing with the issue of loss of control which states that: A person may be convicted of manslaughter and not murder if he/she exhibits loss of self-control that had a qualifying trigger, and an individual of the same age and sex in the situation might have taken the same or similar action given they have self-control and tolerance1. What is loss of control? In the case of R v Richens [1993] 4 All ER 877; loss of control was established to be complete loss of awareness where a person is not in control of his actions...
2 Pages(500 words)Speech or Presentation

Criminal Evidence Law - Evidential and Legal Burden

...Criminal Evidence Law - Evidential and Legal Burden Altin and William have been charged with the murder of Denzil on the basis of joint enterprise. Under the doctrine, two or more criminal suspects could be charged for colluding in the commission of a crime. It is important for the prosecution to prove that the accused were in action together, failure to which both may be acquitted by the court. Owing to seriousness of the criminal proceedings for murder, the prosecution and the defence have burdens of evidence which they must shoulder in proving their respective cases. Evidential Burden Evidential burden is one of the obligations of pre-trial chamber that must be fulfilled before criminal proceedings can begin. In this case... to...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Criminal Evidence

...Criminal Evidence al Affiliation: Introduction Criminal evidence can be defined as any prove of crime in terms of both verbal and physical evidence. In most cases, it is presented by the defendant as a way of showing they are not guilty. For a criminal case to be successful, the key determinant is the weight of the criminal evidence presented at the time of trial. Forms of Criminal Evidence The major forms of criminal evidence are verbal and physical evidence. In verbal evidence there are confessions whereby the defendant can decide to confess that he or she committed the crime. Testimony offered by the witness is also grouped under verbal criminal evidence (Andrews, 1987). For physical evidence it can be the weapon used to commit... the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Law of Criminal Evidence for FREE!

Contact Us