Nobody downloaded yet

Impact of the war on terror on Rules of Evidence - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
How to defend fundamental liberty in times of national crisis is one of the greatest problems that the political leaders, lawyers and intellectuals are facing today. William Rehnquist, Supreme Court chief justice, said that the administrative authority to engage in conduct that…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.5% of users find it useful
Impact of the war on terror on Rules of Evidence
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Impact of the war on terror on Rules of Evidence"

Download file to see previous pages However the alteration of the U.S. security system after 9/11 and various fresh national security agendas have produced extensive anxiety over the safeguard of international human rights, democratic standards, and several rights preserved in the U.S. Constitution that outline the civil liberties of the American citizens. Since the United States has not experienced any more attack on U.S. soil, which shows the efficiency of different U.S. counterterrorism efforts.
But the 9/11 terrorist attack led the U.S. administration to review several existing laws and strategies and to make fresh ones, mistakes and exceeding the limit associated with these labors added grave erosion of faith in U.S. guiding principles and direction. In foreign countries, exposures of extrajudicial apprehensions and detainee mistreatment have damaged U.S. status and sincerity. Further it hindered counterterrorism collaboration with allies, and endowed with provocative misinformation that helps terrorist radicalization. Internally, policy deviations over security and civil liberties have been recurrent, extensively revealed, and sensitively charged, creating a situation of animosity and doubt that has confronted the people’s faith in the administration, caused division among supporters, and destabilized collaboration among the political branches of government. (Prieto, 2009).
Criminal laws of US normally focus on dealing with criminal actions that have already happened, and are less effective in attaining the counterterrorism aim of preventing future attack. Criminal laws face a lot of disputes in tackling the terrorist threat. Even after a person is detained, a number of challenges face a successful criminal trial. Before 9/11, criminal trials relied on involving the defendant to a specific violent act or a plot to perform such an attack. The admissibility of evidence causes an additional challenge. Information that may be suitable in an intelligence framework may fail to suit the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Impact of the war on terror on Rules of Evidence Essay”, n.d.)
Impact of the war on terror on Rules of Evidence Essay. Retrieved from
(Impact of the War on Terror on Rules of Evidence Essay)
Impact of the War on Terror on Rules of Evidence Essay.
“Impact of the War on Terror on Rules of Evidence Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Impact of the war on terror on Rules of Evidence

The war on terror

...? Strongest work The topic war on terror is the strongest piece of work. This was an argumentative essay over the current war on terror being fought by the United States of America against the most elusive enemy of all time. While writing this piece of writing and after carefully studying the background of this war, I realized that how much it would be painful to lose friend, brother, husband or any other relationship without any fault. It felt very terrible and painful. I learnt that the current war on terror must be continued and every possible attempt must not be left to hunt down any terrorists who do not respect...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Global War on Terror

...College: QUESTION ONE Describe the US policy decisions that Hook and Spanier describe as a “retreat from multilateralism.” In your opinion, which of these policy decisions were and were not appropriate? Also, to what extent do you believe these policy decisions helped or hindered US efforts in the War on Terror? US foreign policy has been drifting away from multilateral institutions policy to unilateral policy. This is inspite of Clinton’s call for engagement with the international community. The depth of Clinton’s downfall in foreign policy was demonstrated by the senate’s rejection of Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which was meant to control arms. The refusal of the world’s foremost nuclear...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment


...?Running Head: Rules of Evidence Admissibility Rules of Evidence Admissibility Rules of Evidence Admissibility The trial and a quittance of Orenthal James Simpson (O.J Simpson) in 1994 through 95 have been deemed as a delightful novel that came to life. The American Football player faced two counts of murder, which involved the murder of ex-wife named Nicole Brown and her friend named Ronald Goldman (Hunt, 1994). From the evidence collection through the court proceedings and the final trial and a quittance of the murder suspect have roused curious speculations and interest among law scholars. Despite the gigantic evidence presented against the suspect, the defense attorney, Johnnie Cochran was able to convince the jurors... that there was...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

War Against Terror identify all the predictable and unpredictable impacts of terrorist influence upon its instant victims. The war against terror develops its intentions to fight and inspire anxiety, even among its' own members of the public which are far removed from its immediate surrounding area, as well as generating widespread moral disgust about the use of these techniques. The war on terror is often considered as a war which is aimed primarily at terrorists but accidentally military targets also suffer thereby inviting 'collateral damage' to occur, where many civilians are accidentally hurt, but this differs from violent acts that are...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

War on Terror

One of the most negative instances of the "War on Terror" occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, as the reader finds out in John Barry, Mark Hosenball and Babak Dehghanpisheh's "Abu Ghraib and Beyond;" many detainees, suspected terrorists, and Taliban fighters, were tortured by U.S. soldiers in an effort to extract information. The instances of torture were photographed and eventually made their way to the press and widespread viewing around the world. In the ensuing session of finger-pointing as to who was responsible, the soldiers who committed the acts claimed to have been told to do so by their superiors; their commanders denied having instructed them to humiliate the prisoners and torture them. The end result was that the so...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

War on Terror

...War on Terror as a Global Issue Global terrorism affects the lives and property of the people directly affected by such acts but it also acts like ripples in a pool of water, spreading economic woes on the U.S. as well as nations far away from the actual attack. The effort to combat terrorism has been economically burdensome as well. The effects of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York, which resulted in more than 3,000 innocent people killed spread human misery further than those persons affected directly by the loss of lives. The U.S. economy was held to a temporary stagnation and the resulting ‘ripple effect’ negatively affected almost everyone in the U.S. and all of the countries it trades... with. The...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Rules of Evidence

...Rules of Evidence Rules of evidence are guidelines on how evidence is handled in the justice system, it contains the proper channels as per the law on how to obtain evidence and use it to prosecute criminals. States have different rules of evidence governing their justice systems. In California for instance the rules of evidence are clearly set and defined. According to Californian law evidence is relevant when ‘when it has any tendency in reason to make the fact that it is offered to prove or disprove either more or less probable’ (DiCarlo 2008). Evidence is material ‘if it is offered to prove a fact that is at issue in the case.’(DiCarlo 2008) For evidence to be considered admissible it has ‘to show motive, plan, intent, or lack... ...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Federal Rules of Evidence

...Federal Rules of Evidence Ms. Woodard’s testimony against Mr. Littlejohn indirectly incriminated the defendant in the murder crime that he was facing. The accused was on trial for the murder of a 24 year old Imette St. Guillen, who was found dumped in Brooklyn in 2006. Therefore, by kidnapping Ms. Woodward, the accused could have the same intentions. Importantly, there were no any other reasons adduced to explain the motive behind he kidnap, and the two had not met before. The accused also had hand cuffs, a gun, boots, and a jacket, all which point to a police officer, an image he used to dupe the victim. The two police handcuffs and the gun were illegally in the accused hands; here was no other...
4 Pages(1000 words)Article

Rules of Evidence

...Insert Introduction Some keywords such as relevant and admissible and material have been used to an extent. According to theMissouri Rules of Evidence, matters that are offered in a case must both be relevant to the issues and tend to either establish or disapprove them, but they must also be material by relating to the issues in the case. Therefore, one can understand the fact that principles such as materiality and relevance may be used interchangeably to refer to the relatability of a piece of evidence to the issues in a case. According to Joy and McMunigal, the word admissible has not been explicitly defined. However, the word is used together with the phrase...
2 Pages(500 words)Admission/Application Essay

Global War on Terror

...War on Terror [Pick the The work takes into consideration the various aspects of war that started post 9/11, and literally changed the lives of millions of people residing in countries affected by war. Although a number of nations across the world joined the war for different reasons, yet the main role was played by the US which functioned as the main sponsor of the war. Due to this key position in the war scenario, the magnitude of losses, as compared to other participating nations of the world, was far greater for the US. The writer is of the opinion that the outcomes of war are not quite encouraging...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Impact of the war on terror on Rules of Evidence for FREE!

Contact Us