Article Critique: Development of an Inter-Professional Competency Model for Healthcare Leadership - Essay Example

Running Head: Critique of the article tilted ‘Development of an inter-professional competency model for healthcare leadership’ Institutional Affiliation……………………….) Calhoun, J G. Dollett, L Sinioris, M E. Wainio, J A Butler, P W. Griffith, J R. Warden, G L (2008) Development of an interprofessional competency model for healthcare leadership. Journal of Healthcare Management 53 (6), 375-391 Study design As the study comprised the integration of various components, it had across over design. The Health Leadership Competency Model as mentioned in the article is developed by extensive academic research coupled by the widespread application outside the healthcare industry. The development of the model also included behavioral event interviewing, psychometric analysis, and cross-industry sector benchmarking. The integration of the model into the health care industry was ensured by additional literature review, practice analysis, expert panel inputs, and pilot-testing survey. The variability in the application of the design has been handled by its wide coverage of twenty six behavioral and technical competencies. These competencies belong to three major domains in the studied industry. However each of these competencies were defined and benchmarked by behavioral indicators, or levels which were used to assess the progress of the professionals involved. The study model also took into consideration the differential developmental requirements. The Health Leadership Competency Model fits into academic conditions and also adheres well with practical circumstances in health care. Objective of the article The article addressed a clearly focused issue. The article aims at reviewing the operational results associated with the Health Leadership Competency Model being used in a number of organizations related with health care industry. It also aims to critically evaluate the outcomes of the application of Health Leadership Competency Models being used in healthcare management graduate programs. The article also specifically identifies the competencies for the model, its specifications and the validation process. The focus of the research is streamlined and has a defined direction. The objectives of the study have been justified by other literatures as z need of the industry. Standardization of Health Leadership Competency Models have been demanded by a number of researchers in the field. Literature Review The authors have referred to appropriate and adequate works. The author referred to an explicit range of database and periodicals. A wide range was covered as literatures have been referred by the authors in the process of reviewing the outcomes Health Leadership Competency Model. Literatures pertaining to the need of improvisation in American Healthcare have been included to assert the importance of the review. A reform in the healthcare education and the overall procedural strategy which has been mentioned as a critical need in the works done on this context also has been included by the authors while reviewing the literatures. The studies which include Health Leadership Competency Models which have been developed all across thirty years prior to the date of the article have been dealt in detail in the literature review. As required by the model of the study, the operational aspect of the Health Leadership Competency Models developed and widely used in the healthcare industry also has been reviewed. The reference included studies with relative factors on differential populations. Apart from the academic interest in the improvisation of standards in healthcare industry, the review of literature also has included the corporate responses involved in developing operational level Health Leadership Competency Models. The list of literatures reviewed includes a wide range of sectors within the healthcare industry as well. The basic aim of the models and their perceptions also has been included in the literature review. Population Sampling The population sampling in the study has been done with reference to the information available in prior research. A sample size of one hundred and five interviewees were selected which is much above the sample size recommended in the referred study. However, only eighty percent of this targeted sample size could be achieved. The sample can only be partially considered a representative sample of the population. The selected sample size was a result of randomized selection from the whole population and it involved seventy to eighty representatives across the industry. However the randomization process was affected hugely by the nonparticipation of more than fifty percent of the population due to various reasons. As the unit of consideration is the behavioral aspects of each individual, the sample size becomes wide summing up to seven thousand to eight thousand behavioral attributes. However as the population is spread across different components of the healthcare industry, the parameters in the referred studies are non parallel which resulted in the cross over design of the study. The quality of the sample population was however double checked. The prior sampling done through nominations by industry experts as per reference to prior literature was cross checked by using seven national rankings. A varied approach was followed in selecting the sample from different classes. In the case of early careerists, the top ten institutes were asked to find the potential interviewees. This varied approach in the selection of different classes of the careerists decreased the variability in the sample. Data Collection The process of data collection was through extensive academic research, behavioral event interviewing, psychometric analysis, and cross-industry sector benchmarking. It also included additional literature review, practice analysis, expert panel inputs, and pilot-testing survey. The quality of the interview sample has been ensured to an extent. However there is no reference in the paper regarding the quality assurance of the interview criteria except the point that prior researches and industry standards were followed to ensure the quality of the data collection process. However the cross-industry sector benchmarking has added complication to the data as the parameters in the referred studies are non parallel which resulted in the cross over design of the study. There is no mention in the article regarding the allocation concealment. The details on the binding of intervention have also not been mentioned. However as the industry experts who acted as the nominators were not allowed to participate in the interview, it contributed to the binding of intervention. Measurement & analysis The measurement and analysis of the data was done by expert panel including academicians, practitioners, educational psychologists, teaching consultants, data analysts, and competency modeling researchers. This resource contributed to the quality of the analysis. The data was analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The data was scaled with reference to the competencies involved into three to six levels of performance. Though each of these levels were properly catalogued and defined with specific explanatory behaviors, much of the qualitative competencies were intangible in nature which may add to the sum of errors. The standardized data was reviewed against operational level approaches to ensure the quality of the data. The realistic approach in the analysis and the behavioral focus in the data collection would however lead to a locally applicable result. The article concluded with an applicable Health Leadership Competency Model Conclusion As of my opinion, the review has successfully made a comparative study of the Health Leadership Competency Models. The methodological quality of standards and the literatures included in the study identified were cross checked adding to the quality of the research. Qualified expertise has been involved in the study improvising its quality. The lack of mention on allocation concealment, completeness of follow-up and the blinding of the result coupled with the non assurance of randomization quality are however the limiting factors of the study Works cited Calhoun, J G. Dollett, L Sinioris, M E. Wainio, J A Butler, P W. Griffith, J R. Warden, G L (2008) Development of an interprofessional competency model for healthcare leadership. Journal of Healthcare Management 53 (6), 375-391 Read More